影响护士政治参与或医疗政策干预的障碍和促进因素:系统回顾与定性元综合

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1155/2024/2606855
Nam Kyung Han, Gwang Suk Kim
{"title":"影响护士政治参与或医疗政策干预的障碍和促进因素:系统回顾与定性元综合","authors":"Nam Kyung Han,&nbsp;Gwang Suk Kim","doi":"10.1155/2024/2606855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of healthcare professionals, must advocate for public health in a changing healthcare environment. Therefore, nurses have a social responsibility to be interested in politics, political participation, or healthcare policy interventions as leaders in healthcare policy reforms. However, previous research has reported that nurses’ political interests and participation are insufficient in most countries. <i>Aim</i>. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized qualitative data to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing nurses’ political participation and healthcare policy interventions. <i>Methods</i>. This study performed a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Literature searches were conducted using seven databases to comprehensively examine published journals, including doctoral dissertations, until December 31, 2023. The selection criteria for this study were articles analyzed using phenomenology, ethnography, qualitative research, and grounded theory, targeting nurses with extensive experience in healthcare policy intervention and political activities. Two researchers, professors in nursing with extensive experience in healthcare policy interventions and qualitative research screened the qualitative studies and extracted the data. Eighteen papers were analyzed, and the quality of each study was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Checklist. Meta-ethnography was applied as the qualitative meta-synthesis method using ATLAS. ti. <i>Results</i>. Barriers include nurses’ lack of political interest and competence, nursing education, restrictive organizational cultures, and the nursing profession’s political activities. Facilitators include recognizing social responsibilities, enhancing political competence, innovating organizational environments, and strengthening nursing organizations’ political activities and policy interventions. <i>Conclusions</i>. This study could be used as data to enhance nurses’ political participation and to plan policy interventions and strategies. <i>Implication for Nursing Management</i>. To activate nurses’ political participation in the future, it is necessary to develop strategies, such as developing nursing political education programs and expanding opportunities for policy intervention.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2606855","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Nurses’ Political Participation or Healthcare Policy Intervention: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Nam Kyung Han,&nbsp;Gwang Suk Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2606855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of healthcare professionals, must advocate for public health in a changing healthcare environment. Therefore, nurses have a social responsibility to be interested in politics, political participation, or healthcare policy interventions as leaders in healthcare policy reforms. However, previous research has reported that nurses’ political interests and participation are insufficient in most countries. <i>Aim</i>. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized qualitative data to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing nurses’ political participation and healthcare policy interventions. <i>Methods</i>. This study performed a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Literature searches were conducted using seven databases to comprehensively examine published journals, including doctoral dissertations, until December 31, 2023. The selection criteria for this study were articles analyzed using phenomenology, ethnography, qualitative research, and grounded theory, targeting nurses with extensive experience in healthcare policy intervention and political activities. Two researchers, professors in nursing with extensive experience in healthcare policy interventions and qualitative research screened the qualitative studies and extracted the data. Eighteen papers were analyzed, and the quality of each study was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Checklist. Meta-ethnography was applied as the qualitative meta-synthesis method using ATLAS. ti. <i>Results</i>. Barriers include nurses’ lack of political interest and competence, nursing education, restrictive organizational cultures, and the nursing profession’s political activities. Facilitators include recognizing social responsibilities, enhancing political competence, innovating organizational environments, and strengthening nursing organizations’ political activities and policy interventions. <i>Conclusions</i>. This study could be used as data to enhance nurses’ political participation and to plan policy interventions and strategies. <i>Implication for Nursing Management</i>. To activate nurses’ political participation in the future, it is necessary to develop strategies, such as developing nursing political education programs and expanding opportunities for policy intervention.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2606855\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2606855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2606855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。护士在医疗保健专业人员中所占比例最大,她们必须在不断变化的医疗保健环境中倡导公共卫生。因此,作为医疗保健政策改革的领导者,护士有社会责任对政治、政治参与或医疗保健政策干预感兴趣。然而,以往的研究报告显示,在大多数国家,护士对政治的兴趣和参与都不足。研究目的本研究对定性数据进行了系统回顾和综合,以确定影响护士参政和医疗政策干预的障碍和促进因素。方法。本研究进行了系统回顾和定性元综合。使用七个数据库进行文献检索,全面研究了截至 2023 年 12 月 31 日已发表的期刊,包括博士论文。本研究的选择标准是使用现象学、人种学、定性研究和基础理论进行分析的文章,目标是在医疗保健政策干预和政治活动方面具有丰富经验的护士。两位在医疗政策干预和定性研究方面具有丰富经验的护理学教授对定性研究进行了筛选并提取了数据。对 18 篇论文进行了分析,并使用 "批判性评价技能计划定性检查表 "对每项研究的质量进行了评估。使用 ATLAS.ti 将元民族志作为定性元综合方法。结果显示障碍包括护士缺乏政治兴趣和能力、护理教育、限制性组织文化以及护理专业的政治活动。促进因素包括认识到社会责任、提高政治能力、创新组织环境、加强护理组织的政治活动和政策干预。结论。本研究可作为加强护士政治参与、规划政策干预和策略的数据。对护理管理的启示。未来要激活护士的政治参与,有必要制定策略,如发展护理政治教育项目和扩大政策干预的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Nurses’ Political Participation or Healthcare Policy Intervention: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis

Background. Nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of healthcare professionals, must advocate for public health in a changing healthcare environment. Therefore, nurses have a social responsibility to be interested in politics, political participation, or healthcare policy interventions as leaders in healthcare policy reforms. However, previous research has reported that nurses’ political interests and participation are insufficient in most countries. Aim. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized qualitative data to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing nurses’ political participation and healthcare policy interventions. Methods. This study performed a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Literature searches were conducted using seven databases to comprehensively examine published journals, including doctoral dissertations, until December 31, 2023. The selection criteria for this study were articles analyzed using phenomenology, ethnography, qualitative research, and grounded theory, targeting nurses with extensive experience in healthcare policy intervention and political activities. Two researchers, professors in nursing with extensive experience in healthcare policy interventions and qualitative research screened the qualitative studies and extracted the data. Eighteen papers were analyzed, and the quality of each study was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Checklist. Meta-ethnography was applied as the qualitative meta-synthesis method using ATLAS. ti. Results. Barriers include nurses’ lack of political interest and competence, nursing education, restrictive organizational cultures, and the nursing profession’s political activities. Facilitators include recognizing social responsibilities, enhancing political competence, innovating organizational environments, and strengthening nursing organizations’ political activities and policy interventions. Conclusions. This study could be used as data to enhance nurses’ political participation and to plan policy interventions and strategies. Implication for Nursing Management. To activate nurses’ political participation in the future, it is necessary to develop strategies, such as developing nursing political education programs and expanding opportunities for policy intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review Challenges in Clinical Training for Nursing Students during COVID-19: Examining Its Effects on Nurses’ Job Satisfaction A Concept Analysis of Change Fatigue Among Nurses Based on Walker and Avant’s Method The Effect of Digital Competence on Nurses’ Career Sustainability: A Cross-Sectional Study Effects of Hierarchical Unit Culture and Power Distance Orientation on Nurses’ Silence Behavior: The Roles of Perceived Futility and Hospital Management Support for Patient Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1