这是计划的一部分吗?检查自我控制、计划和中断情况

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/jasp.13051
Dominic J. Fedele, Patrick D. Converse
{"title":"这是计划的一部分吗?检查自我控制、计划和中断情况","authors":"Dominic J. Fedele,&nbsp;Patrick D. Converse","doi":"10.1111/jasp.13051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interruptions are a common and consequential issue for many individuals in organizational settings. Limited preliminary work suggests that certain individuals may be more susceptible to workplace interruptions but little is known about the nature and implications of these linkages with individual differences. This study examines dispositional self-control as a predictor of workplace intrusions, focusing on (a) both intrusion frequency and severity, (b) planning as a potential mechanism, and (c) implications for task performance and work-related stress. Participants (<i>N</i> = 164) first completed a measure of dispositional self-control and then completed daily surveys for one workweek measuring planning, frequency and severity of intrusions, task performance, and work-related stress. Results indicated that self-control predicted both intrusion frequency and severity. In addition, both intrusion frequency and severity were found to be related to performance and stress. However, no indirect effects involving planning were found. These findings support the notion that individual differences in self-control predict the experience of workplace intrusions; indicate that more-conscious/effortful mechanisms (e.g., planning) may not play a prevalent role in this relationship, indirectly suggesting that less-conscious/effortful mechanisms (e.g., habits) could be more relevant; and demonstrate that intrusion severity may be just as detrimental as intrusion frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was this part of the plan? Examining self-control, planning, and interruptions\",\"authors\":\"Dominic J. Fedele,&nbsp;Patrick D. Converse\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jasp.13051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Interruptions are a common and consequential issue for many individuals in organizational settings. Limited preliminary work suggests that certain individuals may be more susceptible to workplace interruptions but little is known about the nature and implications of these linkages with individual differences. This study examines dispositional self-control as a predictor of workplace intrusions, focusing on (a) both intrusion frequency and severity, (b) planning as a potential mechanism, and (c) implications for task performance and work-related stress. Participants (<i>N</i> = 164) first completed a measure of dispositional self-control and then completed daily surveys for one workweek measuring planning, frequency and severity of intrusions, task performance, and work-related stress. Results indicated that self-control predicted both intrusion frequency and severity. In addition, both intrusion frequency and severity were found to be related to performance and stress. However, no indirect effects involving planning were found. These findings support the notion that individual differences in self-control predict the experience of workplace intrusions; indicate that more-conscious/effortful mechanisms (e.g., planning) may not play a prevalent role in this relationship, indirectly suggesting that less-conscious/effortful mechanisms (e.g., habits) could be more relevant; and demonstrate that intrusion severity may be just as detrimental as intrusion frequency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Social Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.13051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.13051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于组织环境中的许多人来说,工作中断是一个常见且具有后果性的问题。有限的初步研究表明,某些人可能更容易受到工作场所干扰的影响,但对于这些与个体差异之间联系的性质和影响却知之甚少。本研究探讨了作为工作场所干扰预测因素的自我控制倾向,重点关注(a)干扰频率和严重程度,(b)作为潜在机制的计划,以及(c)对任务绩效和工作相关压力的影响。参与者(N = 164)首先完成了一项关于自我控制倾向的测量,然后在一个工作周内完成了每日调查,测量内容包括计划性、入侵的频率和严重程度、任务绩效以及与工作相关的压力。结果表明,自我控制可以预测入侵的频率和严重程度。此外,入侵频率和严重程度还与工作表现和压力有关。但是,没有发现涉及计划的间接影响。这些研究结果支持这样一种观点,即自我控制方面的个体差异可以预测工作场所的入侵体验;表明在这种关系中,意识更强/更痛苦的机制(如计划)可能并不占主导地位,这间接表明意识较弱/较痛苦的机制(如习惯)可能与之更为相关;还表明入侵的严重程度可能与入侵频率一样有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Was this part of the plan? Examining self-control, planning, and interruptions

Interruptions are a common and consequential issue for many individuals in organizational settings. Limited preliminary work suggests that certain individuals may be more susceptible to workplace interruptions but little is known about the nature and implications of these linkages with individual differences. This study examines dispositional self-control as a predictor of workplace intrusions, focusing on (a) both intrusion frequency and severity, (b) planning as a potential mechanism, and (c) implications for task performance and work-related stress. Participants (N = 164) first completed a measure of dispositional self-control and then completed daily surveys for one workweek measuring planning, frequency and severity of intrusions, task performance, and work-related stress. Results indicated that self-control predicted both intrusion frequency and severity. In addition, both intrusion frequency and severity were found to be related to performance and stress. However, no indirect effects involving planning were found. These findings support the notion that individual differences in self-control predict the experience of workplace intrusions; indicate that more-conscious/effortful mechanisms (e.g., planning) may not play a prevalent role in this relationship, indirectly suggesting that less-conscious/effortful mechanisms (e.g., habits) could be more relevant; and demonstrate that intrusion severity may be just as detrimental as intrusion frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
期刊最新文献
Using self‐determination theory to link empathy and voluntary health behaviors Issue Information Belief in conspiracy theories and satisfaction in interpersonal relationships Workplace loneliness: Relationships with abstract entities as substitutes for peer relationships Motivated perception of leaders when perceived political party continuity is low: The mediating role of self‐uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1