草地管理对种子库多样性和组成的长期影响

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Vegetation Science Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/jvs.13282
Alida A. Hábenczyus, Iva Weiterová, Kacper Foremnik, Aljaž Jakob, Siddharth Khopkar, Agnishikhe Kumar, Anamaria Lazăr, Bruno Paganeli, Kenz Raouf Samraoui, Jeni Sidwell, Jan Hrček, Jan Lepš, Jules Segrestin
{"title":"草地管理对种子库多样性和组成的长期影响","authors":"Alida A. Hábenczyus,&nbsp;Iva Weiterová,&nbsp;Kacper Foremnik,&nbsp;Aljaž Jakob,&nbsp;Siddharth Khopkar,&nbsp;Agnishikhe Kumar,&nbsp;Anamaria Lazăr,&nbsp;Bruno Paganeli,&nbsp;Kenz Raouf Samraoui,&nbsp;Jeni Sidwell,&nbsp;Jan Hrček,&nbsp;Jan Lepš,&nbsp;Jules Segrestin","doi":"10.1111/jvs.13282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Oligotrophic grasslands are habitats that host among the most diverse plant communities in Europe. Altering management regimes by either intensifying or ceasing management is known to decrease plant diversity. Yet, despite its importance for the recovery of plant communities after disturbances, little is known about whether seed banks are also affected by changes in management. Here, we investigate the effect of management practices on a meadow seed bank using a long-term manipulative experiment. We focus on the response of the seed bank to the treatments, and the relationship between the seed bank and the vegetation response.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study was conducted in a species-rich wet meadow. The experiment consists of a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing, and removal of the dominant species. After 20 years of management, the seed bank was sampled seasonally at two soil layer depths. Standing vegetation was recorded in June at the peak of vegetation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All seed bank characteristics varied between soil layers. Mowing decreased seed density and diversity, while fertilization significantly affected the species composition. Dominant removal had no effect on the seed bank. While seed bank diversity was not correlated to vegetation diversity, individual species' responses to mowing and fertilization were positively correlated in the seed bank and the vegetation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results show that long-term management influences the seed bank down to 10 cm of soil depth. Whereas mowing apparently reduced seed density and diversity, the effects of fertilization on these characteristics were harder to interpret. After 20 years, most species had concordant responses to both mowing and fertilization, indicating a low legacy of previous management regimes on the seed bank. Our study reveals that the intensification of grassland management has a profound effect on plant diversity by directly affecting plant communities and their seed-bank-driven recovery potential.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effects of meadow management on seed bank diversity and composition\",\"authors\":\"Alida A. Hábenczyus,&nbsp;Iva Weiterová,&nbsp;Kacper Foremnik,&nbsp;Aljaž Jakob,&nbsp;Siddharth Khopkar,&nbsp;Agnishikhe Kumar,&nbsp;Anamaria Lazăr,&nbsp;Bruno Paganeli,&nbsp;Kenz Raouf Samraoui,&nbsp;Jeni Sidwell,&nbsp;Jan Hrček,&nbsp;Jan Lepš,&nbsp;Jules Segrestin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvs.13282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Oligotrophic grasslands are habitats that host among the most diverse plant communities in Europe. Altering management regimes by either intensifying or ceasing management is known to decrease plant diversity. Yet, despite its importance for the recovery of plant communities after disturbances, little is known about whether seed banks are also affected by changes in management. Here, we investigate the effect of management practices on a meadow seed bank using a long-term manipulative experiment. We focus on the response of the seed bank to the treatments, and the relationship between the seed bank and the vegetation response.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study was conducted in a species-rich wet meadow. The experiment consists of a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing, and removal of the dominant species. After 20 years of management, the seed bank was sampled seasonally at two soil layer depths. Standing vegetation was recorded in June at the peak of vegetation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All seed bank characteristics varied between soil layers. Mowing decreased seed density and diversity, while fertilization significantly affected the species composition. Dominant removal had no effect on the seed bank. While seed bank diversity was not correlated to vegetation diversity, individual species' responses to mowing and fertilization were positively correlated in the seed bank and the vegetation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results show that long-term management influences the seed bank down to 10 cm of soil depth. Whereas mowing apparently reduced seed density and diversity, the effects of fertilization on these characteristics were harder to interpret. After 20 years, most species had concordant responses to both mowing and fertilization, indicating a low legacy of previous management regimes on the seed bank. Our study reveals that the intensification of grassland management has a profound effect on plant diversity by directly affecting plant communities and their seed-bank-driven recovery potential.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 低营养草地是欧洲植物群落最多样化的栖息地之一。众所周知,通过加强或停止管理来改变管理制度会降低植物多样性。然而,尽管种子库对于植物群落在受到干扰后的恢复非常重要,但人们对种子库是否也会受到管理变化的影响却知之甚少。在这里,我们通过一个长期操纵实验来研究管理措施对草地种子库的影响。我们的重点是种子库对处理方法的反应,以及种子库与植被反应之间的关系。 方法 研究在物种丰富的湿草甸上进行。实验包括施肥、除草和移除优势物种的因子组合。经过 20 年的管理后,按季节在两个土层深度对种子库进行采样。在植被高峰期的 6 月份记录常绿植被。 结果 不同土层的种子库特征各不相同。除草降低了种子密度和多样性,而施肥则对物种组成有显著影响。清除优势物种对种子库没有影响。虽然种子库多样性与植被多样性不相关,但在种子库和植被中,单个物种对除草和施肥的反应呈正相关。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,长期管理对种子库的影响可达 10 厘米深的土壤。除草明显降低了种子密度和多样性,而施肥对这些特征的影响则难以解释。20 年后,大多数物种对除草和施肥的反应一致,这表明以前的管理制度对种子库的影响较小。我们的研究表明,加强草地管理会直接影响植物群落及其由种子库驱动的恢复潜力,从而对植物多样性产生深远影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term effects of meadow management on seed bank diversity and composition

Aims

Oligotrophic grasslands are habitats that host among the most diverse plant communities in Europe. Altering management regimes by either intensifying or ceasing management is known to decrease plant diversity. Yet, despite its importance for the recovery of plant communities after disturbances, little is known about whether seed banks are also affected by changes in management. Here, we investigate the effect of management practices on a meadow seed bank using a long-term manipulative experiment. We focus on the response of the seed bank to the treatments, and the relationship between the seed bank and the vegetation response.

Methods

The study was conducted in a species-rich wet meadow. The experiment consists of a factorial combination of fertilization, mowing, and removal of the dominant species. After 20 years of management, the seed bank was sampled seasonally at two soil layer depths. Standing vegetation was recorded in June at the peak of vegetation.

Results

All seed bank characteristics varied between soil layers. Mowing decreased seed density and diversity, while fertilization significantly affected the species composition. Dominant removal had no effect on the seed bank. While seed bank diversity was not correlated to vegetation diversity, individual species' responses to mowing and fertilization were positively correlated in the seed bank and the vegetation.

Conclusions

Our results show that long-term management influences the seed bank down to 10 cm of soil depth. Whereas mowing apparently reduced seed density and diversity, the effects of fertilization on these characteristics were harder to interpret. After 20 years, most species had concordant responses to both mowing and fertilization, indicating a low legacy of previous management regimes on the seed bank. Our study reveals that the intensification of grassland management has a profound effect on plant diversity by directly affecting plant communities and their seed-bank-driven recovery potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
期刊最新文献
Role of Plant Specialists in Fine-Scale Diversity–Area Relationships (DARs) in Southern European Atlantic Coastal Dunes Willow above, changes below: Seedless tree invader impacts riparian seed bank in the Patagonian ecotone Repeat photography reveals long-term climate change impacts on sub-Antarctic tundra vegetation Mammalian herbivory alters structure, composition and edaphic conditions of a grey-dune community Short-term vegetation shifts in an alpine grassland under current and simulated climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1