局部利多卡因、四卡因和阿替卡因治疗儿童扁桃体切除术后疼痛的疗效比较:一项前瞻性安慰剂对照研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2372298
Vahit Mutlu, Zulkuf Kaya
{"title":"局部利多卡因、四卡因和阿替卡因治疗儿童扁桃体切除术后疼痛的疗效比较:一项前瞻性安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Vahit Mutlu, Zulkuf Kaya","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2372298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most important problem in tonsillectomy is pain in the early postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We purposed to compare the effects of lidocaine, tetracaine, and articaine application to the peritonsillar bed on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective, placebo-controlled study included 80 patients, ages 3-14, who were scheduled for elective tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly divided into four groups. Group 1 received 0.9% NaCl; group 2 received 2% lidocaine; group 3 received 2% tetracaine; and group 4 received 4% articaine to the tonsillary bed for 5 min just after the operation. All patients were evaluated in terms of pain and pain-related adverse events in the postoperative 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups that used local anesthetics had significantly lower pain levels than the control group in the first eight hours (<i>p</i> < .001). Furthermore, the articaine group had a lower pain score than the tetracaine group at the eighth hour (<i>p</i> < .05). The articaine group had a lower pain score at the 16th hour than both the control and tetracaine groups (<i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups at the 24th hour (<i>p</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>We recommend the immediate application of topical articaine to the tonsillar bed following the procedure to enhance postoperative pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"320-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of topical lidocaine, tetracaine, and articaine for post-tonsillectomy pain management in children: a prospective, placebo-controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Vahit Mutlu, Zulkuf Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2372298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most important problem in tonsillectomy is pain in the early postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We purposed to compare the effects of lidocaine, tetracaine, and articaine application to the peritonsillar bed on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective, placebo-controlled study included 80 patients, ages 3-14, who were scheduled for elective tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly divided into four groups. Group 1 received 0.9% NaCl; group 2 received 2% lidocaine; group 3 received 2% tetracaine; and group 4 received 4% articaine to the tonsillary bed for 5 min just after the operation. All patients were evaluated in terms of pain and pain-related adverse events in the postoperative 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups that used local anesthetics had significantly lower pain levels than the control group in the first eight hours (<i>p</i> < .001). Furthermore, the articaine group had a lower pain score than the tetracaine group at the eighth hour (<i>p</i> < .05). The articaine group had a lower pain score at the 16th hour than both the control and tetracaine groups (<i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups at the 24th hour (<i>p</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and significance: </strong>We recommend the immediate application of topical articaine to the tonsillar bed following the procedure to enhance postoperative pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"320-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2372298\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2372298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扁桃体切除术中最重要的问题是术后早期的疼痛:扁桃体切除术中最重要的问题是术后早期的疼痛:我们旨在比较利多卡因、四卡因和阿替卡因在扁桃体切除术后对儿童疼痛的影响:这项前瞻性安慰剂对照研究包括 80 名 3-14 岁计划接受扁桃体切除术的患者。患者被随机分为四组。第 1 组接受 0.9% 氯化钠注射;第 2 组接受 2% 利多卡因注射;第 3 组接受 2% 四卡因注射;第 4 组接受 4% 阿替卡因注射,手术刚结束时在扁桃体床注射 5 分钟。对所有患者术后24小时的疼痛和疼痛相关不良反应进行评估:结果:所有使用局麻药的组别在术后 8 小时内的疼痛程度均明显低于对照组(P P P P > .05):我们建议术后立即在扁桃体床局部使用阿替卡因,以加强术后疼痛控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative efficacy of topical lidocaine, tetracaine, and articaine for post-tonsillectomy pain management in children: a prospective, placebo-controlled study.

Background: The most important problem in tonsillectomy is pain in the early postoperative period.

Objective: We purposed to compare the effects of lidocaine, tetracaine, and articaine application to the peritonsillar bed on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.

Methods: The prospective, placebo-controlled study included 80 patients, ages 3-14, who were scheduled for elective tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly divided into four groups. Group 1 received 0.9% NaCl; group 2 received 2% lidocaine; group 3 received 2% tetracaine; and group 4 received 4% articaine to the tonsillary bed for 5 min just after the operation. All patients were evaluated in terms of pain and pain-related adverse events in the postoperative 24 h.

Results: All groups that used local anesthetics had significantly lower pain levels than the control group in the first eight hours (p < .001). Furthermore, the articaine group had a lower pain score than the tetracaine group at the eighth hour (p < .05). The articaine group had a lower pain score at the 16th hour than both the control and tetracaine groups (p < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups at the 24th hour (p > .05).

Conclusion and significance: We recommend the immediate application of topical articaine to the tonsillar bed following the procedure to enhance postoperative pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Association between hearing severity and hematological findings at initial presentation in Meniere's disease. Long-term hearing outcomes and prognostic factors in Meniere's disease. Outcomes of endolymphatic sac surgery for lermoyez syndrome: a 2-year and 10-year follow-up. Clinicopathological analysis of 400 cervical lymph node biopsies in patients with suspected malignancy. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct concomitant with endolymphatic hydrops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1