唾液酸ligilactobacillus V4II-90 根除孕期 B 群链球菌定植:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Beneficial microbes Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1163/18762891-bja00021
A Gálvez, E Dı Az de Terán, J Á Espinosa, J Pérez-Pedregosa, J L Bartha-Rasero, J G Del Valle, M J Cuerva, E Jiménez, C Badiola
{"title":"唾液酸ligilactobacillus V4II-90 根除孕期 B 群链球菌定植:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"A Gálvez, E Dı Az de Terán, J Á Espinosa, J Pérez-Pedregosa, J L Bartha-Rasero, J G Del Valle, M J Cuerva, E Jiménez, C Badiola","doi":"10.1163/18762891-bja00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of bacterial neonatal sepsis. This study aimed to confirm the effect of Ligilactobacillus salivarius V4II-90 on GBS colonisation during pregnancy. A randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in seven hospitals in Madrid, Spain. The sample was broken down into two groups with 20 participants each (n = 40) in order to show reduced GBS colonisation frequency in the probiotic versus the placebo group. Pregnant participants positive for vaginal-rectal colonisation before or during the 13th week of gestation were randomly assigned to either the placebo or the probiotic group. The probiotic, L. salivarius V4II-90 at 1 × 109 cfu/day was administered for 12 weeks, starting at week 21-23 of gestation. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with vaginal and/or rectal GBS colonisation at the end of the intervention period (35 weeks of gestation). Secondary outcomes were changes in the microbial composition of vaginal and rectal exudates; premature delivery; premature rupture of membranes; intrapartum antibiotics; new-borns with early or late-onset GBS sepsis; adverse events (AEs); and GBS test results performed at the hospital at week 35 of gestation. Of the 481 participants included, 44 were vaginal-rectal colonised with GBS and randomised. 43 completed the study (20 in the probiotic group and 23 in the placebo group). After intervention, GBS was eradicated in six participants (27%) from the placebo group and in twelve participants (63%) from the probiotic group ( P = 0.030). None of the 185 AEs reported were identified as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the investigational product. In conclusion, oral administration of L. salivarius V4II-90 is a safe and successful strategy to significantly decrease the rates of GBS colonisation at the end of pregnancy and, therefore, to reduce the exposure of subjects and their infants to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT03669094.</p>","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":" ","pages":"387-396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ligilactobacillus salivarius V4II-90 eradicates Group B Streptococcus colonisation during pregnancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"A Gálvez, E Dı Az de Terán, J Á Espinosa, J Pérez-Pedregosa, J L Bartha-Rasero, J G Del Valle, M J Cuerva, E Jiménez, C Badiola\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18762891-bja00021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of bacterial neonatal sepsis. This study aimed to confirm the effect of Ligilactobacillus salivarius V4II-90 on GBS colonisation during pregnancy. A randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in seven hospitals in Madrid, Spain. The sample was broken down into two groups with 20 participants each (n = 40) in order to show reduced GBS colonisation frequency in the probiotic versus the placebo group. Pregnant participants positive for vaginal-rectal colonisation before or during the 13th week of gestation were randomly assigned to either the placebo or the probiotic group. The probiotic, L. salivarius V4II-90 at 1 × 109 cfu/day was administered for 12 weeks, starting at week 21-23 of gestation. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with vaginal and/or rectal GBS colonisation at the end of the intervention period (35 weeks of gestation). Secondary outcomes were changes in the microbial composition of vaginal and rectal exudates; premature delivery; premature rupture of membranes; intrapartum antibiotics; new-borns with early or late-onset GBS sepsis; adverse events (AEs); and GBS test results performed at the hospital at week 35 of gestation. Of the 481 participants included, 44 were vaginal-rectal colonised with GBS and randomised. 43 completed the study (20 in the probiotic group and 23 in the placebo group). After intervention, GBS was eradicated in six participants (27%) from the placebo group and in twelve participants (63%) from the probiotic group ( P = 0.030). None of the 185 AEs reported were identified as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the investigational product. In conclusion, oral administration of L. salivarius V4II-90 is a safe and successful strategy to significantly decrease the rates of GBS colonisation at the end of pregnancy and, therefore, to reduce the exposure of subjects and their infants to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT03669094.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"387-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

B 组链球菌(GBS)是新生儿细菌性败血症的主要病因。本研究旨在证实唾液酸左旋乳杆菌 V4II-90 对孕期 GBS 定植的影响。在西班牙马德里的七家医院进行了一项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究。样本分为两组,每组 20 人(n = 40),以显示益生菌组与安慰剂组相比,GBS 定植频率降低。在妊娠第 13 周之前或期间阴道直肠菌落阳性的孕妇被随机分配到安慰剂组或益生菌组。益生菌为唾液球菌 V4II-90,浓度为 1 × 109 cfu/天,从妊娠第 21-23 周开始服用,为期 12 周。主要结果是干预期结束时(妊娠 35 周)阴道和/或直肠 GBS 定植参与者的百分比。次要结果包括阴道和直肠渗出物微生物组成的变化、早产、胎膜早破、产褥期抗生素、新生儿早期或晚期GBS败血症、不良事件(AE)以及妊娠35周时医院进行的GBS检测结果。在纳入的 481 名参与者中,有 44 人经阴道直肠感染了 GBS 并被随机选中。43 人完成了研究(益生菌组 20 人,安慰剂组 23 人)。干预后,安慰剂组的 6 名参与者(27%)和益生菌组的 12 名参与者(63%)根除了 GBS(P = 0.030)。在报告的 185 例 AEs 中,没有一例被确定为可能、大概或肯定与研究产品有关。总之,口服唾液球菌 V4II-90 是一种安全、成功的策略,可显著降低妊娠末期 GBS 定植率,从而减少受试者及其婴儿在产前接受抗生素预防治疗的风险。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03669094。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ligilactobacillus salivarius V4II-90 eradicates Group B Streptococcus colonisation during pregnancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is the leading cause of bacterial neonatal sepsis. This study aimed to confirm the effect of Ligilactobacillus salivarius V4II-90 on GBS colonisation during pregnancy. A randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in seven hospitals in Madrid, Spain. The sample was broken down into two groups with 20 participants each (n = 40) in order to show reduced GBS colonisation frequency in the probiotic versus the placebo group. Pregnant participants positive for vaginal-rectal colonisation before or during the 13th week of gestation were randomly assigned to either the placebo or the probiotic group. The probiotic, L. salivarius V4II-90 at 1 × 109 cfu/day was administered for 12 weeks, starting at week 21-23 of gestation. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with vaginal and/or rectal GBS colonisation at the end of the intervention period (35 weeks of gestation). Secondary outcomes were changes in the microbial composition of vaginal and rectal exudates; premature delivery; premature rupture of membranes; intrapartum antibiotics; new-borns with early or late-onset GBS sepsis; adverse events (AEs); and GBS test results performed at the hospital at week 35 of gestation. Of the 481 participants included, 44 were vaginal-rectal colonised with GBS and randomised. 43 completed the study (20 in the probiotic group and 23 in the placebo group). After intervention, GBS was eradicated in six participants (27%) from the placebo group and in twelve participants (63%) from the probiotic group ( P = 0.030). None of the 185 AEs reported were identified as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the investigational product. In conclusion, oral administration of L. salivarius V4II-90 is a safe and successful strategy to significantly decrease the rates of GBS colonisation at the end of pregnancy and, therefore, to reduce the exposure of subjects and their infants to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT03669094.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
期刊最新文献
Aerobic bacterial group as an early-stage biomarker from faecal samples of patients with colorectal cancer without distant metastasis. Effects of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in neonates exposed to antibiotics: a randomised controlled trial. In vitro validation of colon delivery of vitamin B2 through a food grade multi-unit particle system. Oral supplementation of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis strain EC-12 relieves gastrointestinal discomfort and alters the gut microecology in academically stressed students. Impact of two human milk oligosaccharides and lactose on the faecal microbiome of infants with probable cow's milk allergy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1