静脉注射脂质乳剂对凝血测试的干扰:体外分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2370324
Klara De Baerdemaeker, Eleanor Foxton, David M Wood, John R H Archer, Kerry Layne, Caitlin Wolfe, Paul I Dargan
{"title":"静脉注射脂质乳剂对凝血测试的干扰:体外分析。","authors":"Klara De Baerdemaeker, Eleanor Foxton, David M Wood, John R H Archer, Kerry Layne, Caitlin Wolfe, Paul I Dargan","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2370324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravenous lipid emulsion is used in the rescue treatment of certain poisonings. A complication is interference with laboratory analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous lipid emulsion on routine laboratory analysis of coagulation parameters <i>ex vivo</i> and determine if any of the analytical techniques remain reliable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples were obtained from 19 healthy volunteers and divided in triplicate. One sample served as a control, and the other two were diluted to simulate the treatment of an average adult with Intralipid<sup>®</sup> 20 per cent Fresenius Kabi 100 mL (dilution-1) or 500 mL (dilution-2). Coagulation tests performed were prothrombin time, activated prothrombin time, D-dimer concentration and fibrinogen. Coagulation testing was performed by three techniques. Test-1 was performed on a Sysmex CN6000 analyzer. Test-2 was performed with a manual mechanical endpoint method using the semi-automated Stago KC4 Delta. Test-3 involved high-speed centrifugation before repeat testing on the Sysmex CN6000 analyzer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For test-1, only nine (47 per cent) samples in dilution-1 could be analyzed for coagulation tests, and no coagulation tests could be analyzed for dilution-2 because of lipaemia. For test-2 and test-3, all samples could be analyzed, and all results of both testing methods fell within the limits of the laboratory reference range.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Difficulties in laboratory analysis of patients having received intravenous lipid emulsion are due to multiple factors. Most automated coagulation analyzers use optical measurements, which can be unreliable in the presence of a high intravenous lipid concentration. By altering the lipaemia in the testing solution using high-speed centrifugation or by using manual mechanical endpoint detection, we were able to obtain reliable results. These findings are limited by the use of an <i>ex vivo</i> method and healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This <i>ex vivo</i> model confirms that Intralipid<sup>®</sup> interferes with routine coagulation studies. It is important that clinicians are aware and inform their laboratories of its administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"441-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous lipid emulsion interference in coagulation testing: an <i>ex vivo</i> analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Klara De Baerdemaeker, Eleanor Foxton, David M Wood, John R H Archer, Kerry Layne, Caitlin Wolfe, Paul I Dargan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15563650.2024.2370324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravenous lipid emulsion is used in the rescue treatment of certain poisonings. A complication is interference with laboratory analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous lipid emulsion on routine laboratory analysis of coagulation parameters <i>ex vivo</i> and determine if any of the analytical techniques remain reliable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples were obtained from 19 healthy volunteers and divided in triplicate. One sample served as a control, and the other two were diluted to simulate the treatment of an average adult with Intralipid<sup>®</sup> 20 per cent Fresenius Kabi 100 mL (dilution-1) or 500 mL (dilution-2). Coagulation tests performed were prothrombin time, activated prothrombin time, D-dimer concentration and fibrinogen. Coagulation testing was performed by three techniques. Test-1 was performed on a Sysmex CN6000 analyzer. Test-2 was performed with a manual mechanical endpoint method using the semi-automated Stago KC4 Delta. Test-3 involved high-speed centrifugation before repeat testing on the Sysmex CN6000 analyzer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For test-1, only nine (47 per cent) samples in dilution-1 could be analyzed for coagulation tests, and no coagulation tests could be analyzed for dilution-2 because of lipaemia. For test-2 and test-3, all samples could be analyzed, and all results of both testing methods fell within the limits of the laboratory reference range.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Difficulties in laboratory analysis of patients having received intravenous lipid emulsion are due to multiple factors. Most automated coagulation analyzers use optical measurements, which can be unreliable in the presence of a high intravenous lipid concentration. By altering the lipaemia in the testing solution using high-speed centrifugation or by using manual mechanical endpoint detection, we were able to obtain reliable results. These findings are limited by the use of an <i>ex vivo</i> method and healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This <i>ex vivo</i> model confirms that Intralipid<sup>®</sup> interferes with routine coagulation studies. It is important that clinicians are aware and inform their laboratories of its administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"441-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2370324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2370324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介静脉注射脂质乳剂可用于某些中毒的抢救治疗。其并发症之一是干扰实验室分析。本研究旨在确定静脉注射脂质乳剂对体内外凝血参数常规实验室分析的影响,并确定是否有任何分析技术仍然可靠:方法:从 19 名健康志愿者身上采集样本,一式三份。方法:从19名健康志愿者身上采集样品,一式三份,一份作为对照,另外两份稀释后模拟普通成年人使用20%费森尤斯卡比Intralipid® 100毫升(稀释-1)或500毫升(稀释-2)进行治疗。凝血试验包括凝血酶原时间、活化凝血酶原时间、D-二聚体浓度和纤维蛋白原。凝血检测通过三种技术进行。测试-1 在 Sysmex CN6000 分析仪上进行。测试-2 采用半自动 Stago KC4 Delta 手动机械终点法进行。测试 3 采用高速离心法,然后在 Sysmex CN6000 分析仪上进行重复测试:结果:在测试-1 中,只有 9 份(47%)稀释-1 样品可以进行凝血测试分析,而稀释-2 样品因脂肪血症无法进行凝血测试分析。至于检测-2 和检测-3,所有样本都能进行分析,两种检测方法的所有结果都在实验室参考范围之内:讨论:对接受静脉注射脂质乳剂的患者进行实验室分析的困难是由多种因素造成的。大多数自动凝血分析仪使用的是光学测量方法,在静脉注射高浓度脂质的情况下,这种方法可能并不可靠。通过高速离心或手动机械终点检测来改变检测溶液中的脂血浓度,我们能够获得可靠的结果。由于使用了体外方法和健康志愿者,这些研究结果受到了限制:这一体内外模型证实,Intralipid®会干扰常规凝血研究。临床医生必须了解并告知实验室其用药情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous lipid emulsion interference in coagulation testing: an ex vivo analysis.

Introduction: Intravenous lipid emulsion is used in the rescue treatment of certain poisonings. A complication is interference with laboratory analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous lipid emulsion on routine laboratory analysis of coagulation parameters ex vivo and determine if any of the analytical techniques remain reliable.

Methods: Samples were obtained from 19 healthy volunteers and divided in triplicate. One sample served as a control, and the other two were diluted to simulate the treatment of an average adult with Intralipid® 20 per cent Fresenius Kabi 100 mL (dilution-1) or 500 mL (dilution-2). Coagulation tests performed were prothrombin time, activated prothrombin time, D-dimer concentration and fibrinogen. Coagulation testing was performed by three techniques. Test-1 was performed on a Sysmex CN6000 analyzer. Test-2 was performed with a manual mechanical endpoint method using the semi-automated Stago KC4 Delta. Test-3 involved high-speed centrifugation before repeat testing on the Sysmex CN6000 analyzer.

Results: For test-1, only nine (47 per cent) samples in dilution-1 could be analyzed for coagulation tests, and no coagulation tests could be analyzed for dilution-2 because of lipaemia. For test-2 and test-3, all samples could be analyzed, and all results of both testing methods fell within the limits of the laboratory reference range.

Discussion: Difficulties in laboratory analysis of patients having received intravenous lipid emulsion are due to multiple factors. Most automated coagulation analyzers use optical measurements, which can be unreliable in the presence of a high intravenous lipid concentration. By altering the lipaemia in the testing solution using high-speed centrifugation or by using manual mechanical endpoint detection, we were able to obtain reliable results. These findings are limited by the use of an ex vivo method and healthy volunteers.

Conclusions: This ex vivo model confirms that Intralipid® interferes with routine coagulation studies. It is important that clinicians are aware and inform their laboratories of its administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a systematic review. A 10-year retrospective review of exposures to volatile nitrites reported to the Victorian Poisons Information Centre. Response to West et al. "Identifying and quantifying exposures involving counterfeit opioid analgesic products". An outbreak of Galerina sulciceps-like (Galerina cf. sulciceps) mushroom poisoning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1