COVID-19 大流行封锁对紧急医疗服务利用率和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量的影响--澳大利亚的视角。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2024.02.018
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行封锁对紧急医疗服务利用率和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量的影响--澳大利亚的视角。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume declined during periods of COVID-19 lockdown internationally in 2020. The effect of lockdown on emergency medical service (EMS) utilisation, and PCI volume during the initial phase of the pandemic in Australia has not been well described.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We analysed data from the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), a state-wide PCI registry, linked with the Ambulance Victoria EMS registry. PCI volume, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularisation, and stroke), and EMS utilisation were compared over four time periods: lockdown (26 Mar 2020–12 May 2020); pre-lockdown (26 Feb 2020–25 Mar 2020); post-lockdown (13 May 2020–10 Jul 2020); and the year prior (26 Mar 2019–12 May 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess PCI trends within and between consecutive periods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The EMS utilisation for ACS during lockdown was higher compared with other periods: lockdown 39.4% vs pre-lockdown 29.7%; vs post-lockdown 33.6%; vs year prior 27.1%; all p&lt;0.01. Median daily PCI cases were similar: 31 (IQR 10, 38) during lockdown; 39 (15, 49) pre-lockdown; 39.5 (11, 44) post-lockdown; and, 42 (10, 49) the year prior; all p&gt;0.05. Median door-to-procedure time for ACS indication during lockdown was shorter at 3 hours (1.2, 20.6) vs pre-lockdown 3.9 (1.7, 21); vs post-lockdown 3.5 (1.5, 21.26); and, the year prior 3.5 (1.5, 23.7); all p&lt;0.05. Lockdown period was associated with lower odds for 30-day MACCE compared to pre-lockdown (odds ratio [OR] 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026); post-lockdown (OR 0.66; [0.40–1.06]; p=0.087); and the year prior (OR 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Contrary to international trends, EMS utilisation for ACS increased during lockdown but PCI volumes remained similar throughout the initial stages of the pandemic in Victoria, with no observed adverse effect on 30-day MACCE during lockdown. These data suggest that the public health response in Victoria was not associated with poorer quality cardiovascular care in patients receiving PCI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950624001562/pdfft?md5=50294154f5e86b60ec004088c245279a&pid=1-s2.0-S1443950624001562-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Emergency Medical Service Utilisation, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume—An Australian Perspective\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.02.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume declined during periods of COVID-19 lockdown internationally in 2020. The effect of lockdown on emergency medical service (EMS) utilisation, and PCI volume during the initial phase of the pandemic in Australia has not been well described.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We analysed data from the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), a state-wide PCI registry, linked with the Ambulance Victoria EMS registry. PCI volume, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularisation, and stroke), and EMS utilisation were compared over four time periods: lockdown (26 Mar 2020–12 May 2020); pre-lockdown (26 Feb 2020–25 Mar 2020); post-lockdown (13 May 2020–10 Jul 2020); and the year prior (26 Mar 2019–12 May 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess PCI trends within and between consecutive periods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The EMS utilisation for ACS during lockdown was higher compared with other periods: lockdown 39.4% vs pre-lockdown 29.7%; vs post-lockdown 33.6%; vs year prior 27.1%; all p&lt;0.01. Median daily PCI cases were similar: 31 (IQR 10, 38) during lockdown; 39 (15, 49) pre-lockdown; 39.5 (11, 44) post-lockdown; and, 42 (10, 49) the year prior; all p&gt;0.05. Median door-to-procedure time for ACS indication during lockdown was shorter at 3 hours (1.2, 20.6) vs pre-lockdown 3.9 (1.7, 21); vs post-lockdown 3.5 (1.5, 21.26); and, the year prior 3.5 (1.5, 23.7); all p&lt;0.05. Lockdown period was associated with lower odds for 30-day MACCE compared to pre-lockdown (odds ratio [OR] 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026); post-lockdown (OR 0.66; [0.40–1.06]; p=0.087); and the year prior (OR 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Contrary to international trends, EMS utilisation for ACS increased during lockdown but PCI volumes remained similar throughout the initial stages of the pandemic in Victoria, with no observed adverse effect on 30-day MACCE during lockdown. These data suggest that the public health response in Victoria was not associated with poorer quality cardiovascular care in patients receiving PCI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950624001562/pdfft?md5=50294154f5e86b60ec004088c245279a&pid=1-s2.0-S1443950624001562-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950624001562\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950624001562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 2020 年 COVID-19 封锁期间,急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)入院率和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)量均有所下降。在澳大利亚大流行的初期阶段,封锁对紧急医疗服务(EMS)利用率和PCI数量的影响尚未得到很好的描述:我们分析了维多利亚心脏结果登记处(VCOR)的数据,这是一个全州范围的 PCI 登记处,与维多利亚救护车急救服务登记处相连。我们比较了四个时间段内的 PCI 量、30 天主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE;死亡率、心肌梗死、支架血栓、非计划性血管再通和中风的复合指标)和 EMS 使用率:封锁期(2020 年 3 月 26 日至 2020 年 5 月 12 日);封锁期前(2020 年 2 月 26 日至 2020 年 3 月 25 日);封锁期后(2020 年 5 月 13 日至 2020 年 7 月 10 日);以及前一年(2019 年 3 月 26 日至 2019 年 5 月 12 日)。进行了间断时间序列分析,以评估连续时段内和时段间的PCI趋势:封锁期间 ACS 的 EMS 使用率高于其他时期:封锁期间 39.4% vs 封锁前 29.7%;封锁后 33.6%;前一年 27.1%;所有数据均为 P0.05。在封锁期间,ACS 指征的门到手术时间中位数为 3 小时(1.2, 20.6),封锁前为 3.9 小时(1.7, 21),封锁后为 3.5 小时(1.5, 21.26),前一年为 3.5 小时(1.5, 23.7);所有数据均为 0.05:与国际趋势相反,在维多利亚州的大流行初期,封锁期间因 ACS 而使用紧急医疗服务的人数有所增加,但 PCI 的使用量却保持相似,在封锁期间也未观察到对 30 天 MACCE 的不利影响。这些数据表明,维多利亚州的公共卫生响应与接受 PCI 的患者心血管护理质量较差无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Emergency Medical Service Utilisation, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume—An Australian Perspective

Background

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume declined during periods of COVID-19 lockdown internationally in 2020. The effect of lockdown on emergency medical service (EMS) utilisation, and PCI volume during the initial phase of the pandemic in Australia has not been well described.

Method

We analysed data from the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR), a state-wide PCI registry, linked with the Ambulance Victoria EMS registry. PCI volume, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularisation, and stroke), and EMS utilisation were compared over four time periods: lockdown (26 Mar 2020–12 May 2020); pre-lockdown (26 Feb 2020–25 Mar 2020); post-lockdown (13 May 2020–10 Jul 2020); and the year prior (26 Mar 2019–12 May 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was performed to assess PCI trends within and between consecutive periods.

Results

The EMS utilisation for ACS during lockdown was higher compared with other periods: lockdown 39.4% vs pre-lockdown 29.7%; vs post-lockdown 33.6%; vs year prior 27.1%; all p<0.01. Median daily PCI cases were similar: 31 (IQR 10, 38) during lockdown; 39 (15, 49) pre-lockdown; 39.5 (11, 44) post-lockdown; and, 42 (10, 49) the year prior; all p>0.05. Median door-to-procedure time for ACS indication during lockdown was shorter at 3 hours (1.2, 20.6) vs pre-lockdown 3.9 (1.7, 21); vs post-lockdown 3.5 (1.5, 21.26); and, the year prior 3.5 (1.5, 23.7); all p<0.05. Lockdown period was associated with lower odds for 30-day MACCE compared to pre-lockdown (odds ratio [OR] 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026); post-lockdown (OR 0.66; [0.40–1.06]; p=0.087); and the year prior (OR 0.55 [0.33–0.93]; p=0.026).

Conclusions

Contrary to international trends, EMS utilisation for ACS increased during lockdown but PCI volumes remained similar throughout the initial stages of the pandemic in Victoria, with no observed adverse effect on 30-day MACCE during lockdown. These data suggest that the public health response in Victoria was not associated with poorer quality cardiovascular care in patients receiving PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
期刊最新文献
Research Priorities for Atrial Fibrillation in Australia: A Statement From the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance Clinical Arrhythmia Theme. Editorial Board Impact of Diabetes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Within 48 Hours Effects of Smoking on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Appropriateness of ChatGPT in Answering Heart Failure Related Questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1