SPRINT 中的高敏肌钙蛋白 T、NT-proBNP 和认知结果。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22876
Devin Haney, Yuan Ma, Djhenne Dalmacy, Nicholas M Pajewski, Ihab Hajjar, James A de Lemos, Wenxin Zhang, Elsayed Z Soliman, Christie M Ballantyne, Vijay Nambi, Naveed Sattar, Anthony A Killeen, Joachim H Ix, Michael G Shlipak, Jarett D Berry, Simon B Ascher
{"title":"SPRINT 中的高敏肌钙蛋白 T、NT-proBNP 和认知结果。","authors":"Devin Haney, Yuan Ma, Djhenne Dalmacy, Nicholas M Pajewski, Ihab Hajjar, James A de Lemos, Wenxin Zhang, Elsayed Z Soliman, Christie M Ballantyne, Vijay Nambi, Naveed Sattar, Anthony A Killeen, Joachim H Ix, Michael G Shlipak, Jarett D Berry, Simon B Ascher","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hs-cTnT (cardiac troponin T measured with a highly sensitive assay) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) may identify adults with hypertension who derive greater cognitive benefits from lower systolic blood pressure targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) MIND study, participants were categorized as having both hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP in the lower 2 tertiles (n=4226), one in the highest tertile (n=2379), and both in the highest tertile (n=1506). We assessed the effect of intensive versus standard treatment on the composite of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or probable dementia (PD) across biomarker categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 830 of 8111 participants (10.2%) developed MCI or PD. Participants in the highest biomarker category were at higher risk of MCI or PD compared with those in the lowest category (hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.00-1.56]). The effect of intensive treatment on reducing the risk of MCI or PD was greater among participants in the lowest biomarker category (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.81]) than those in the intermediate (hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.80-1.28]) or highest categories (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.72-1.13]; <i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.02). The 5-year absolute risk differences in MCI or PD with intensive treatment were -2.9% (-4.4%, -1.3%), -0.2% (-3.0%, 2.6%), and -1.9% (-6.2%, 2.4%) in the lowest, intermediate, and highest biomarker categories, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In SPRINT, the relative effect of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering on preventing cognitive impairment appears to be stronger among participants with lower compared with higher cardiac biomarker levels, though the absolute risk reductions were similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Sensitivity Troponin T, NT-proBNP, and Cognitive Outcomes in SPRINT.\",\"authors\":\"Devin Haney, Yuan Ma, Djhenne Dalmacy, Nicholas M Pajewski, Ihab Hajjar, James A de Lemos, Wenxin Zhang, Elsayed Z Soliman, Christie M Ballantyne, Vijay Nambi, Naveed Sattar, Anthony A Killeen, Joachim H Ix, Michael G Shlipak, Jarett D Berry, Simon B Ascher\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hs-cTnT (cardiac troponin T measured with a highly sensitive assay) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) may identify adults with hypertension who derive greater cognitive benefits from lower systolic blood pressure targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) MIND study, participants were categorized as having both hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP in the lower 2 tertiles (n=4226), one in the highest tertile (n=2379), and both in the highest tertile (n=1506). We assessed the effect of intensive versus standard treatment on the composite of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or probable dementia (PD) across biomarker categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 830 of 8111 participants (10.2%) developed MCI or PD. Participants in the highest biomarker category were at higher risk of MCI or PD compared with those in the lowest category (hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.00-1.56]). The effect of intensive treatment on reducing the risk of MCI or PD was greater among participants in the lowest biomarker category (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.81]) than those in the intermediate (hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.80-1.28]) or highest categories (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.72-1.13]; <i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.02). The 5-year absolute risk differences in MCI or PD with intensive treatment were -2.9% (-4.4%, -1.3%), -0.2% (-3.0%, 2.6%), and -1.9% (-6.2%, 2.4%) in the lowest, intermediate, and highest biomarker categories, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In SPRINT, the relative effect of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering on preventing cognitive impairment appears to be stronger among participants with lower compared with higher cardiac biomarker levels, though the absolute risk reductions were similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Hs-cTnT(用高灵敏度测定法测量的心肌肌钙蛋白T)和NT-proBNP(N-末端前B型钠尿肽)可识别出从较低收缩压目标中获得更大认知益处的成人高血压患者:在SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)MIND研究中,参与者被分为hs-cTnT和NT-proBNP均处于较低的2个三分位数(n=4226)、一个处于最高的三分位数(n=2379)以及两个均处于最高的三分位数(n=1506)。我们评估了强化治疗与标准治疗对不同生物标志物类别的轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)或可能痴呆(PD)的复合影响:在5.1年的中位随访期间,8111名参与者中有830人(10.2%)出现了MCI或PD。与生物标志物类别最低的参与者相比,生物标志物类别最高的参与者患 MCI 或 PD 的风险更高(危险比为 1.34 [95% CI, 1.00-1.56])。强化治疗对降低MCI或PD风险的作用在生物标志物类别最低的参与者中(危险比为0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.81])大于中间类别(危险比为1.01 [95% CI, 0.80-1.28])或最高类别(危险比为0.90 [95% CI, 0.72-1.13];Pinteraction=0.02)的参与者。在最低、中间和最高生物标志物类别中,强化治疗的5年MCI或PD绝对风险差异分别为-2.9%(-4.4%,-1.3%)、-0.2%(-3.0%,2.6%)和-1.9%(-6.2%,2.4%):在 SPRINT 研究中,尽管绝对风险降低的程度相似,但在心脏生物标志物水平较低和较高的参与者中,强化降低收缩压对预防认知障碍的相对效果似乎更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-Sensitivity Troponin T, NT-proBNP, and Cognitive Outcomes in SPRINT.

Background: Hs-cTnT (cardiac troponin T measured with a highly sensitive assay) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) may identify adults with hypertension who derive greater cognitive benefits from lower systolic blood pressure targets.

Methods: In the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) MIND study, participants were categorized as having both hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP in the lower 2 tertiles (n=4226), one in the highest tertile (n=2379), and both in the highest tertile (n=1506). We assessed the effect of intensive versus standard treatment on the composite of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or probable dementia (PD) across biomarker categories.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 830 of 8111 participants (10.2%) developed MCI or PD. Participants in the highest biomarker category were at higher risk of MCI or PD compared with those in the lowest category (hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.00-1.56]). The effect of intensive treatment on reducing the risk of MCI or PD was greater among participants in the lowest biomarker category (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50-0.81]) than those in the intermediate (hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.80-1.28]) or highest categories (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.72-1.13]; Pinteraction=0.02). The 5-year absolute risk differences in MCI or PD with intensive treatment were -2.9% (-4.4%, -1.3%), -0.2% (-3.0%, 2.6%), and -1.9% (-6.2%, 2.4%) in the lowest, intermediate, and highest biomarker categories, respectively.

Conclusions: In SPRINT, the relative effect of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering on preventing cognitive impairment appears to be stronger among participants with lower compared with higher cardiac biomarker levels, though the absolute risk reductions were similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Evolutionary Characteristics in Primary Aldosteronism Patients. Rhythmic Contractions of Lymph Vessels and Lymph Flow Are Disrupted in Hypertensive Rats. Hyperadrenergic Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Clinical Biomarkers and Response to Guanfacine. Predictive and Diagnostic Value of the Angiogenic Proteins in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. GPER Stimulation Attenuates Cardiac Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1