Ustekinumab 和 Vedolizumab 在克罗恩病术后患者中作为术后预防和救援疗法的疗效:真实世界数据。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1093/ibd/izae137
Furkan U Ertem, Claudia Ramos Rivers, Amir Ali Ghaffari, Andrew R Watson, Gong Tang, Marc Schwartz, Elyse Johnston, Arthur Barrie, Janet Harrison, Jeffrey M Dueker, Doug Hartman, David G Binion
{"title":"Ustekinumab 和 Vedolizumab 在克罗恩病术后患者中作为术后预防和救援疗法的疗效:真实世界数据。","authors":"Furkan U Ertem, Claudia Ramos Rivers, Amir Ali Ghaffari, Andrew R Watson, Gong Tang, Marc Schwartz, Elyse Johnston, Arthur Barrie, Janet Harrison, Jeffrey M Dueker, Doug Hartman, David G Binion","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Almost half of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require bowel surgeries in their lifetime. Due to the high risk of postoperative disease recurrence and high rate of previous antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure, often alternative therapy options such as ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are used. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of UST and VDZ among postoperative CD patients as postoperative prophylaxis and rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consented CD patients who underwent initial ileocecal resection and were treated with UST and VDZ were included in this study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, endoscopy scores, and surgery outcomes were collected. Postoperative early CD recurrence was defined as a Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 within the first 2 years. The rescue therapy group was defined as patients who received either UST or VDZ after having Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2009 to 2019, 98 CD patients were treated with UST or VDZ postoperatively. Postoperative early recurrence rates were 5% (n = 1 out of 20) and 6% (1 out of 15) for the UST and VDZ groups, respectively. Two patients from the UST group and 1 patient from the VDZ group required bowel surgery during follow-up with median drug exposure of 51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29-61) and 30 (95% CI, 14-63) months, respectively; 55% and 69% of patients had at least 1 point of improvement on postoperative endoscopic Rutgeerts score, respectively, for UST and VDZ. Only 3 out of 40 and 1 out of 23 patients required bowel surgery during follow-up while receiving UST and VDZ as rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both UST and VDZ were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"461-466"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab Among Postoperative Crohn's Disease Patients as Postoperative Prophylaxis and Rescue Therapy: Real-world Data.\",\"authors\":\"Furkan U Ertem, Claudia Ramos Rivers, Amir Ali Ghaffari, Andrew R Watson, Gong Tang, Marc Schwartz, Elyse Johnston, Arthur Barrie, Janet Harrison, Jeffrey M Dueker, Doug Hartman, David G Binion\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izae137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Almost half of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require bowel surgeries in their lifetime. Due to the high risk of postoperative disease recurrence and high rate of previous antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure, often alternative therapy options such as ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are used. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of UST and VDZ among postoperative CD patients as postoperative prophylaxis and rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consented CD patients who underwent initial ileocecal resection and were treated with UST and VDZ were included in this study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, endoscopy scores, and surgery outcomes were collected. Postoperative early CD recurrence was defined as a Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 within the first 2 years. The rescue therapy group was defined as patients who received either UST or VDZ after having Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2009 to 2019, 98 CD patients were treated with UST or VDZ postoperatively. Postoperative early recurrence rates were 5% (n = 1 out of 20) and 6% (1 out of 15) for the UST and VDZ groups, respectively. Two patients from the UST group and 1 patient from the VDZ group required bowel surgery during follow-up with median drug exposure of 51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29-61) and 30 (95% CI, 14-63) months, respectively; 55% and 69% of patients had at least 1 point of improvement on postoperative endoscopic Rutgeerts score, respectively, for UST and VDZ. Only 3 out of 40 and 1 out of 23 patients required bowel surgery during follow-up while receiving UST and VDZ as rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both UST and VDZ were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"461-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几乎一半的克罗恩病(CD)患者一生中都需要进行肠道手术。由于术后疾病复发的风险很高,且之前的抗肿瘤坏死因子(antitumor necrosis factor,抗肿瘤坏死因子)治疗失败率也很高,因此通常会采用乌司替尼(ustekinumab,UST)和维妥珠单抗(vedolizumab,VDZ)等替代疗法。我们的目的是评估 UST 和 VDZ 作为术后预防和抢救疗法在 CD 患者中的疗效:本研究纳入了同意接受初次回盲部切除术并接受 UST 和 VDZ 治疗的 CD 患者。研究收集了患者的人口统计学资料、临床特征、医疗保健使用情况、内镜检查评分和手术结果。术后早期 CD 复发的定义是在最初两年内 Rutgeerts 内镜评分≥i2。抢救治疗组是指术后Rutgeerts内镜评分≥i2后接受UST或VDZ治疗的患者:2009年至2019年期间,98名CD患者术后接受了UST或VDZ治疗。UST组和VDZ组的术后早期复发率分别为5%(20例中有1例)和6%(15例中有1例)。随访期间,UST 组和 VDZ 组分别有 2 名和 1 名患者需要进行肠道手术,中位药物暴露时间分别为 51 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI],29-61)和 30 个月(95% 置信区间,14-63);UST 和 VDZ 组分别有 55% 和 69% 的患者术后内镜 Rutgeerts 评分至少提高了 1 分。在接受 UST 和 VDZ 作为抢救疗法的 40 名患者中,分别只有 3 名和 1 名患者在随访期间需要进行肠道手术:结论:UST 和 VDZ 作为术后预防或抢救疗法都很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab Among Postoperative Crohn's Disease Patients as Postoperative Prophylaxis and Rescue Therapy: Real-world Data.

Background: Almost half of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require bowel surgeries in their lifetime. Due to the high risk of postoperative disease recurrence and high rate of previous antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure, often alternative therapy options such as ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are used. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of UST and VDZ among postoperative CD patients as postoperative prophylaxis and rescue therapy.

Methods: Consented CD patients who underwent initial ileocecal resection and were treated with UST and VDZ were included in this study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, endoscopy scores, and surgery outcomes were collected. Postoperative early CD recurrence was defined as a Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 within the first 2 years. The rescue therapy group was defined as patients who received either UST or VDZ after having Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 postoperatively.

Results: During 2009 to 2019, 98 CD patients were treated with UST or VDZ postoperatively. Postoperative early recurrence rates were 5% (n = 1 out of 20) and 6% (1 out of 15) for the UST and VDZ groups, respectively. Two patients from the UST group and 1 patient from the VDZ group required bowel surgery during follow-up with median drug exposure of 51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29-61) and 30 (95% CI, 14-63) months, respectively; 55% and 69% of patients had at least 1 point of improvement on postoperative endoscopic Rutgeerts score, respectively, for UST and VDZ. Only 3 out of 40 and 1 out of 23 patients required bowel surgery during follow-up while receiving UST and VDZ as rescue therapy.

Conclusions: Both UST and VDZ were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
期刊最新文献
Erythrocyte Methotrexate-Polyglutamate Concentrations in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profile of Innate Cell Populations in Mesenteric Lymph Nodes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Placental Transfer of Upadacitinib Among Pregnant Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Addressing the Challenges of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Treatment: Prognosis Optimization Strategies in the Era of Precision Medicine. Impact of Psychosocial and Neurodevelopmental Disorders on Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1