妇科肿瘤学家将社交媒体用于学术和专业目的。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005573
Geetu Prakash Bhandoria, Aarthi S Jayraj, Shyamji Tiwari, Federico Migliorelli, Gregg Nelson, Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Martina Aida Angeles, Navya Nair, Houssein El Hajj, Nicolò Bizzarri
{"title":"妇科肿瘤学家将社交媒体用于学术和专业目的。","authors":"Geetu Prakash Bhandoria, Aarthi S Jayraj, Shyamji Tiwari, Federico Migliorelli, Gregg Nelson, Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Martina Aida Angeles, Navya Nair, Houssein El Hajj, Nicolò Bizzarri","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prevalence and patterns of social media use among gynecologic oncologists for professional and academic purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective online survey between November and December 2022 targeted gynecologic oncology practitioners (gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation/clinical oncologists, and onco-pathologists/pathologists). The survey, distributed via various social media platforms, included 40 questions to capture qualitative and quantitative data on social media use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 131 respondents from 32 countries, 106 (80.9%) were gynecologic oncologists and affiliated with academic institutions (84.7%). Facebook (n=110, 83.9%), Twitter (n= 108, 82.4%), and Instagram (n=100, 76.3%) were the most used platforms. Respondents used social media to stay updated (n=101, 77.1%), network (n=97, 74%), learn about conferences and webinars (n=97, 74%), and engage in academic discussions (n=84, 64.1%). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, 100/129 (77.5%) reported increased social media use. However, only 32 (24.4%) used it to connect with patients, and concerns were raised about privacy and the need for separate professional and personal accounts. A quarter of respondents hesitated to share their opinions on social media due to the fear of controversy, with 26 (20%) experiencing cyberbullying, yet 120/130 (92.3%) believed it enabled junior professionals to express their views. Concerns about differentiating valid content, information reliability, and the professional perception of sourcing knowledge from social media were noted. Gender, age, specialty, and income level influenced patterns of social media use, with variations in preferences for platforms, content engagement, and purposes, highlighting a complex landscape of social media interaction among gynecologic oncologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the use of social media among gynecologic oncologists is prevalent, particularly for academic and professional development, challenges such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the need for formal training in social media navigation persist. Tailored training programs and guidelines could enhance social media's effective and ethical use in this field, promoting a safe environment for professional expression and engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of social media for academic and professional purposes by gynecologic oncologists.\",\"authors\":\"Geetu Prakash Bhandoria, Aarthi S Jayraj, Shyamji Tiwari, Federico Migliorelli, Gregg Nelson, Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Martina Aida Angeles, Navya Nair, Houssein El Hajj, Nicolò Bizzarri\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prevalence and patterns of social media use among gynecologic oncologists for professional and academic purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective online survey between November and December 2022 targeted gynecologic oncology practitioners (gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation/clinical oncologists, and onco-pathologists/pathologists). The survey, distributed via various social media platforms, included 40 questions to capture qualitative and quantitative data on social media use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 131 respondents from 32 countries, 106 (80.9%) were gynecologic oncologists and affiliated with academic institutions (84.7%). Facebook (n=110, 83.9%), Twitter (n= 108, 82.4%), and Instagram (n=100, 76.3%) were the most used platforms. Respondents used social media to stay updated (n=101, 77.1%), network (n=97, 74%), learn about conferences and webinars (n=97, 74%), and engage in academic discussions (n=84, 64.1%). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, 100/129 (77.5%) reported increased social media use. However, only 32 (24.4%) used it to connect with patients, and concerns were raised about privacy and the need for separate professional and personal accounts. A quarter of respondents hesitated to share their opinions on social media due to the fear of controversy, with 26 (20%) experiencing cyberbullying, yet 120/130 (92.3%) believed it enabled junior professionals to express their views. Concerns about differentiating valid content, information reliability, and the professional perception of sourcing knowledge from social media were noted. Gender, age, specialty, and income level influenced patterns of social media use, with variations in preferences for platforms, content engagement, and purposes, highlighting a complex landscape of social media interaction among gynecologic oncologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the use of social media among gynecologic oncologists is prevalent, particularly for academic and professional development, challenges such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the need for formal training in social media navigation persist. Tailored training programs and guidelines could enhance social media's effective and ethical use in this field, promoting a safe environment for professional expression and engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005573\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查妇科肿瘤学家出于专业和学术目的使用社交媒体的普遍程度和模式:在 2022 年 11 月至 12 月期间,针对妇科肿瘤从业人员(妇科肿瘤学家、肿瘤外科医生、肿瘤内科医生、放射/临床肿瘤学家以及肿瘤病理学家/病理学家)进行了一项前瞻性在线调查。调查通过各种社交媒体平台发布,包括 40 个问题,以获取社交媒体使用的定性和定量数据:在来自 32 个国家的 131 位受访者中,106 位(80.9%)是妇科肿瘤专家,隶属于学术机构(84.7%)。Facebook(n=110,83.9%)、Twitter(n=108,82.4%)和 Instagram(n=100,76.3%)是受访者使用最多的平台。受访者使用社交媒体来了解最新信息(人数=101,77.1%)、建立联系(人数=97,74%)、了解会议和网络研讨会(人数=97,74%)以及参与学术讨论(人数=84,64.1%)。COVID-19 大流行之后,100/129(77.5%)人报告说社交媒体的使用有所增加。然而,只有 32 位受访者(24.4%)使用社交媒体与患者联系,他们还对隐私以及是否需要将专业账户和个人账户分开表示担忧。四分之一的受访者因担心争议而不愿在社交媒体上分享自己的观点,26 人(20%)曾遭遇网络欺凌,但 120/130 人(92.3%)认为社交媒体使初级专业人员能够表达自己的观点。人们还关注有效内容的区分、信息的可靠性以及从社交媒体获取知识的专业认知。性别、年龄、专业和收入水平影响着社交媒体的使用模式,对平台、内容参与和目的的偏好各不相同,凸显了妇科肿瘤专家在社交媒体互动方面的复杂情况:尽管妇科肿瘤学家普遍使用社交媒体,尤其是在学术和职业发展方面,但网络欺凌、隐私问题以及社交媒体导航方面的正规培训需求等挑战依然存在。量身定制的培训计划和指南可以提高社交媒体在该领域的使用效率和道德水平,促进专业表达和参与的安全环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of social media for academic and professional purposes by gynecologic oncologists.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and patterns of social media use among gynecologic oncologists for professional and academic purposes.

Methods: A prospective online survey between November and December 2022 targeted gynecologic oncology practitioners (gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation/clinical oncologists, and onco-pathologists/pathologists). The survey, distributed via various social media platforms, included 40 questions to capture qualitative and quantitative data on social media use.

Results: Of 131 respondents from 32 countries, 106 (80.9%) were gynecologic oncologists and affiliated with academic institutions (84.7%). Facebook (n=110, 83.9%), Twitter (n= 108, 82.4%), and Instagram (n=100, 76.3%) were the most used platforms. Respondents used social media to stay updated (n=101, 77.1%), network (n=97, 74%), learn about conferences and webinars (n=97, 74%), and engage in academic discussions (n=84, 64.1%). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, 100/129 (77.5%) reported increased social media use. However, only 32 (24.4%) used it to connect with patients, and concerns were raised about privacy and the need for separate professional and personal accounts. A quarter of respondents hesitated to share their opinions on social media due to the fear of controversy, with 26 (20%) experiencing cyberbullying, yet 120/130 (92.3%) believed it enabled junior professionals to express their views. Concerns about differentiating valid content, information reliability, and the professional perception of sourcing knowledge from social media were noted. Gender, age, specialty, and income level influenced patterns of social media use, with variations in preferences for platforms, content engagement, and purposes, highlighting a complex landscape of social media interaction among gynecologic oncologists.

Conclusion: While the use of social media among gynecologic oncologists is prevalent, particularly for academic and professional development, challenges such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the need for formal training in social media navigation persist. Tailored training programs and guidelines could enhance social media's effective and ethical use in this field, promoting a safe environment for professional expression and engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy intra-operative evaluation in ovarian cancer: definition of in vivo architectural patterns to determine resection strategies. Wunderlich syndrome as a presenting symptom in cervical cancer. High-grade serous ovarian cancer-bridging the gap between epidemiology and prevention with biology. Circulating tumor DNA in endometrial cancer: clinical significance and implications. Estimating high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma in the era of tubal hypothesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1