混合人工椎间盘或零轮廓装置治疗 ACDF 翻修手术中单级相邻节段退变的生物力学分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurospine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2347330.665
Weishi Liang, Yihan Yang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Peng Yin, Yong Hai
{"title":"混合人工椎间盘或零轮廓装置治疗 ACDF 翻修手术中单级相邻节段退变的生物力学分析。","authors":"Weishi Liang, Yihan Yang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Peng Yin, Yong Hai","doi":"10.14245/ns.2347330.665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical hybrid surgery optimizes the use of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and zero-profile (ZOP) devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) but lacks uniform combination and biomechanical standards, especially in revision surgery (RS). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent segments of the different hybrid RS constructs in ACDF RS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An intact 3-dimensional finite element model generated a normal cervical spine (C2-T1). This model was modified to the primary C5-6 ACDF model. Three RS models were created to treat C4-5 adjacent segment degeneration through implanting cages plus plates (Cage-Cage), ZOP devices (ZOP-Cage), or Bryan discs (CDA-Cage). A 1.0-Nm moment was applied to the primary C5-6 ACDF model to generate total C2-T1 range of motions (ROMs). Subsequently, a displacement load was applied to all RS models to match the total C2-T1 ROMs of the primary ACDF model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ZOP-Cage model showed lower biomechanical responses including ROM, intradiscal pressure, maximum von Mises stress in discs, and facet joint force in adjacent segments compared to the Cage-Cage model. The CDA-Cage model exhibited the lowest biomechanical responses and ROM ratio at adjacent segments among all RS models, closely approached or lower than those in the primary ACDF model in most motion directions. Additionally, the maximum von Mises stress on the C3-4 and C6-7 discs increased in the Cage-Cage and ZOP-Cage models but decreased in the CDA-Cage model when compared to the primary ACDF model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CDA-Cage construct had the lowest biomechanical responses with minimal kinematic change of adjacent segments. ZOP-Cage is the next best choice, especially if CDA is not suitable. This study provides a biomechanical reference for clinical hybrid RS decision-making to reduce the risk of ASD recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"21 2","pages":"606-619"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Weishi Liang, Yihan Yang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Peng Yin, Yong Hai\",\"doi\":\"10.14245/ns.2347330.665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical hybrid surgery optimizes the use of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and zero-profile (ZOP) devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) but lacks uniform combination and biomechanical standards, especially in revision surgery (RS). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent segments of the different hybrid RS constructs in ACDF RS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An intact 3-dimensional finite element model generated a normal cervical spine (C2-T1). This model was modified to the primary C5-6 ACDF model. Three RS models were created to treat C4-5 adjacent segment degeneration through implanting cages plus plates (Cage-Cage), ZOP devices (ZOP-Cage), or Bryan discs (CDA-Cage). A 1.0-Nm moment was applied to the primary C5-6 ACDF model to generate total C2-T1 range of motions (ROMs). Subsequently, a displacement load was applied to all RS models to match the total C2-T1 ROMs of the primary ACDF model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ZOP-Cage model showed lower biomechanical responses including ROM, intradiscal pressure, maximum von Mises stress in discs, and facet joint force in adjacent segments compared to the Cage-Cage model. The CDA-Cage model exhibited the lowest biomechanical responses and ROM ratio at adjacent segments among all RS models, closely approached or lower than those in the primary ACDF model in most motion directions. Additionally, the maximum von Mises stress on the C3-4 and C6-7 discs increased in the Cage-Cage and ZOP-Cage models but decreased in the CDA-Cage model when compared to the primary ACDF model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CDA-Cage construct had the lowest biomechanical responses with minimal kinematic change of adjacent segments. ZOP-Cage is the next best choice, especially if CDA is not suitable. This study provides a biomechanical reference for clinical hybrid RS decision-making to reduce the risk of ASD recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurospine\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"606-619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurospine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2347330.665\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2347330.665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颈椎混合手术优化了颈椎间盘关节成形术(CDA)和零轮廓(ZOP)器械在颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术(ACDF)中的应用,但缺乏统一的组合和生物力学标准,尤其是在翻修手术(RS)中。本研究旨在探讨 ACDF RS 中不同混合 RS 构架相邻节段的生物力学特征:一个完整的三维有限元模型生成了一个正常的颈椎(C2-T1)。该模型被修改为主要的 C5-6 ACDF 模型。创建了三个RS模型,通过植入笼加板(Cage-Cage)、ZOP装置(ZOP-Cage)或布莱恩椎间盘(CDA-Cage)来治疗C4-5邻近节段退变。对主要的 C5-6 ACDF 模型施加 1.0-Nm 的力矩,以产生 C2-T1 的总运动范围 (ROM)。随后,对所有 RS 模型施加位移载荷,使其与主 ACDF 模型的 C2-T1 总 ROM 相匹配:结果:与Cage-Cage模型相比,ZOP-Cage模型显示出较低的生物力学反应,包括ROM、椎间盘内压、椎间盘最大von Mises应力和相邻节段的面关节力。在所有 RS 模型中,CDA-Cage 模型的生物力学反应和相邻节段的 ROM 比率最低,在大多数运动方向上接近或低于主要 ACDF 模型。此外,与初级 ACDF 模型相比,Cage-Cage 模型和 ZOP-Cage 模型中 C3-4 和 C6-7 椎间盘的最大 von Mises 应力有所增加,而 CDA-Cage 模型则有所减少:结论:CDA-Cage结构的生物力学反应最低,相邻节段的运动学变化最小。结论:CDA-Cage 结构的生物力学反应最低,相邻节段的运动学变化最小。ZOP-Cage 是下一个最佳选择,尤其是在不适合 CDA 的情况下。这项研究为临床混合RS决策提供了生物力学参考,以降低ASD复发的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery.

Objective: Cervical hybrid surgery optimizes the use of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and zero-profile (ZOP) devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) but lacks uniform combination and biomechanical standards, especially in revision surgery (RS). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent segments of the different hybrid RS constructs in ACDF RS.

Methods: An intact 3-dimensional finite element model generated a normal cervical spine (C2-T1). This model was modified to the primary C5-6 ACDF model. Three RS models were created to treat C4-5 adjacent segment degeneration through implanting cages plus plates (Cage-Cage), ZOP devices (ZOP-Cage), or Bryan discs (CDA-Cage). A 1.0-Nm moment was applied to the primary C5-6 ACDF model to generate total C2-T1 range of motions (ROMs). Subsequently, a displacement load was applied to all RS models to match the total C2-T1 ROMs of the primary ACDF model.

Results: The ZOP-Cage model showed lower biomechanical responses including ROM, intradiscal pressure, maximum von Mises stress in discs, and facet joint force in adjacent segments compared to the Cage-Cage model. The CDA-Cage model exhibited the lowest biomechanical responses and ROM ratio at adjacent segments among all RS models, closely approached or lower than those in the primary ACDF model in most motion directions. Additionally, the maximum von Mises stress on the C3-4 and C6-7 discs increased in the Cage-Cage and ZOP-Cage models but decreased in the CDA-Cage model when compared to the primary ACDF model.

Conclusion: The CDA-Cage construct had the lowest biomechanical responses with minimal kinematic change of adjacent segments. ZOP-Cage is the next best choice, especially if CDA is not suitable. This study provides a biomechanical reference for clinical hybrid RS decision-making to reduce the risk of ASD recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Self-Developed Mobility Augmented Reality System Versus Conventional X-rays for Spine Positioning in Intraspinal Tumor Surgery: A Case-Control Study. An Experimental Model for Fluid Dynamics and Pressures During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Application of the "Klotski Technique" in Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With En Bloc Type Dura Ossification. Artificial Intelligence Detection of Cervical Spine Fractures Using Convolutional Neural Network Models. Biomechanical Study of Atlanto-occipital Instability in Type II Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1