肾移植后抗体介导的排斥反应中 M1 和 M2 巨噬细胞浸润的作用

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Transplant immunology Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1016/j.trim.2024.102076
Xiaoxiao Shao
{"title":"肾移植后抗体介导的排斥反应中 M1 和 M2 巨噬细胞浸润的作用","authors":"Xiaoxiao Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to analyze the roles of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration in post-renal transplant antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 102 recipients who underwent renal allotransplant from January 2020 to February 2023 were divided into an immune tolerance group (<em>n</em> = 56) and a rejection group (<em>n</em> = 46). The transplant renal biopsy specimens were harvested by ultrasound-guided puncture. The M1 and M2 macrophages in renal tissues were counted, and the M1/M2 ratio was calculated. The numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratios in patients with different severities of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and different degrees of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration were compared. The predictive values of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio for post-renal transplant AMR were clarified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rejection group had significantly more M1 and M2 macrophages and higher M1/M2 ratio than those of the immune tolerance group (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.05). In the rejection group, infiltrating macrophages were mainly distributed in the glomerular and interstitial capillaries, with M1 macrophages being the predominant type. With increasing severity of IF/TA, the numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio rose in patients with post-renal transplant AMR (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.05). The numbers and ratio had significant positive correlations with the levels of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.05). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of numbers and M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio for predicting post-renal transplant AMR were 0.856, 0.839 and 0.887, respectively. The combined detection had AUC of 0.911 (95% CI: 0.802–0.986), sensitivity of 90.43% and specificity of 83.42%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant macrophage infiltration is present in the case of post-renal transplant AMR, and closely related to the severity of IF/TA and the degree of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23304,"journal":{"name":"Transplant immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roles of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration in post-renal transplant antibody-mediated rejection\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to analyze the roles of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration in post-renal transplant antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 102 recipients who underwent renal allotransplant from January 2020 to February 2023 were divided into an immune tolerance group (<em>n</em> = 56) and a rejection group (<em>n</em> = 46). The transplant renal biopsy specimens were harvested by ultrasound-guided puncture. The M1 and M2 macrophages in renal tissues were counted, and the M1/M2 ratio was calculated. The numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratios in patients with different severities of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and different degrees of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration were compared. The predictive values of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio for post-renal transplant AMR were clarified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rejection group had significantly more M1 and M2 macrophages and higher M1/M2 ratio than those of the immune tolerance group (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.05). In the rejection group, infiltrating macrophages were mainly distributed in the glomerular and interstitial capillaries, with M1 macrophages being the predominant type. With increasing severity of IF/TA, the numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio rose in patients with post-renal transplant AMR (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.05). The numbers and ratio had significant positive correlations with the levels of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine (<em>P &lt;</em> 0.05). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of numbers and M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio for predicting post-renal transplant AMR were 0.856, 0.839 and 0.887, respectively. The combined detection had AUC of 0.911 (95% CI: 0.802–0.986), sensitivity of 90.43% and specificity of 83.42%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant macrophage infiltration is present in the case of post-renal transplant AMR, and closely related to the severity of IF/TA and the degree of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966327424000923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966327424000923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们旨在分析M1和M2巨噬细胞在肾移植后抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)中的作用:我们旨在分析M1和M2巨噬细胞浸润在肾移植后抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)中的作用:方法:将2020年1月至2023年2月期间接受肾移植的102名受者分为免疫耐受组(56人)和排斥反应组(46人)。移植肾活检标本由超声引导穿刺采集。对肾组织中的 M1 和 M2 巨噬细胞进行计数,并计算 M1/M2 比率。比较了不同程度的肾间质纤维化/肾小管萎缩(IF/TA)和不同程度的肾小管间质炎症细胞浸润患者的 M1 和 M2 巨噬细胞数量以及 M1/M2 比率。结果发现,肾移植后AMR的M1和M2巨噬细胞以及M1/M2比值的预测价值明显高于肾移植后AMR:结果:与免疫耐受组相比,排斥反应组的 M1 和 M2 巨噬细胞明显较多,M1/M2 比率也较高:肾移植术后AMR存在明显的巨噬细胞浸润,且与IF/TA的严重程度和肾小管间质炎症细胞浸润程度密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Roles of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration in post-renal transplant antibody-mediated rejection

Background

We aimed to analyze the roles of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration in post-renal transplant antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

Methods

A total of 102 recipients who underwent renal allotransplant from January 2020 to February 2023 were divided into an immune tolerance group (n = 56) and a rejection group (n = 46). The transplant renal biopsy specimens were harvested by ultrasound-guided puncture. The M1 and M2 macrophages in renal tissues were counted, and the M1/M2 ratio was calculated. The numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratios in patients with different severities of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and different degrees of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration were compared. The predictive values of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio for post-renal transplant AMR were clarified.

Results

The rejection group had significantly more M1 and M2 macrophages and higher M1/M2 ratio than those of the immune tolerance group (P < 0.05). In the rejection group, infiltrating macrophages were mainly distributed in the glomerular and interstitial capillaries, with M1 macrophages being the predominant type. With increasing severity of IF/TA, the numbers of M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio rose in patients with post-renal transplant AMR (P < 0.05). The numbers and ratio had significant positive correlations with the levels of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine (P < 0.05). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of numbers and M1 and M2 macrophages and M1/M2 ratio for predicting post-renal transplant AMR were 0.856, 0.839 and 0.887, respectively. The combined detection had AUC of 0.911 (95% CI: 0.802–0.986), sensitivity of 90.43% and specificity of 83.42%.

Conclusions

Significant macrophage infiltration is present in the case of post-renal transplant AMR, and closely related to the severity of IF/TA and the degree of tubulointerstitial inflammatory cell infiltration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant immunology
Transplant immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Transplant Immunology will publish up-to-date information on all aspects of the broad field it encompasses. The journal will be directed at (basic) scientists, tissue typers, transplant physicians and surgeons, and research and data on all immunological aspects of organ-, tissue- and (haematopoietic) stem cell transplantation are of potential interest to the readers of Transplant Immunology. Original papers, Review articles and Hypotheses will be considered for publication and submitted manuscripts will be rapidly peer-reviewed and published. They will be judged on the basis of scientific merit, originality, timeliness and quality.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of new-onset BK viruria in post-renal transplant recipients by quantitative PCR. Efficacy of Ruxolitinib with corticosteroids in idiopathic pneumonia syndrome post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center experience and systematic review. S100A9 regulates M1 macrophage polarization and exacerbates steatotic liver ischemia-reperfusion injury. The status of diversity in the heart transplant workforce. Post-transplantation monitoring and quantitation of microparticles in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1