Nishant R Antony, Subash Sundarsingh, Anil Radhakrishnan, Swapna Sasidharan
{"title":"心脏手术右颈内静脉导管插入术中经食道超声心动图探头作为体表探头与血管探头的比较","authors":"Nishant R Antony, Subash Sundarsingh, Anil Radhakrishnan, Swapna Sasidharan","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_37_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>USG vascular probe and TEE probe can help during central venous catheterization (CVC) and can confirm the location of guide wire in the neck vessels. We proposed this study, as there are only few studies comparing between TEE probe as surface probe and USG vascular probe for right IJV cannulation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the TEE probe as a surface probe and USG vascular probe during right IJV catheterization in cardiac surgeries.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Prospective, comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>One twenty-four patients of either sex posted for major elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups (TEE group and USG group) of 62 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group. The goal of this study was to compare the puncture time, visualization of IJV to first successful puncture, quality of the imaging with needle tip positioning, and catheter positioning using both TEE probe and vascular probe. The primary outcome was comparison of time from visualization of the IJV to successful puncture using both TEE probe as a surface probe and vascular probe. Secondary outcome was to compare the quality of image with respect to needle tip positioning and compare quality of image with respect to catheter position using both probes.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed by using a statistical software package SPSS, version 20.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation and results of our study clearly show the feasibility of TEE as surface probe for guiding central venous catheter in right IJV just like the vascular linear probe. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistical differences were found in the puncture time, image quality, needle tip positioning, wire positioning, and catheter positioning between the two groups. All the P values were greater than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEE probe can be used as an alternative method to guide IJV puncturing and catheterization when the vascular probe is not available. It is feasible especially in cardiac surgeries where the TEE monitoring machine is a must in modern anesthesia and readily available than an ultrasound machine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe as Surface Probe with Vascular Probe During Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization in Cardiac Surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"Nishant R Antony, Subash Sundarsingh, Anil Radhakrishnan, Swapna Sasidharan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aca.aca_37_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>USG vascular probe and TEE probe can help during central venous catheterization (CVC) and can confirm the location of guide wire in the neck vessels. We proposed this study, as there are only few studies comparing between TEE probe as surface probe and USG vascular probe for right IJV cannulation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the TEE probe as a surface probe and USG vascular probe during right IJV catheterization in cardiac surgeries.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Prospective, comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>One twenty-four patients of either sex posted for major elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups (TEE group and USG group) of 62 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group. The goal of this study was to compare the puncture time, visualization of IJV to first successful puncture, quality of the imaging with needle tip positioning, and catheter positioning using both TEE probe and vascular probe. The primary outcome was comparison of time from visualization of the IJV to successful puncture using both TEE probe as a surface probe and vascular probe. Secondary outcome was to compare the quality of image with respect to needle tip positioning and compare quality of image with respect to catheter position using both probes.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed by using a statistical software package SPSS, version 20.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation and results of our study clearly show the feasibility of TEE as surface probe for guiding central venous catheter in right IJV just like the vascular linear probe. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistical differences were found in the puncture time, image quality, needle tip positioning, wire positioning, and catheter positioning between the two groups. All the P values were greater than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEE probe can be used as an alternative method to guide IJV puncturing and catheterization when the vascular probe is not available. It is feasible especially in cardiac surgeries where the TEE monitoring machine is a must in modern anesthesia and readily available than an ultrasound machine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315267/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_37_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_37_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:USG 血管探头和 TEE 探头有助于中心静脉导管插入术(CVC),并能确认颈部血管中导丝的位置。我们提出了这项研究,因为在右侧 IJV 插管术中,将 TEE 探头作为表面探头与 USG 血管探头进行比较的研究很少。目的:在心脏手术的右侧 IJV 导管插入术中,比较将 TEE 探头作为表面探头与 USG 血管探头:设置和设计:前瞻性比较研究:本研究纳入了 124 名接受择期心脏大手术的男女患者。将患者分为两组(TEE 组和 USG 组),每组 62 人。本研究的目的是比较穿刺时间、从首次成功穿刺到看到 IJV 的时间、针尖定位的成像质量以及使用 TEE 探头和血管探头的导管定位。主要结果是比较 TEE 探针作为表面探针和血管探针从看到 IJV 到穿刺成功的时间。次要结果是比较针尖定位的图像质量,以及使用两种探头比较导管位置的图像质量:采用的统计分析方法:使用 SPSS 20.0 版统计软件包进行统计分析:我们的观察和研究结果清楚地表明,与血管线性探头一样,TEE 作为表面探头引导右侧 IJV 中心静脉导管是可行的。两组之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组在穿刺时间、图像质量、针尖定位、导线定位和导管定位方面均无统计学差异。所有 P 值均大于 0.05:在没有血管探针的情况下,TEE 探头可作为指导 IJV 穿刺和导管插入的替代方法。这种方法是可行的,尤其是在心脏手术中,因为 TEE 监测机是现代麻醉的必备设备,而且比超声波机更容易获得。
Comparison of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe as Surface Probe with Vascular Probe During Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization in Cardiac Surgeries.
Context: USG vascular probe and TEE probe can help during central venous catheterization (CVC) and can confirm the location of guide wire in the neck vessels. We proposed this study, as there are only few studies comparing between TEE probe as surface probe and USG vascular probe for right IJV cannulation.
Aims: To compare the TEE probe as a surface probe and USG vascular probe during right IJV catheterization in cardiac surgeries.
Settings and design: Prospective, comparative study.
Methods and material: One twenty-four patients of either sex posted for major elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups (TEE group and USG group) of 62 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group. The goal of this study was to compare the puncture time, visualization of IJV to first successful puncture, quality of the imaging with needle tip positioning, and catheter positioning using both TEE probe and vascular probe. The primary outcome was comparison of time from visualization of the IJV to successful puncture using both TEE probe as a surface probe and vascular probe. Secondary outcome was to compare the quality of image with respect to needle tip positioning and compare quality of image with respect to catheter position using both probes.
Statistical analysis used: Statistical analyses were performed by using a statistical software package SPSS, version 20.0.
Results: The observation and results of our study clearly show the feasibility of TEE as surface probe for guiding central venous catheter in right IJV just like the vascular linear probe. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistical differences were found in the puncture time, image quality, needle tip positioning, wire positioning, and catheter positioning between the two groups. All the P values were greater than 0.05.
Conclusions: The TEE probe can be used as an alternative method to guide IJV puncturing and catheterization when the vascular probe is not available. It is feasible especially in cardiac surgeries where the TEE monitoring machine is a must in modern anesthesia and readily available than an ultrasound machine.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.