Andrea Ponsiglione, Will McGuire, Giuseppe Petralia, Marie Fennessy, Thomas Benkert, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Anwar R Padhani
{"title":"比较深度学习加速序列和传统序列的全身弥散 MR 图像质量。","authors":"Andrea Ponsiglione, Will McGuire, Giuseppe Petralia, Marie Fennessy, Thomas Benkert, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Anwar R Padhani","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm<sup>2</sup> and the corresponding maximum intensity projections (MIP) of deep resolve boost (DRB) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences (time of acquisition: 6:42 min) against conventional sequences (time of acquisition: 14 min). Readers assessed paired images for noise, artefacts, signal fat suppression, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales, also expressing their overall subjective preference. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of normal tissues and cancer lesions were statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). In qualitative assessments, axial DRB images were preferred (preferred/strongly preferred) in 56-100% of cases, whereas DRB MIP images were favoured in 52-96% of cases. DRB-SNR/CNR was higher in all normal tissues (p < 0.05). For cancer lesions, the DRB-SNR was higher (p < 0.001), but the CNR was not different. DRB-ADC values were significantly higher for the brain and psoas muscles, but not for cancer lesions (mean difference: + 53 µm<sup>2</sup>/s). Inter-class correlation coefficient analysis showed good to excellent agreement (95% CI 0.75-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7985-7993"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Ponsiglione, Will McGuire, Giuseppe Petralia, Marie Fennessy, Thomas Benkert, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Anwar R Padhani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm<sup>2</sup> and the corresponding maximum intensity projections (MIP) of deep resolve boost (DRB) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences (time of acquisition: 6:42 min) against conventional sequences (time of acquisition: 14 min). Readers assessed paired images for noise, artefacts, signal fat suppression, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales, also expressing their overall subjective preference. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of normal tissues and cancer lesions were statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). In qualitative assessments, axial DRB images were preferred (preferred/strongly preferred) in 56-100% of cases, whereas DRB MIP images were favoured in 52-96% of cases. DRB-SNR/CNR was higher in all normal tissues (p < 0.05). For cancer lesions, the DRB-SNR was higher (p < 0.001), but the CNR was not different. DRB-ADC values were significantly higher for the brain and psoas muscles, but not for cancer lesions (mean difference: + 53 µm<sup>2</sup>/s). Inter-class correlation coefficient analysis showed good to excellent agreement (95% CI 0.75-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7985-7993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.
Objectives: To compare the image quality of deep learning accelerated whole-body (WB) with conventional diffusion sequences.
Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with bone marrow cancer underwent WB-MRI. Two experts compared axial b900 s/mm2 and the corresponding maximum intensity projections (MIP) of deep resolve boost (DRB) accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences (time of acquisition: 6:42 min) against conventional sequences (time of acquisition: 14 min). Readers assessed paired images for noise, artefacts, signal fat suppression, and lesion conspicuity using Likert scales, also expressing their overall subjective preference. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of normal tissues and cancer lesions were statistically compared.
Results: Overall, radiologists preferred either axial DRB b900 and/or corresponding MIP images in almost 80% of the patients, particularly in patients with a high body-mass index (BMI > 25 kg/m2). In qualitative assessments, axial DRB images were preferred (preferred/strongly preferred) in 56-100% of cases, whereas DRB MIP images were favoured in 52-96% of cases. DRB-SNR/CNR was higher in all normal tissues (p < 0.05). For cancer lesions, the DRB-SNR was higher (p < 0.001), but the CNR was not different. DRB-ADC values were significantly higher for the brain and psoas muscles, but not for cancer lesions (mean difference: + 53 µm2/s). Inter-class correlation coefficient analysis showed good to excellent agreement (95% CI 0.75-0.93).
Conclusion: DRB sequences produce higher-quality axial DWI, resulting in improved MIPs and significantly reduced acquisition times. However, differences in the ADC values of normal tissues need to be considered.
Clinical relevance statement: Deep learning accelerated diffusion sequences produce high-quality axial images and MIP at reduced acquisition times. This advancement could enable the increased adoption of Whole Body-MRI for the evaluation of patients with bone marrow cancer.
Key points: Deep learning reconstruction enables a more than 50% reduction in acquisition time for WB diffusion sequences. DRB images were preferred by radiologists in almost 80% of cases due to fewer artefacts, improved background signal suppression, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and increased lesion conspicuity in patients with higher body mass index. Cancer lesion diffusivity from DRB images was not different from conventional sequences.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.