基于客观测量的 ACGIH 手部活动 TLV 值与建议的腕部速度和前臂肌肉负荷行动水平之间的一致性:以装配业为例。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2024.2367367
Camilla Dahlqvist, Inger Arvidsson, Lotta Löfqvist, Jenny Gremark Simonsen
{"title":"基于客观测量的 ACGIH 手部活动 TLV 值与建议的腕部速度和前臂肌肉负荷行动水平之间的一致性:以装配业为例。","authors":"Camilla Dahlqvist, Inger Arvidsson, Lotta Löfqvist, Jenny Gremark Simonsen","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2367367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> This study aimed to investigate the consistency between results of the American Conference for Governmental Occupational Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand activity and proposed action levels of objective measurements in risk assessments of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. <i>Methods.</i> Wrist velocities and forearm muscular load were measured for 11 assemblers during one working day. Simultaneously, each assembler's hand activity level (HAL) during three sub-cycles was rated twice on two separate occasions by two experts, using a HAL scale. Arm/hand exertion was also rated by the assemblers themselves using a Borg scale. In total, 66 sub-cycles were assessed and assigned to three exposure categories: A) below ACGIH action limit (AL) (green); B) between AL and TLV (yellow); and C) above TLV (red). The median wrist velocity and the 90<sup>th</sup> percentile of forearm muscular load obtained from the objective measurements corresponding to the sub-cycles were calculated and assigned to two exposure categories: A) below or C) above the proposed action level. <i>Results.</i> The agreement between ACGIH TLV for hand activity and the proposed action level for wrist velocity was 87%. <i>Conclusions.</i> The proposed action level for wrist velocity is highly consistent with the TLV. Additional studies are needed to confirm the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency between the ACGIH TLV for hand activity and proposed action levels for wrist velocity and forearm muscular load based on objective measurements: an example from the assembly industry.\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Dahlqvist, Inger Arvidsson, Lotta Löfqvist, Jenny Gremark Simonsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10803548.2024.2367367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> This study aimed to investigate the consistency between results of the American Conference for Governmental Occupational Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand activity and proposed action levels of objective measurements in risk assessments of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. <i>Methods.</i> Wrist velocities and forearm muscular load were measured for 11 assemblers during one working day. Simultaneously, each assembler's hand activity level (HAL) during three sub-cycles was rated twice on two separate occasions by two experts, using a HAL scale. Arm/hand exertion was also rated by the assemblers themselves using a Borg scale. In total, 66 sub-cycles were assessed and assigned to three exposure categories: A) below ACGIH action limit (AL) (green); B) between AL and TLV (yellow); and C) above TLV (red). The median wrist velocity and the 90<sup>th</sup> percentile of forearm muscular load obtained from the objective measurements corresponding to the sub-cycles were calculated and assigned to two exposure categories: A) below or C) above the proposed action level. <i>Results.</i> The agreement between ACGIH TLV for hand activity and the proposed action level for wrist velocity was 87%. <i>Conclusions.</i> The proposed action level for wrist velocity is highly consistent with the TLV. Additional studies are needed to confirm the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2367367\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2367367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在调查手部活动的美国政府职业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)阈限值(TLV)结果与工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病风险评估中客观测量的建议行动水平之间的一致性。方法。对 11 名装配工在一个工作日内的腕部速度和前臂肌肉负荷进行了测量。同时,每名装配工在三个小周期内的手部活动水平(HAL)由两名专家使用 HAL 量表进行两次评分。装配工本人也使用博格量表对手臂/手的用力程度进行评分。总共对 66 个子周期进行了评估,并将其划分为三个暴露类别:A) 低于 ACGIH 行动限值 (AL)(绿色);B) 介于 ACGIH 行动限值和 TLV 之间(黄色);C) 高于 TLV(红色)。计算与子周期相对应的客观测量值得出的腕部速度中位数和前臂肌肉负荷第 90 百分位数,并将其归入两个暴露类别:A) 低于或 C) 高于建议的行动水平。结果。手部活动 ACGIH TLV 与建议的腕部速度行动水平之间的一致性为 87%。结论。建议的腕部速度行动水平与 TLV 高度一致。需要进行更多的研究来确认结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency between the ACGIH TLV for hand activity and proposed action levels for wrist velocity and forearm muscular load based on objective measurements: an example from the assembly industry.

Objectives. This study aimed to investigate the consistency between results of the American Conference for Governmental Occupational Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand activity and proposed action levels of objective measurements in risk assessments of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Methods. Wrist velocities and forearm muscular load were measured for 11 assemblers during one working day. Simultaneously, each assembler's hand activity level (HAL) during three sub-cycles was rated twice on two separate occasions by two experts, using a HAL scale. Arm/hand exertion was also rated by the assemblers themselves using a Borg scale. In total, 66 sub-cycles were assessed and assigned to three exposure categories: A) below ACGIH action limit (AL) (green); B) between AL and TLV (yellow); and C) above TLV (red). The median wrist velocity and the 90th percentile of forearm muscular load obtained from the objective measurements corresponding to the sub-cycles were calculated and assigned to two exposure categories: A) below or C) above the proposed action level. Results. The agreement between ACGIH TLV for hand activity and the proposed action level for wrist velocity was 87%. Conclusions. The proposed action level for wrist velocity is highly consistent with the TLV. Additional studies are needed to confirm the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Prediction of human error probability in helicopter to ship transfer operation under an evidential reasoning extended CREAM approach. Comparison of postural assessment and awareness in individuals receiving posture training using the digital AI posture assessment and correction system. Neuro-fuzzy prediction model of occupational injuries in mining. The impact of digital leadership on safety performance - a moderated mediation model. Air rage from the sharp end: cabin crew perspectives on disruptive passenger behaviour in Europe and its impact on occupational safety and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1