前列腺癌患者接受[177Lu]Lu-PSMA靶向放射性药物治疗的剂量测定:系统回顾与元分析比较。

Zachary Ells, Tristan R Grogan, Johannes Czernin, Magnus Dahlbom, Jeremie Calais
{"title":"前列腺癌患者接受[177Lu]Lu-PSMA靶向放射性药物治疗的剂量测定:系统回顾与元分析比较。","authors":"Zachary Ells, Tristan R Grogan, Johannes Czernin, Magnus Dahlbom, Jeremie Calais","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel theranostic approaches using radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have emerged for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The physical properties and commercial availability of <sup>177</sup>Lu make it one of the most used radionuclides for radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). In this literature review, we aimed at comparing the dosimetry of the most used [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT compounds. <b>Methods:</b> This was a systematic review and metaanalysis of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT (617, I&T, and J591) dosimetry in patients with prostate cancer. Absorbed doses in Gy/GBq for each organ at risk (kidney, parotid and submandibular glands, bone marrow, liver, and lacrimal glands) and for tumor lesions (bone and nonbone lesions) were extracted from included articles. These were used to estimate the pooled average absorbed dose of each agent in Gy/GBq and in Gy/cycle, normalized to the injected activity (per cycle) used in the VISION (7.4 GBq), SPLASH (6.8 GBq), and PROSTACT trials (5.8 GBq). <b>Results:</b> Twenty-nine published articles comprising 535 patients were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled doses (weighted average across studies) of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T were 4.04 Gy/GBq (17 studies, 297 patients) and 4.70 Gy/GBq (10 studies, 153 patients) for the kidney (<i>P</i> = 0.10), 5.85 Gy/GBq (14 studies, 216 patients) and 2.62 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 86 patients) for the parotids (<i>P</i> < 0.01), 5.15 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 81 patients) and 4.35 Gy/GBq (1 study, 18 patients) for the submandibular glands (<i>P</i> = 0.56), 11.03 Gy/GBq (6 studies, 121 patients) and 19.23 Gy/GBq (3 studies, 53 patients) for the lacrimal glands (<i>P</i> = 0.20), 0.24 Gy/GBq (12 studies, 183 patients) and 0.19 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 68 patients) for the bone marrow (<i>P</i> = 0.31), and 1.11 Gy/GBq (9 studies, 154 patients) and 0.56 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 56 patients) for the liver (<i>P</i> = 0.05), respectively. Average tumor doses tended to be higher for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 than for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in soft tissue tumor lesions (4.19 vs. 2.94 Gy/GBq; <i>P</i> = 0.26). Dosimetry data of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-J591 were limited to one published study of 35 patients with reported absorbed doses of 1.41, 0.32, and 2.10 Gy/GBq to the kidney, bone marrow, and liver, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this metaanalysis, there was no significant difference in absorbed dose between [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. There was a possible trend toward a higher kidney dose with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and a higher tumor lesion dose with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. It remains unknown whether this finding has any clinical impact. The dosimetry methodologies were strikingly heterogeneous among studies, emphasizing the need for standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetry of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Ells, Tristan R Grogan, Johannes Czernin, Magnus Dahlbom, Jeremie Calais\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.267452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Novel theranostic approaches using radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have emerged for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The physical properties and commercial availability of <sup>177</sup>Lu make it one of the most used radionuclides for radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). In this literature review, we aimed at comparing the dosimetry of the most used [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT compounds. <b>Methods:</b> This was a systematic review and metaanalysis of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT (617, I&T, and J591) dosimetry in patients with prostate cancer. Absorbed doses in Gy/GBq for each organ at risk (kidney, parotid and submandibular glands, bone marrow, liver, and lacrimal glands) and for tumor lesions (bone and nonbone lesions) were extracted from included articles. These were used to estimate the pooled average absorbed dose of each agent in Gy/GBq and in Gy/cycle, normalized to the injected activity (per cycle) used in the VISION (7.4 GBq), SPLASH (6.8 GBq), and PROSTACT trials (5.8 GBq). <b>Results:</b> Twenty-nine published articles comprising 535 patients were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled doses (weighted average across studies) of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T were 4.04 Gy/GBq (17 studies, 297 patients) and 4.70 Gy/GBq (10 studies, 153 patients) for the kidney (<i>P</i> = 0.10), 5.85 Gy/GBq (14 studies, 216 patients) and 2.62 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 86 patients) for the parotids (<i>P</i> < 0.01), 5.15 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 81 patients) and 4.35 Gy/GBq (1 study, 18 patients) for the submandibular glands (<i>P</i> = 0.56), 11.03 Gy/GBq (6 studies, 121 patients) and 19.23 Gy/GBq (3 studies, 53 patients) for the lacrimal glands (<i>P</i> = 0.20), 0.24 Gy/GBq (12 studies, 183 patients) and 0.19 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 68 patients) for the bone marrow (<i>P</i> = 0.31), and 1.11 Gy/GBq (9 studies, 154 patients) and 0.56 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 56 patients) for the liver (<i>P</i> = 0.05), respectively. Average tumor doses tended to be higher for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 than for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in soft tissue tumor lesions (4.19 vs. 2.94 Gy/GBq; <i>P</i> = 0.26). Dosimetry data of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-J591 were limited to one published study of 35 patients with reported absorbed doses of 1.41, 0.32, and 2.10 Gy/GBq to the kidney, bone marrow, and liver, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this metaanalysis, there was no significant difference in absorbed dose between [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. There was a possible trend toward a higher kidney dose with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and a higher tumor lesion dose with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. It remains unknown whether this finding has any clinical impact. The dosimetry methodologies were strikingly heterogeneous among studies, emphasizing the need for standardization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用针对前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)的放射性药物治疗转移性抗性前列腺癌的新疗法已经出现。177Lu 的物理特性和商业可用性使其成为放射性药物治疗(RPT)中最常用的放射性核素之一。在这篇文献综述中,我们旨在比较最常用的[177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT化合物的剂量学。方法:这是对前列腺癌患者的[177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT(617、I&T 和 J591)剂量学进行的系统回顾和荟萃分析。从纳入的文章中提取了各危险器官(肾脏、腮腺和颌下腺、骨髓、肝脏和泪腺)和肿瘤病灶(骨和非骨病灶)的吸收剂量,单位为 Gy/GBq。这些数据被用来估算每种药物的总平均吸收剂量(单位为Gy/GBq和Gy/周期),并与VISION(7.4 GBq)、SPLASH(6.8 GBq)和PROSTACT试验(5.8 GBq)中使用的注射活性(每周期)进行归一化。结果:荟萃分析纳入了 29 篇已发表的文章,共涉及 535 名患者。肾脏[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617和[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T的总剂量(各研究的加权平均值)分别为4.04 Gy/GBq(17项研究,297名患者)和4.70 Gy/GBq(10项研究,153名患者)(P = 0.10),腮腺分别为 5.85 Gy/GBq(14 项研究,216 名患者)和 2.62 Gy/GBq(5 项研究,86 名患者)(P < 0.01),5.15 Gy/GBq(5 项研究,81 名患者)和 4.35Gy/GBq(1 项研究,18 名患者)(P = 0.56),泪腺 11.03 Gy/GBq(6 项研究,121 名患者)和 19.23 Gy/GBq(3 项研究,53 名患者)(P = 0.20),腮腺 0.骨髓分别为 24 Gy/GBq(12 项研究,183 名患者)和 0.19 Gy/GBq(4 项研究,68 名患者)(P = 0.31),肝脏分别为 1.11 Gy/GBq(9 项研究,154 名患者)和 0.56 Gy/GBq(4 项研究,56 名患者)(P = 0.05)。在软组织肿瘤病变中,[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617的平均肿瘤剂量往往高于[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T(4.19 vs. 2.94 Gy/GBq;P = 0.26)。[177Lu]Lu-J591的剂量测定数据仅限于一项已发表的35名患者的研究,报告称肾脏、骨髓和肝脏的吸收剂量分别为1.41、0.32和2.10 Gy/GBq。结论在这项荟萃分析中,[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T 和 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 的吸收剂量没有明显差异。可能的趋势是[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T的肾脏剂量较高,而[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617的肿瘤病灶剂量较高。这一发现是否会产生任何临床影响仍是未知数。不同研究的剂量测定方法存在显著差异,这强调了标准化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Novel theranostic approaches using radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have emerged for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The physical properties and commercial availability of 177Lu make it one of the most used radionuclides for radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). In this literature review, we aimed at comparing the dosimetry of the most used [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT compounds. Methods: This was a systematic review and metaanalysis of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT (617, I&T, and J591) dosimetry in patients with prostate cancer. Absorbed doses in Gy/GBq for each organ at risk (kidney, parotid and submandibular glands, bone marrow, liver, and lacrimal glands) and for tumor lesions (bone and nonbone lesions) were extracted from included articles. These were used to estimate the pooled average absorbed dose of each agent in Gy/GBq and in Gy/cycle, normalized to the injected activity (per cycle) used in the VISION (7.4 GBq), SPLASH (6.8 GBq), and PROSTACT trials (5.8 GBq). Results: Twenty-nine published articles comprising 535 patients were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled doses (weighted average across studies) of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T were 4.04 Gy/GBq (17 studies, 297 patients) and 4.70 Gy/GBq (10 studies, 153 patients) for the kidney (P = 0.10), 5.85 Gy/GBq (14 studies, 216 patients) and 2.62 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 86 patients) for the parotids (P < 0.01), 5.15 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 81 patients) and 4.35 Gy/GBq (1 study, 18 patients) for the submandibular glands (P = 0.56), 11.03 Gy/GBq (6 studies, 121 patients) and 19.23 Gy/GBq (3 studies, 53 patients) for the lacrimal glands (P = 0.20), 0.24 Gy/GBq (12 studies, 183 patients) and 0.19 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 68 patients) for the bone marrow (P = 0.31), and 1.11 Gy/GBq (9 studies, 154 patients) and 0.56 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 56 patients) for the liver (P = 0.05), respectively. Average tumor doses tended to be higher for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 than for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in soft tissue tumor lesions (4.19 vs. 2.94 Gy/GBq; P = 0.26). Dosimetry data of [177Lu]Lu-J591 were limited to one published study of 35 patients with reported absorbed doses of 1.41, 0.32, and 2.10 Gy/GBq to the kidney, bone marrow, and liver, respectively. Conclusion: In this metaanalysis, there was no significant difference in absorbed dose between [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. There was a possible trend toward a higher kidney dose with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and a higher tumor lesion dose with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. It remains unknown whether this finding has any clinical impact. The dosimetry methodologies were strikingly heterogeneous among studies, emphasizing the need for standardization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Costs to Our Patients. First-in-Human Total-Body PET/CT Imaging Using 89Zr-Labeled MUC5AC Antibody in a Patient with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Is the Clinical Application of CXCR4 Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Aldosteronism Really Happening? Reimagining Biologically Adapted Somatostatin Receptor-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Perspectives Based on Personal Experience and Observations on Recent Trials. Preclinical Evaluation of 226Ac as a Theranostic Agent: Imaging, Dosimetry, and Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1