一阶 $$textrm{ST}$ 的序列计算

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s10992-024-09766-3
Francesco Paoli, Adam Přenosil
{"title":"一阶 $$textrm{ST}$ 的序列计算","authors":"Francesco Paoli, Adam Přenosil","doi":"10.1007/s10992-024-09766-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Strict-Tolerant Logic (<span>\\(\\textrm{ST}\\)</span>) underpins naïve theories of truth and vagueness (respectively including a fully disquotational truth predicate and an unrestricted tolerance principle) without jettisoning any classically valid laws. The classical sequent calculus without Cut is sometimes advocated as an appropriate proof-theoretic presentation of <span>\\(\\textrm{ST}\\)</span>. Unfortunately, there is only a partial correspondence between its derivability relation and the relation of local metainferential <span>\\(\\textrm{ST}\\)</span>-validity – these relations coincide only upon the addition of elimination rules and only within the propositional fragment of the calculus, due to the non-invertibility of the quantifier rules. In this paper, we present two calculi for first-order <span>\\(\\textrm{ST}\\)</span> with an eye to recapturing this correspondence in full. The first calculus is close in spirit to the Epsilon calculus. The other calculus includes rules for the discharge of sequent-assumptions; moreover, it is normalisable and admits interpolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51526,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequent Calculi for First-order $$\\\\textrm{ST}$$\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Paoli, Adam Přenosil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10992-024-09766-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Strict-Tolerant Logic (<span>\\\\(\\\\textrm{ST}\\\\)</span>) underpins naïve theories of truth and vagueness (respectively including a fully disquotational truth predicate and an unrestricted tolerance principle) without jettisoning any classically valid laws. The classical sequent calculus without Cut is sometimes advocated as an appropriate proof-theoretic presentation of <span>\\\\(\\\\textrm{ST}\\\\)</span>. Unfortunately, there is only a partial correspondence between its derivability relation and the relation of local metainferential <span>\\\\(\\\\textrm{ST}\\\\)</span>-validity – these relations coincide only upon the addition of elimination rules and only within the propositional fragment of the calculus, due to the non-invertibility of the quantifier rules. In this paper, we present two calculi for first-order <span>\\\\(\\\\textrm{ST}\\\\)</span> with an eye to recapturing this correspondence in full. The first calculus is close in spirit to the Epsilon calculus. The other calculus includes rules for the discharge of sequent-assumptions; moreover, it is normalisable and admits interpolation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09766-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09766-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严格容忍逻辑(Strict-Tolerant Logic)是关于真假和模糊性的天真理论的基础(分别包括一个完全非语法化的真假谓词和一个无限制的容忍原则),但并不抛弃任何经典有效的法则。经典的无切序列微积分有时被认为是对\(\textrm{ST}\)的适当的证明理论表述。不幸的是,它的可推导性关系和局部元推理的有效性关系之间只有部分对应关系--由于量词规则的不可逆性,这些关系只有在添加消元规则时才重合,而且只在微积分的命题片段中重合。在本文中,我们提出了两个关于一阶 \(\textrm{ST}\)的计算方法,以期完整地重现这种对应关系。第一种计算方法在精神上接近于 Epsilon 计算方法。另一种计算包含了解除顺序假设的规则;此外,它是可归一化的,并允许插值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sequent Calculi for First-order $$\textrm{ST}$$

Strict-Tolerant Logic (\(\textrm{ST}\)) underpins naïve theories of truth and vagueness (respectively including a fully disquotational truth predicate and an unrestricted tolerance principle) without jettisoning any classically valid laws. The classical sequent calculus without Cut is sometimes advocated as an appropriate proof-theoretic presentation of \(\textrm{ST}\). Unfortunately, there is only a partial correspondence between its derivability relation and the relation of local metainferential \(\textrm{ST}\)-validity – these relations coincide only upon the addition of elimination rules and only within the propositional fragment of the calculus, due to the non-invertibility of the quantifier rules. In this paper, we present two calculi for first-order \(\textrm{ST}\) with an eye to recapturing this correspondence in full. The first calculus is close in spirit to the Epsilon calculus. The other calculus includes rules for the discharge of sequent-assumptions; moreover, it is normalisable and admits interpolation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Philosophical Logic aims to provide a forum for work at the crossroads of philosophy and logic, old and new, with contributions ranging from conceptual to technical.  Accordingly, the Journal invites papers in all of the traditional areas of philosophical logic, including but not limited to: various versions of modal, temporal, epistemic, and deontic logic; constructive logics; relevance and other sub-classical logics; many-valued logics; logics of conditionals; quantum logic; decision theory, inductive logic, logics of belief change, and formal epistemology; defeasible and nonmonotonic logics; formal philosophy of language; vagueness; and theories of truth and validity. In addition to publishing papers on philosophical logic in this familiar sense of the term, the Journal also invites papers on extensions of logic to new areas of application, and on the philosophical issues to which these give rise. The Journal places a special emphasis on the applications of philosophical logic in other disciplines, not only in mathematics and the natural sciences but also, for example, in computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, linguistics, jurisprudence, and the social sciences, such as economics, sociology, and political science.
期刊最新文献
Patches, Patchworks, and Epsilon Terms: A Neo-Carnapian Account of Theoretical Terms in Science Fusions in Intuitionistic Mereology Infinity, Choice, and Hume’s Principle Heraclitus-Maximal Worlds Epistemic Logics for Relevant Reasoners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1