公司治理与公司风险承担:来自印度的经验证据

Reshma Kumari Tiwari, Ratish Kumar Jha
{"title":"公司治理与公司风险承担:来自印度的经验证据","authors":"Reshma Kumari Tiwari, Ratish Kumar Jha","doi":"10.1108/ijlma-01-2024-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) on firm risk-taking in India.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The present study is based on a panel data set of 100 non-financial Indian firms randomly selected from the top 500 firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The study uses two market-based measures to capture firm risk-taking – total risk and idiosyncratic risk. Generalised method of moments model is applied to examine the relationship between CG and firm risk-taking. Additionally, the fixed-effects model is applied to check the robustness of the results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study reveals a significant negative impact of CG index, CEO duality, multiple directorships, promoter ownership and institutional ownership on firm risk-taking. Whereas board size, board independence, board gender diversity and the number of board meetings do not significantly impact firm risk-taking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive view of how various CG attributes shape firm risk-taking in India. It examines eight CG variables: board size, board independence, board gender diversity, CEO duality, multiple directorships, number of board meetings, promoter ownership and institutional ownership. Furthermore, the study incorporates idiosyncratic risk as an additional measure of firm risk-taking, largely overlooked in the Indian context. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the impact of CG index on firm risk-taking in India.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Management","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate governance and firm risk-taking: empirical evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"Reshma Kumari Tiwari, Ratish Kumar Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlma-01-2024-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) on firm risk-taking in India.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The present study is based on a panel data set of 100 non-financial Indian firms randomly selected from the top 500 firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The study uses two market-based measures to capture firm risk-taking – total risk and idiosyncratic risk. Generalised method of moments model is applied to examine the relationship between CG and firm risk-taking. Additionally, the fixed-effects model is applied to check the robustness of the results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The study reveals a significant negative impact of CG index, CEO duality, multiple directorships, promoter ownership and institutional ownership on firm risk-taking. Whereas board size, board independence, board gender diversity and the number of board meetings do not significantly impact firm risk-taking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive view of how various CG attributes shape firm risk-taking in India. It examines eight CG variables: board size, board independence, board gender diversity, CEO duality, multiple directorships, number of board meetings, promoter ownership and institutional ownership. Furthermore, the study incorporates idiosyncratic risk as an additional measure of firm risk-taking, largely overlooked in the Indian context. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the impact of CG index on firm risk-taking in India.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Management\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-01-2024-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-01-2024-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于从孟买证券交易所前 500 家上市公司中随机抽取的 100 家非金融类印度公司的面板数据集。研究采用了两种基于市场的衡量标准来捕捉公司的风险承担情况--总风险和特异风险。研究采用广义矩量法模型来检验企业管治与企业风险承担之间的关系。研究结果表明,企业管治指数、首席执行官双重性、多重董事职位、发起人所有权和机构所有权对企业风险承担有显著的负面影响。而董事会规模、董事会独立性、董事会性别多样性和董事会会议次数对公司风险承担没有显著影响。研究考察了八个企业管治变量:董事会规模、董事会独立性、董事会性别多样性、首席执行官双重性、多重董事身份、董事会会议次数、发起人所有权和机构所有权。此外,研究还纳入了特异性风险,作为衡量公司风险承担的额外指标,这在印度的情况下大多被忽视。此外,据作者所知,这是第一项研究企业管治指数对印度企业承担风险的影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate governance and firm risk-taking: empirical evidence from India

Purpose

This study aims to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) on firm risk-taking in India.

Design/methodology/approach

The present study is based on a panel data set of 100 non-financial Indian firms randomly selected from the top 500 firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The study uses two market-based measures to capture firm risk-taking – total risk and idiosyncratic risk. Generalised method of moments model is applied to examine the relationship between CG and firm risk-taking. Additionally, the fixed-effects model is applied to check the robustness of the results.

Findings

The study reveals a significant negative impact of CG index, CEO duality, multiple directorships, promoter ownership and institutional ownership on firm risk-taking. Whereas board size, board independence, board gender diversity and the number of board meetings do not significantly impact firm risk-taking.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive view of how various CG attributes shape firm risk-taking in India. It examines eight CG variables: board size, board independence, board gender diversity, CEO duality, multiple directorships, number of board meetings, promoter ownership and institutional ownership. Furthermore, the study incorporates idiosyncratic risk as an additional measure of firm risk-taking, largely overlooked in the Indian context. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the impact of CG index on firm risk-taking in India.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Management is a leading journal addressing all aspects of regulation and law as they impact on organisational development, operations and leadership. Organisations and their leaders operate in an increasingly complex world of emerging regulation across national and international boundaries. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to acknowledge the dynamics of that environment and provide a platform for articles and contributions to stimulate scholarly debate in the development of law and practice. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to present the latest research on policy, practice and theoretical perspectives and their impact on the development and leadership of organisations. Contributions of a multi-disciplinary nature are welcome. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: -Employment and industrial law- Corporate governance and social responsibility- Intellectual property- Corporate law and finance- Insolvency- Commercial law and consumer protection- Environmental law- Taxation- Competition law- Regulatory theory
期刊最新文献
Foreign direct investment and the protection of garment workers' rights in Bangladesh From revelation to modern Islamic finance: Islamic commercial law in the UAE as a case study Three decades of WTO dispute settlement: insights from bibliometric literature review and future research agenda Inflated energy prices and capital structure: firm level evidence from Indian manufacturing sector Corporate carbon emissions, science-based targets initiatives and firm performance: evidence from India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1