Jiuhui Li, Zhengfang Wu, Wenxi Lu, Hongshi He, Yaqian He
{"title":"利用无色卡尔曼平滑器识别水力传导性和地下水污染源","authors":"Jiuhui Li, Zhengfang Wu, Wenxi Lu, Hongshi He, Yaqian He","doi":"10.1007/s00477-024-02761-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The identification of groundwater contamination sources (IGCSs) is an important requirement for the remediation and treatment of groundwater contamination. The data assimilation methods such as ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and ensemble smoother (ES) have been applied to IGCSs in recent years and obtained good identification results. The unscented kalman filter (UKF) is also a data assimilation method with the potential to simultaneously identify hydraulic conductivity and GCSs. However, when UKF is applied to identify hydraulic conductivity and GCSs, it is necessary to use the observed data at different times separately, which increases the complexity of the update process and this may result in low identification accuracy. ES is a variant of EnKF that updates the system parameters with all observed data in all time periods, which makes ES faster and easier to implement than EnKF. Therefore, inspired by the ES, an unscented kalman smoother (UKS) based on UKF was proposed for simultaneously identifying the hydraulic conductivity and GCSs in this study. The UKS can use the data observed in all time periods simultaneously, while it is also simpler to operate and the calculation speed is faster. Present studies have shown that ES can solve IGCS problems. Thus, ES was also applied to identify the hydraulic conductivity and GCSs in this study, and its identification performance was compared with UKS. In contrast to previous applications of ES to IGCSs, both UKS and ES were set up with stop iteration conditions instead of only performing one update process, and thus both methods applied multiple update processes. The results showed that compared with ES, the identification results obtained by UKS were characterized by greater stability, higher accuracy, and the iterative process required less iteration process and computational time.</p>","PeriodicalId":21987,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of hydraulic conductivity and groundwater contamination sources with an Unscented Kalman Smoother\",\"authors\":\"Jiuhui Li, Zhengfang Wu, Wenxi Lu, Hongshi He, Yaqian He\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00477-024-02761-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The identification of groundwater contamination sources (IGCSs) is an important requirement for the remediation and treatment of groundwater contamination. The data assimilation methods such as ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and ensemble smoother (ES) have been applied to IGCSs in recent years and obtained good identification results. The unscented kalman filter (UKF) is also a data assimilation method with the potential to simultaneously identify hydraulic conductivity and GCSs. However, when UKF is applied to identify hydraulic conductivity and GCSs, it is necessary to use the observed data at different times separately, which increases the complexity of the update process and this may result in low identification accuracy. ES is a variant of EnKF that updates the system parameters with all observed data in all time periods, which makes ES faster and easier to implement than EnKF. Therefore, inspired by the ES, an unscented kalman smoother (UKS) based on UKF was proposed for simultaneously identifying the hydraulic conductivity and GCSs in this study. The UKS can use the data observed in all time periods simultaneously, while it is also simpler to operate and the calculation speed is faster. Present studies have shown that ES can solve IGCS problems. Thus, ES was also applied to identify the hydraulic conductivity and GCSs in this study, and its identification performance was compared with UKS. In contrast to previous applications of ES to IGCSs, both UKS and ES were set up with stop iteration conditions instead of only performing one update process, and thus both methods applied multiple update processes. The results showed that compared with ES, the identification results obtained by UKS were characterized by greater stability, higher accuracy, and the iterative process required less iteration process and computational time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02761-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02761-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
地下水污染源(IGCS)的识别是地下水污染修复和治理的重要条件。近年来,集合卡尔曼滤波器(EnKF)和集合平滑器(ES)等数据同化方法已被应用于地下水污染源识别,并取得了良好的识别效果。无特征卡尔曼滤波法(UKF)也是一种数据同化方法,有可能同时识别水力传导性和地质灾害点。然而,UKF 在识别水力传导性和 GCS 时,需要分别使用不同时间的观测数据,这增加了更新过程的复杂性,可能导致识别精度较低。ES 是 EnKF 的一种变体,它使用所有时间段的所有观测数据更新系统参数,这使得 ES 比 EnKF 更快、更容易实现。因此,受 ES 的启发,本研究提出了一种基于 UKF 的无香味卡尔曼平滑器(UKS),用于同时识别水力传导性和 GCS。UKS 可以同时使用所有时间段的观测数据,而且操作更简单,计算速度更快。目前的研究表明,ES 可以解决 IGCS 问题。因此,本研究也将 ES 用于识别水力传导性和 GCS,并将其识别性能与 UKS 进行了比较。与之前将 ES 应用于 IGCS 不同的是,UKS 和 ES 都设置了停止迭代条件,而不是只执行一次更新过程,因此这两种方法都应用了多次更新过程。结果表明,与 ES 相比,UKS 得到的识别结果具有更高的稳定性和准确性,迭代过程所需的迭代过程和计算时间也更少。
Identification of hydraulic conductivity and groundwater contamination sources with an Unscented Kalman Smoother
The identification of groundwater contamination sources (IGCSs) is an important requirement for the remediation and treatment of groundwater contamination. The data assimilation methods such as ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and ensemble smoother (ES) have been applied to IGCSs in recent years and obtained good identification results. The unscented kalman filter (UKF) is also a data assimilation method with the potential to simultaneously identify hydraulic conductivity and GCSs. However, when UKF is applied to identify hydraulic conductivity and GCSs, it is necessary to use the observed data at different times separately, which increases the complexity of the update process and this may result in low identification accuracy. ES is a variant of EnKF that updates the system parameters with all observed data in all time periods, which makes ES faster and easier to implement than EnKF. Therefore, inspired by the ES, an unscented kalman smoother (UKS) based on UKF was proposed for simultaneously identifying the hydraulic conductivity and GCSs in this study. The UKS can use the data observed in all time periods simultaneously, while it is also simpler to operate and the calculation speed is faster. Present studies have shown that ES can solve IGCS problems. Thus, ES was also applied to identify the hydraulic conductivity and GCSs in this study, and its identification performance was compared with UKS. In contrast to previous applications of ES to IGCSs, both UKS and ES were set up with stop iteration conditions instead of only performing one update process, and thus both methods applied multiple update processes. The results showed that compared with ES, the identification results obtained by UKS were characterized by greater stability, higher accuracy, and the iterative process required less iteration process and computational time.
期刊介绍:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA) will publish research papers, reviews and technical notes on stochastic and probabilistic approaches to environmental sciences and engineering, including interactions of earth and atmospheric environments with people and ecosystems. The basic idea is to bring together research papers on stochastic modelling in various fields of environmental sciences and to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas, for communicating on issues that cut across disciplinary barriers, and for the dissemination of stochastic techniques used in different fields to the community of interested researchers. Original contributions will be considered dealing with modelling (theoretical and computational), measurements and instrumentation in one or more of the following topical areas:
- Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of natural processes.
- Enviroinformatics.
- Environmental risk assessment, reliability analysis and decision making.
- Surface and subsurface hydrology and hydraulics.
- Multiphase porous media domains and contaminant transport modelling.
- Hazardous waste site characterization.
- Stochastic turbulence and random hydrodynamic fields.
- Chaotic and fractal systems.
- Random waves and seafloor morphology.
- Stochastic atmospheric and climate processes.
- Air pollution and quality assessment research.
- Modern geostatistics.
- Mechanisms of pollutant formation, emission, exposure and absorption.
- Physical, chemical and biological analysis of human exposure from single and multiple media and routes; control and protection.
- Bioinformatics.
- Probabilistic methods in ecology and population biology.
- Epidemiological investigations.
- Models using stochastic differential equations stochastic or partial differential equations.
- Hazardous waste site characterization.