用于多模态情感分析的多模态 PEAR 思维推理链

IF 5.2 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1145/3672398
Yan Li, Xiangyuan Lan, Haifeng Chen, Ke Lu, Dongmei Jiang
{"title":"用于多模态情感分析的多模态 PEAR 思维推理链","authors":"Yan Li, Xiangyuan Lan, Haifeng Chen, Ke Lu, Dongmei Jiang","doi":"10.1145/3672398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to predict sentiments from multimodal signals such as audio, video, and text. Existing methods often rely on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) to extract semantic information from textual data, <b>lacking an in-depth understanding of the logical relationships within the text modality</b>. This paper introduces the Multimodal PEAR Chain-of-Thought (MM-PEAR-CoT) reasoning for multimodal sentiment analysis. Inspired by the human thought process when solving complex problems, the PEAR (Preliminaries, quEstion, Answer, Reason) chain-of-thought prompt is first proposed to induce Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text-based reasoning processes and zero-shot sentiment prediction results. However, <b>text-based chain-of-thought reasoning is not always reliable and might contain irrational steps due to the hallucinations of large language models</b>. To address this, we further design the Cross-Modal Filtering and Fusion (CMFF) module. The filtering submodule utilizes audio and visual modalities to suppress irrational steps in the chain of thought, while the fusion submodule integrates high-level reasoning information and cross-modal complementary information in the process of semantic representation learning. Experimental results on two multimodal sentiment analysis benchmark datasets show that high-level reasoning information can help learn discriminative text representation, and cross-modal complementary information can avoid misleading by unreasonable steps in the chain of thought. MM-PEAR-CoT achieves the best results on both datasets, with improvements of 2.2% and 1.7% in binary classification accuracy on the CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI datasets, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply chain-of-thought reasoning to multimodal sentiment analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50937,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal PEAR Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yan Li, Xiangyuan Lan, Haifeng Chen, Ke Lu, Dongmei Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3672398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to predict sentiments from multimodal signals such as audio, video, and text. Existing methods often rely on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) to extract semantic information from textual data, <b>lacking an in-depth understanding of the logical relationships within the text modality</b>. This paper introduces the Multimodal PEAR Chain-of-Thought (MM-PEAR-CoT) reasoning for multimodal sentiment analysis. Inspired by the human thought process when solving complex problems, the PEAR (Preliminaries, quEstion, Answer, Reason) chain-of-thought prompt is first proposed to induce Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text-based reasoning processes and zero-shot sentiment prediction results. However, <b>text-based chain-of-thought reasoning is not always reliable and might contain irrational steps due to the hallucinations of large language models</b>. To address this, we further design the Cross-Modal Filtering and Fusion (CMFF) module. The filtering submodule utilizes audio and visual modalities to suppress irrational steps in the chain of thought, while the fusion submodule integrates high-level reasoning information and cross-modal complementary information in the process of semantic representation learning. Experimental results on two multimodal sentiment analysis benchmark datasets show that high-level reasoning information can help learn discriminative text representation, and cross-modal complementary information can avoid misleading by unreasonable steps in the chain of thought. MM-PEAR-CoT achieves the best results on both datasets, with improvements of 2.2% and 1.7% in binary classification accuracy on the CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI datasets, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply chain-of-thought reasoning to multimodal sentiment analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3672398\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3672398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多模态情感分析旨在从音频、视频和文本等多模态信号中预测情感。现有方法通常依赖预训练语言模型(PLM)从文本数据中提取语义信息,缺乏对文本模态内部逻辑关系的深入理解。本文介绍了用于多模态情感分析的多模态 PEAR 思维链(MM-PEAR-CoT)推理。受人类在解决复杂问题时的思维过程启发,首次提出了 PEAR(Preliminaries、quEstion、Answer、Reason)思维链提示,以诱导大型语言模型(LLM)生成基于文本的推理过程和零误差情感预测结果。然而,基于文本的思维链推理并不总是可靠的,可能会由于大型语言模型的幻觉而包含不合理的步骤。为此,我们进一步设计了跨模态过滤和融合(CMFF)模块。过滤子模块利用音频和视觉模态抑制思维链中的不合理步骤,而融合子模块则在语义表征学习过程中整合高级推理信息和跨模态互补信息。在两个多模态情感分析基准数据集上的实验结果表明,高层推理信息有助于学习辨别性文本表征,而跨模态互补信息可以避免思维链中不合理步骤的误导。MM-PEAR-CoT 在这两个数据集上都取得了最佳结果,在 CMU-MOSI 和 CMU-MOSEI 数据集上的二元分类准确率分别提高了 2.2% 和 1.7%。据我们所知,这是第一项将思维链推理应用于多模态情感分析的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multimodal PEAR Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to predict sentiments from multimodal signals such as audio, video, and text. Existing methods often rely on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) to extract semantic information from textual data, lacking an in-depth understanding of the logical relationships within the text modality. This paper introduces the Multimodal PEAR Chain-of-Thought (MM-PEAR-CoT) reasoning for multimodal sentiment analysis. Inspired by the human thought process when solving complex problems, the PEAR (Preliminaries, quEstion, Answer, Reason) chain-of-thought prompt is first proposed to induce Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text-based reasoning processes and zero-shot sentiment prediction results. However, text-based chain-of-thought reasoning is not always reliable and might contain irrational steps due to the hallucinations of large language models. To address this, we further design the Cross-Modal Filtering and Fusion (CMFF) module. The filtering submodule utilizes audio and visual modalities to suppress irrational steps in the chain of thought, while the fusion submodule integrates high-level reasoning information and cross-modal complementary information in the process of semantic representation learning. Experimental results on two multimodal sentiment analysis benchmark datasets show that high-level reasoning information can help learn discriminative text representation, and cross-modal complementary information can avoid misleading by unreasonable steps in the chain of thought. MM-PEAR-CoT achieves the best results on both datasets, with improvements of 2.2% and 1.7% in binary classification accuracy on the CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI datasets, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply chain-of-thought reasoning to multimodal sentiment analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
285
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications is the flagship publication of the ACM Special Interest Group in Multimedia (SIGMM). It is soliciting paper submissions on all aspects of multimedia. Papers on single media (for instance, audio, video, animation) and their processing are also welcome. TOMM is a peer-reviewed, archival journal, available in both print form and digital form. The Journal is published quarterly; with roughly 7 23-page articles in each issue. In addition, all Special Issues are published online-only to ensure a timely publication. The transactions consists primarily of research papers. This is an archival journal and it is intended that the papers will have lasting importance and value over time. In general, papers whose primary focus is on particular multimedia products or the current state of the industry will not be included.
期刊最新文献
TA-Detector: A GNN-based Anomaly Detector via Trust Relationship KF-VTON: Keypoints-Driven Flow Based Virtual Try-On Network Unified View Empirical Study for Large Pretrained Model on Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning Multimodal Fusion for Talking Face Generation Utilizing Speech-related Facial Action Units Compressed Point Cloud Quality Index by Combining Global Appearance and Local Details
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1