{"title":"什么是崇拜?Caroli regis contra synodum 作品(约 790-4 年)空白处的意义之争","authors":"Huw Foden","doi":"10.1111/emed.12721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contradictions over the meaning of adoration (<i>adoratio</i>) in Theodulf of Orléans’ <i>Opus Caroli regis contra synodum</i> have been used to minimize the role of mistranslation in the late eighth-century Greek–Latin dispute over images. This study, however, scrutinizes the contested meaning of adoration in the original manuscript to expose tensions among Charlemagne’s key theological advisers. These fissures reveal the text’s collaborative production and purpose: neither the fully independent work of a lone scholar, nor intended for publication to an extensive audience, but a project to stimulate debate amidst the king’s counsellors.</p>","PeriodicalId":44508,"journal":{"name":"Early Medieval Europe","volume":"32 3","pages":"387-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emed.12721","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is adoration? Contesting meaning in the margins of the Opus Caroli regis contra synodum (c.790–4)\",\"authors\":\"Huw Foden\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emed.12721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Contradictions over the meaning of adoration (<i>adoratio</i>) in Theodulf of Orléans’ <i>Opus Caroli regis contra synodum</i> have been used to minimize the role of mistranslation in the late eighth-century Greek–Latin dispute over images. This study, however, scrutinizes the contested meaning of adoration in the original manuscript to expose tensions among Charlemagne’s key theological advisers. These fissures reveal the text’s collaborative production and purpose: neither the fully independent work of a lone scholar, nor intended for publication to an extensive audience, but a project to stimulate debate amidst the king’s counsellors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"387-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emed.12721\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Medieval Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
奥尔良的西奥多弗在《Opus Caroli regis contra synodum》中对崇拜(adoratio)含义的矛盾被用来最小化误译在八世纪晚期希腊语-拉丁语图像争端中的作用。然而,本研究仔细研究了原稿中 "崇拜 "这一有争议的含义,揭示了查理曼大帝的主要神学顾问之间的紧张关系。这些裂痕揭示了该文本的合作制作和目的:既不是一个学者完全独立的作品,也不是为了向广大读者出版,而是一个在国王的顾问中引发争论的项目。
What is adoration? Contesting meaning in the margins of the Opus Caroli regis contra synodum (c.790–4)
Contradictions over the meaning of adoration (adoratio) in Theodulf of Orléans’ Opus Caroli regis contra synodum have been used to minimize the role of mistranslation in the late eighth-century Greek–Latin dispute over images. This study, however, scrutinizes the contested meaning of adoration in the original manuscript to expose tensions among Charlemagne’s key theological advisers. These fissures reveal the text’s collaborative production and purpose: neither the fully independent work of a lone scholar, nor intended for publication to an extensive audience, but a project to stimulate debate amidst the king’s counsellors.
期刊介绍:
Early Medieval Europe provides an indispensable source of information and debate on the history of Europe from the later Roman Empire to the eleventh century. The journal is a thoroughly interdisciplinary forum, encouraging the discussion of archaeology, numismatics, palaeography, diplomatic, literature, onomastics, art history, linguistics and epigraphy, as well as more traditional historical approaches. It covers Europe in its entirety, including material on Iceland, Ireland, the British Isles, Scandinavia and Continental Europe (both west and east).