{"title":"印度拉达克喜马拉雅全新世沉积的构造-气候综合控制:湖泊沉积物磁感应强度(AMS)各向异性提供的线索","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jop.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) data from a ∼27.8 m thick soft sedimentary mud sequence (∼10.5–3.25 k yrs) from the Spituk Palaeolake Sequence (SPSS) of Holocene age, located in the northern bank of the Indus River in the Leh-Ladakh Himalaya, show effects of tectonic versus climate dynamics responsible for the Himalayan sedimentation. The sedimentary sequence, consisting of alternating of aeolian sand and glacio-fluvial mud flow deposits, has been subdivided into an older Last Glacier Phase I (LGP 1) and a younger Last Glacier Phase II (LGP 2), where the termination of each phase is marked by the occurrence of gravel beds of thickness ≤1 m, which were deposited due to glacial melting. The present AMS data along with previously published information on sedimentology confirm that the mudflow deposits of the LGP 1 and LGP 2 phases were deposited in a lacustrine environment under glacio-fluvial conditions. However, a weak fluvial flow towards NW and NE could have existed for the LGP 1 and LGP 2, respectively. The glacial beds terminating LGP 1 and LGP 2 appear to have formed by climatic warming and tectonic activity, respectively. Hence, the Holocene Himalayan sedimentation was influenced by both climatic and tectonic activities. However, the thickness of the gravel bed (∼0.8 m) terminating LGP 2 occupies only ∼ 2.8 vol % of the total studied thickness ∼28 m, of the SPSS in the present study, which indicated a lesser control of tectonism in the growth of the Himalaya in and around the study area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palaeogeography","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 738-753"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A combined tectono-climatic control on Holocene sedimentation in Ladakh Himalaya, India: Clues from Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) of lake sediments\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jop.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) data from a ∼27.8 m thick soft sedimentary mud sequence (∼10.5–3.25 k yrs) from the Spituk Palaeolake Sequence (SPSS) of Holocene age, located in the northern bank of the Indus River in the Leh-Ladakh Himalaya, show effects of tectonic versus climate dynamics responsible for the Himalayan sedimentation. The sedimentary sequence, consisting of alternating of aeolian sand and glacio-fluvial mud flow deposits, has been subdivided into an older Last Glacier Phase I (LGP 1) and a younger Last Glacier Phase II (LGP 2), where the termination of each phase is marked by the occurrence of gravel beds of thickness ≤1 m, which were deposited due to glacial melting. The present AMS data along with previously published information on sedimentology confirm that the mudflow deposits of the LGP 1 and LGP 2 phases were deposited in a lacustrine environment under glacio-fluvial conditions. However, a weak fluvial flow towards NW and NE could have existed for the LGP 1 and LGP 2, respectively. The glacial beds terminating LGP 1 and LGP 2 appear to have formed by climatic warming and tectonic activity, respectively. Hence, the Holocene Himalayan sedimentation was influenced by both climatic and tectonic activities. However, the thickness of the gravel bed (∼0.8 m) terminating LGP 2 occupies only ∼ 2.8 vol % of the total studied thickness ∼28 m, of the SPSS in the present study, which indicated a lesser control of tectonism in the growth of the Himalaya in and around the study area.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palaeogeography\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 738-753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palaeogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383624000476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palaeogeography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383624000476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A combined tectono-climatic control on Holocene sedimentation in Ladakh Himalaya, India: Clues from Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) of lake sediments
Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) data from a ∼27.8 m thick soft sedimentary mud sequence (∼10.5–3.25 k yrs) from the Spituk Palaeolake Sequence (SPSS) of Holocene age, located in the northern bank of the Indus River in the Leh-Ladakh Himalaya, show effects of tectonic versus climate dynamics responsible for the Himalayan sedimentation. The sedimentary sequence, consisting of alternating of aeolian sand and glacio-fluvial mud flow deposits, has been subdivided into an older Last Glacier Phase I (LGP 1) and a younger Last Glacier Phase II (LGP 2), where the termination of each phase is marked by the occurrence of gravel beds of thickness ≤1 m, which were deposited due to glacial melting. The present AMS data along with previously published information on sedimentology confirm that the mudflow deposits of the LGP 1 and LGP 2 phases were deposited in a lacustrine environment under glacio-fluvial conditions. However, a weak fluvial flow towards NW and NE could have existed for the LGP 1 and LGP 2, respectively. The glacial beds terminating LGP 1 and LGP 2 appear to have formed by climatic warming and tectonic activity, respectively. Hence, the Holocene Himalayan sedimentation was influenced by both climatic and tectonic activities. However, the thickness of the gravel bed (∼0.8 m) terminating LGP 2 occupies only ∼ 2.8 vol % of the total studied thickness ∼28 m, of the SPSS in the present study, which indicated a lesser control of tectonism in the growth of the Himalaya in and around the study area.