关系属性:定义、还原和状态

IF 0.6 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Ratio Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1111/rati.12414
Bo R. Meinertsen
{"title":"关系属性:定义、还原和状态","authors":"Bo R. Meinertsen","doi":"10.1111/rati.12414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper defines relational properties and argues for their reducibility in a, broadly speaking, Armstrongian framework of state of affairs ontology and truthmaking. While Armstrong's own characterisation and reduction of them arguably is the best one available in the literature of this framework, it suffers from two main problems. As will be shown, it neither defines relational properties very clearly (if at all), nor provides an adequate conception of their reduction. This paper attempts to remedy this situation in four steps. First, it introduces relational properties and why they matter in metaphysics in general. Second, by briefly comparing and contrasting them with extrinsic properties, and by briefly mapping them onto a tripartite division of relations, the particular kinds of relevant relational properties are identified. Third, it classifies relational properties and thereby makes possible an apt definition of them. Finally, using the notion of truthmaking, it outlines a more satisfactory case for their reduction.","PeriodicalId":46553,"journal":{"name":"Ratio","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational properties: Definition, reduction, and states of affairs\",\"authors\":\"Bo R. Meinertsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rati.12414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper defines relational properties and argues for their reducibility in a, broadly speaking, Armstrongian framework of state of affairs ontology and truthmaking. While Armstrong's own characterisation and reduction of them arguably is the best one available in the literature of this framework, it suffers from two main problems. As will be shown, it neither defines relational properties very clearly (if at all), nor provides an adequate conception of their reduction. This paper attempts to remedy this situation in four steps. First, it introduces relational properties and why they matter in metaphysics in general. Second, by briefly comparing and contrasting them with extrinsic properties, and by briefly mapping them onto a tripartite division of relations, the particular kinds of relevant relational properties are identified. Third, it classifies relational properties and thereby makes possible an apt definition of them. Finally, using the notion of truthmaking, it outlines a more satisfactory case for their reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ratio\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ratio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文定义了关系属性,并论证了它们在广义上的阿姆斯特朗事态本体论和求真框架中的可还原性。虽然阿姆斯特朗本人对关系属性的描述和还原可以说是该框架文献中最好的,但它存在两个主要问题。正如本文将要论证的,它既没有非常清晰地定义关系属性(如果有的话),也没有提供对其还原的适当概念。本文试图通过四个步骤来弥补这一缺陷。首先,本文介绍了关系属性及其在形而上学中的重要性。其次,通过将它们与外在属性进行简单的比较和对比,并将它们简单地映射到关系的三方划分中,确定了相关关系属性的特定种类。第三,对关系属性进行分类,从而给它们下一个恰当的定义。最后,通过使用 "建立真理 "的概念,概述了一个更令人满意的还原案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relational properties: Definition, reduction, and states of affairs
This paper defines relational properties and argues for their reducibility in a, broadly speaking, Armstrongian framework of state of affairs ontology and truthmaking. While Armstrong's own characterisation and reduction of them arguably is the best one available in the literature of this framework, it suffers from two main problems. As will be shown, it neither defines relational properties very clearly (if at all), nor provides an adequate conception of their reduction. This paper attempts to remedy this situation in four steps. First, it introduces relational properties and why they matter in metaphysics in general. Second, by briefly comparing and contrasting them with extrinsic properties, and by briefly mapping them onto a tripartite division of relations, the particular kinds of relevant relational properties are identified. Third, it classifies relational properties and thereby makes possible an apt definition of them. Finally, using the notion of truthmaking, it outlines a more satisfactory case for their reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ratio
Ratio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Ratio publishes work of a high quality on a wide variety of topics. It encourages articles which meet the highest standards of philosophical expertise, while at the same time remaining accessible to readers from a broad range of philosophical disciplines. The journal"s main emphasis is on analytic philosophy, but it also includes work from other traditions.
期刊最新文献
Intrinsic Properties and the Problem of “Other Things” Rejecting norms of standing for private blame The property of goal‐directedness: Lessons from the dispositions debate The limits of compromise Prime matter emergentism: Unity without reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1