利用 NetFlow 数据对反射攻击进行实证研究

IF 3.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Cybersecurity Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1186/s42400-023-00203-7
Edward Chuah, Neeraj Suri
{"title":"利用 NetFlow 数据对反射攻击进行实证研究","authors":"Edward Chuah, Neeraj Suri","doi":"10.1186/s42400-023-00203-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reflection attacks are one of the most intimidating threats organizations face. A reflection attack is a special type of distributed denial-of-service attack that amplifies the amount of malicious traffic by using reflectors and hides the identity of the attacker. Reflection attacks are known to be one of the most common causes of service disruption in large networks. Large networks perform extensive logging of NetFlow data, and parsing this data is an advocated basis for identifying network attacks. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of NetFlow data containing 1.7 billion NetFlow records and identified reflection attacks on the network time protocol (NTP) and NetBIOS servers. We set up three regression models including the Ridge, Elastic Net and LASSO. To the best of our knowledge, there is no work that studied different regression models to understand patterns of reflection attacks in a large network. In this paper, we (a) propose an approach for identifying correlations of reflection attacks, and (b) evaluate the three regression models on real NetFlow data. Our results show that (a) reflection attacks on the NTP servers are not correlated, (b) reflection attacks on the NetBIOS servers are not correlated, (c) the traffic generated by those reflection attacks did not overwhelm the NTP and NetBIOS servers, and (d) the dwell times of reflection attacks on the NTP and NetBIOS servers are too small for predicting reflection attacks on these servers. Our work on reflection attacks identification highlights recommendations that could facilitate better handling of reflection attacks in large networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":36402,"journal":{"name":"Cybersecurity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical study of reflection attacks using NetFlow data\",\"authors\":\"Edward Chuah, Neeraj Suri\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42400-023-00203-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reflection attacks are one of the most intimidating threats organizations face. A reflection attack is a special type of distributed denial-of-service attack that amplifies the amount of malicious traffic by using reflectors and hides the identity of the attacker. Reflection attacks are known to be one of the most common causes of service disruption in large networks. Large networks perform extensive logging of NetFlow data, and parsing this data is an advocated basis for identifying network attacks. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of NetFlow data containing 1.7 billion NetFlow records and identified reflection attacks on the network time protocol (NTP) and NetBIOS servers. We set up three regression models including the Ridge, Elastic Net and LASSO. To the best of our knowledge, there is no work that studied different regression models to understand patterns of reflection attacks in a large network. In this paper, we (a) propose an approach for identifying correlations of reflection attacks, and (b) evaluate the three regression models on real NetFlow data. Our results show that (a) reflection attacks on the NTP servers are not correlated, (b) reflection attacks on the NetBIOS servers are not correlated, (c) the traffic generated by those reflection attacks did not overwhelm the NTP and NetBIOS servers, and (d) the dwell times of reflection attacks on the NTP and NetBIOS servers are too small for predicting reflection attacks on these servers. Our work on reflection attacks identification highlights recommendations that could facilitate better handling of reflection attacks in large networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cybersecurity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cybersecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-023-00203-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-023-00203-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反射攻击是企业面临的最可怕的威胁之一。反射攻击是一种特殊类型的分布式拒绝服务攻击,它通过使用反射器来放大恶意流量,并隐藏攻击者的身份。众所周知,反射攻击是造成大型网络服务中断的最常见原因之一。大型网络会记录大量 NetFlow 数据,解析这些数据是识别网络攻击的基础。我们对包含 17 亿条 NetFlow 记录的 NetFlow 数据进行了全面分析,发现了对网络时间协议 (NTP) 和 NetBIOS 服务器的反射攻击。我们建立了三个回归模型,包括 Ridge、Elastic Net 和 LASSO。据我们所知,目前还没有研究不同回归模型以了解大型网络中反射攻击模式的工作。在本文中,我们(a) 提出了一种识别反射攻击相关性的方法,(b) 在真实 NetFlow 数据上评估了三种回归模型。我们的结果表明:(a) 对 NTP 服务器的反射攻击没有关联性;(b) 对 NetBIOS 服务器的反射攻击没有关联性;(c) 这些反射攻击产生的流量没有使 NTP 和 NetBIOS 服务器不堪重负;(d) 对 NTP 和 NetBIOS 服务器的反射攻击的停留时间太短,无法预测对这些服务器的反射攻击。我们在反射攻击识别方面的工作强调了一些建议,这些建议有助于更好地处理大型网络中的反射攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An empirical study of reflection attacks using NetFlow data

Reflection attacks are one of the most intimidating threats organizations face. A reflection attack is a special type of distributed denial-of-service attack that amplifies the amount of malicious traffic by using reflectors and hides the identity of the attacker. Reflection attacks are known to be one of the most common causes of service disruption in large networks. Large networks perform extensive logging of NetFlow data, and parsing this data is an advocated basis for identifying network attacks. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of NetFlow data containing 1.7 billion NetFlow records and identified reflection attacks on the network time protocol (NTP) and NetBIOS servers. We set up three regression models including the Ridge, Elastic Net and LASSO. To the best of our knowledge, there is no work that studied different regression models to understand patterns of reflection attacks in a large network. In this paper, we (a) propose an approach for identifying correlations of reflection attacks, and (b) evaluate the three regression models on real NetFlow data. Our results show that (a) reflection attacks on the NTP servers are not correlated, (b) reflection attacks on the NetBIOS servers are not correlated, (c) the traffic generated by those reflection attacks did not overwhelm the NTP and NetBIOS servers, and (d) the dwell times of reflection attacks on the NTP and NetBIOS servers are too small for predicting reflection attacks on these servers. Our work on reflection attacks identification highlights recommendations that could facilitate better handling of reflection attacks in large networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cloud EMRs auditing with decentralized (t, n)-threshold ownership transfer SIFT: Sifting file types—application of explainable artificial intelligence in cyber forensics Modelling user notification scenarios in privacy policies FLSec-RPL: a fuzzy logic-based intrusion detection scheme for securing RPL-based IoT networks against DIO neighbor suppression attacks New partial key exposure attacks on RSA with additive exponent blinding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1