矽肺患者肺活量保留率受损与死亡率和气流阻塞的关系:纵向队列研究

Shuyuan Yang, Lap Ah Tse
{"title":"矽肺患者肺活量保留率受损与死亡率和气流阻塞的关系:纵向队列研究","authors":"Shuyuan Yang, Lap Ah Tse","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.27.24309566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale\nPreserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined as an impaired forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) with a preserved ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC), is associated with increased risk of airflow obstruction (AFO) and mortality in the general population. However, evidence is limited among the individuals with silicosis, an old occupational disease with an ongoing outbreak in some developed countries.\nObjectives\nTo investigate the association of PRISm with the risk of mortality and incident AFO in a cohort of workers with silicosis.\nMethods\nA total of 4315 workers aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with silicosis at the Pneumoconiosis Clinic, Tuberculosis and Chest Service during 1981-2019 were enrolled in this study and followed up for a median of 12.3 years till 31 December 2019. Spirometry was included in the diagnostic examination of silicosis and follow-up reassessments. Lung function categories of participants were classified as normal spirometry (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted), PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, FEV1 < 80% predicted), and AFO (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, body mass index, tuberculosis history, smoking, and radiographic characteristics.\nMeasurements and Main Results\nDuring the follow-up period, a total of 2399 (55.6%) subjects died, 1359 of whom died from respiratory-related diseases, and 780 subjects developed AFO. Subjects with PRISm had significantly increased multivariable-adjusted risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR=1.63, 95% CI 1.44-1.85) and respiratory-related mortality (adjusted HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.48-2.05) as compared with the those with normal spirometry. Besides, there was a higher risk of developing AFO in subjects with PRISm than in those with normal spirometry (adjusted HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75). No significant interaction was observed between PRISm and smoking status in the risk of all-cause mortality and incident AFO.\nConclusions\nPRISm is significantly associated with increased all-cause and respiratory-related mortality and a greater risk of progression to AFO among the individuals with silicosis.","PeriodicalId":501074,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of preserved ratio impaired spirometry with mortality and airflow obstruction in the silicotics: a longitudinal cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Shuyuan Yang, Lap Ah Tse\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.27.24309566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale\\nPreserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined as an impaired forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) with a preserved ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC), is associated with increased risk of airflow obstruction (AFO) and mortality in the general population. However, evidence is limited among the individuals with silicosis, an old occupational disease with an ongoing outbreak in some developed countries.\\nObjectives\\nTo investigate the association of PRISm with the risk of mortality and incident AFO in a cohort of workers with silicosis.\\nMethods\\nA total of 4315 workers aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with silicosis at the Pneumoconiosis Clinic, Tuberculosis and Chest Service during 1981-2019 were enrolled in this study and followed up for a median of 12.3 years till 31 December 2019. Spirometry was included in the diagnostic examination of silicosis and follow-up reassessments. Lung function categories of participants were classified as normal spirometry (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted), PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, FEV1 < 80% predicted), and AFO (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, body mass index, tuberculosis history, smoking, and radiographic characteristics.\\nMeasurements and Main Results\\nDuring the follow-up period, a total of 2399 (55.6%) subjects died, 1359 of whom died from respiratory-related diseases, and 780 subjects developed AFO. Subjects with PRISm had significantly increased multivariable-adjusted risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR=1.63, 95% CI 1.44-1.85) and respiratory-related mortality (adjusted HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.48-2.05) as compared with the those with normal spirometry. Besides, there was a higher risk of developing AFO in subjects with PRISm than in those with normal spirometry (adjusted HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75). No significant interaction was observed between PRISm and smoking status in the risk of all-cause mortality and incident AFO.\\nConclusions\\nPRISm is significantly associated with increased all-cause and respiratory-related mortality and a greater risk of progression to AFO among the individuals with silicosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.27.24309566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.27.24309566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论依据肺活量保留比值受损(PRISm)是指一秒钟用力呼气容积(FEV1)受损,但 FEV1 与用力呼吸容量(FVC)的比值保持不变,它与普通人群气流阻塞(AFO)和死亡风险的增加有关。方法1981-2019年期间,共有4315名年龄在18-80岁之间、在肺尘埃沉着病门诊、肺结核和胸科被诊断患有矽肺病的工人被纳入本研究,并随访至2019年12月31日,随访时间中位数为12.3年。肺活量测定包括在矽肺诊断检查和随访复查中。参与者的肺功能类别分为肺活量正常(FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7,FEV1 ≥ 80% 预测值)、PRISm(FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7,FEV1 < 80% 预测值)和 AFO(FEV1/FVC < 0.7)。在随访期间,共有 2399 例(55.6%)受试者死亡,其中 1359 例死于呼吸系统相关疾病,780 例受试者出现 AFO。与肺活量正常的受试者相比,PRISm受试者的全因死亡(调整后HR=1.63,95% CI 1.44-1.85)和呼吸相关死亡(调整后HR=1.74,95% CI 1.48-2.05)的多变量调整风险明显增加。此外,与肺活量正常者相比,PRISm 患者发生 AFO 的风险更高(调整后 HR=1.46,95% CI 1.22-1.75)。结论PRISm与矽肺患者的全因死亡率和呼吸系统相关死亡率升高有明显关系,而且矽肺患者发展为AFO的风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of preserved ratio impaired spirometry with mortality and airflow obstruction in the silicotics: a longitudinal cohort study
Rationale Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), defined as an impaired forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) with a preserved ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC), is associated with increased risk of airflow obstruction (AFO) and mortality in the general population. However, evidence is limited among the individuals with silicosis, an old occupational disease with an ongoing outbreak in some developed countries. Objectives To investigate the association of PRISm with the risk of mortality and incident AFO in a cohort of workers with silicosis. Methods A total of 4315 workers aged 18-80 years and diagnosed with silicosis at the Pneumoconiosis Clinic, Tuberculosis and Chest Service during 1981-2019 were enrolled in this study and followed up for a median of 12.3 years till 31 December 2019. Spirometry was included in the diagnostic examination of silicosis and follow-up reassessments. Lung function categories of participants were classified as normal spirometry (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted), PRISm (FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7, FEV1 < 80% predicted), and AFO (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, body mass index, tuberculosis history, smoking, and radiographic characteristics. Measurements and Main Results During the follow-up period, a total of 2399 (55.6%) subjects died, 1359 of whom died from respiratory-related diseases, and 780 subjects developed AFO. Subjects with PRISm had significantly increased multivariable-adjusted risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR=1.63, 95% CI 1.44-1.85) and respiratory-related mortality (adjusted HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.48-2.05) as compared with the those with normal spirometry. Besides, there was a higher risk of developing AFO in subjects with PRISm than in those with normal spirometry (adjusted HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75). No significant interaction was observed between PRISm and smoking status in the risk of all-cause mortality and incident AFO. Conclusions PRISm is significantly associated with increased all-cause and respiratory-related mortality and a greater risk of progression to AFO among the individuals with silicosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building and validating a predictive model for stroke risk in Chinese community-dwelling patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using machine learning methods CORELSA - Remote stethoscope system for fast and standardized auscultations of large numbers of patients with respiratory syndromes The post-viral GPNMB+ immune niche persists in long-term Covid, asthma, and COPD Lung functions among children and adolescents with sickle cell disease receiving care at Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital Kisumu, Kenya BMI-related Genetic Factors and COPD Imaging Phenotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1