通过形式逻辑和 LLM 自动检测需求矛盾

IF 2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Automated Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x
Alexander Elenga Gärtner, Dietmar Göhlich
{"title":"通过形式逻辑和 LLM 自动检测需求矛盾","authors":"Alexander Elenga Gärtner,&nbsp;Dietmar Göhlich","doi":"10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper introduces ALICE (Automated Logic for Identifying Contradictions in Engineering), a novel automated contradiction detection system tailored for formal requirements expressed in controlled natural language. By integrating formal logic with advanced large language models (LLMs), ALICE represents a significant leap forward in identifying and classifying contradictions within requirements documents. Our methodology, grounded on an expanded taxonomy of contradictions, employs a decision tree model addressing seven critical questions to ascertain the presence and type of contradictions. A pivotal achievement of our research is demonstrated through a comparative study, where ALICE’s performance markedly surpasses that of an LLM-only approach by detecting 60% of all contradictions. ALICE achieves a higher accuracy and recall rate, showcasing its efficacy in processing real-world, complex requirement datasets. Furthermore, the successful application of ALICE to real-world datasets validates its practical applicability and scalability. This work not only advances the automated detection of contradictions in formal requirements but also sets a precedent for the application of AI in enhancing reasoning systems within product development. We advocate for ALICE’s scalability and adaptability, presenting it as a cornerstone for future endeavors in model customization and dataset labeling, thereby contributing a substantial foundation to requirements engineering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated requirement contradiction detection through formal logic and LLMs\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Elenga Gärtner,&nbsp;Dietmar Göhlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper introduces ALICE (Automated Logic for Identifying Contradictions in Engineering), a novel automated contradiction detection system tailored for formal requirements expressed in controlled natural language. By integrating formal logic with advanced large language models (LLMs), ALICE represents a significant leap forward in identifying and classifying contradictions within requirements documents. Our methodology, grounded on an expanded taxonomy of contradictions, employs a decision tree model addressing seven critical questions to ascertain the presence and type of contradictions. A pivotal achievement of our research is demonstrated through a comparative study, where ALICE’s performance markedly surpasses that of an LLM-only approach by detecting 60% of all contradictions. ALICE achieves a higher accuracy and recall rate, showcasing its efficacy in processing real-world, complex requirement datasets. Furthermore, the successful application of ALICE to real-world datasets validates its practical applicability and scalability. This work not only advances the automated detection of contradictions in formal requirements but also sets a precedent for the application of AI in enhancing reasoning systems within product development. We advocate for ALICE’s scalability and adaptability, presenting it as a cornerstone for future endeavors in model customization and dataset labeling, thereby contributing a substantial foundation to requirements engineering.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automated Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automated Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-024-00452-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了 ALICE(用于识别工程中矛盾的自动逻辑),这是一个新颖的自动矛盾检测系统,专为用受控自然语言表达的形式化需求而量身定制。通过将形式逻辑与先进的大型语言模型(LLMs)相结合,ALICE 在识别和分类需求文档中的矛盾方面实现了重大飞跃。我们的方法以扩展的矛盾分类法为基础,采用决策树模型解决七个关键问题,以确定矛盾的存在和类型。通过对比研究,我们证明了我们研究的一项关键成果:ALICE 的性能明显超过了纯 LLM 方法,能检测出 60% 的矛盾。ALICE 实现了更高的准确率和召回率,展示了其在处理现实世界复杂需求数据集时的功效。此外,ALICE 在现实世界数据集上的成功应用也验证了它的实用性和可扩展性。这项工作不仅推进了形式化需求中矛盾的自动检测,还为应用人工智能增强产品开发中的推理系统开创了先例。我们提倡 ALICE 的可扩展性和适应性,将其作为未来模型定制和数据集标注工作的基石,从而为需求工程学奠定坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automated requirement contradiction detection through formal logic and LLMs

This paper introduces ALICE (Automated Logic for Identifying Contradictions in Engineering), a novel automated contradiction detection system tailored for formal requirements expressed in controlled natural language. By integrating formal logic with advanced large language models (LLMs), ALICE represents a significant leap forward in identifying and classifying contradictions within requirements documents. Our methodology, grounded on an expanded taxonomy of contradictions, employs a decision tree model addressing seven critical questions to ascertain the presence and type of contradictions. A pivotal achievement of our research is demonstrated through a comparative study, where ALICE’s performance markedly surpasses that of an LLM-only approach by detecting 60% of all contradictions. ALICE achieves a higher accuracy and recall rate, showcasing its efficacy in processing real-world, complex requirement datasets. Furthermore, the successful application of ALICE to real-world datasets validates its practical applicability and scalability. This work not only advances the automated detection of contradictions in formal requirements but also sets a precedent for the application of AI in enhancing reasoning systems within product development. We advocate for ALICE’s scalability and adaptability, presenting it as a cornerstone for future endeavors in model customization and dataset labeling, thereby contributing a substantial foundation to requirements engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
期刊最新文献
MP: motion program synthesis with machine learning interpretability and knowledge graph analogy LLM-enhanced evolutionary test generation for untyped languages Context-aware code summarization with multi-relational graph neural network Enhancing multi-objective test case selection through the mutation operator BadCodePrompt: backdoor attacks against prompt engineering of large language models for code generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1