有和没有结构化口腔保健计划的疗养院口腔卫生比较分析

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Gerodontology Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1111/ger.12773
Lynn E. Janssens, Emma Temmerman, Jonas Maertens, Luc De Visschere, Mirko Petrovic, Barbara E. Janssens
{"title":"有和没有结构化口腔保健计划的疗养院口腔卫生比较分析","authors":"Lynn E. Janssens, Emma Temmerman, Jonas Maertens, Luc De Visschere, Mirko Petrovic, Barbara E. Janssens","doi":"10.1111/ger.12773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the oral hygiene (dental and denture plaque) among residents in nursing homes that have implemented an oral healthcare programme (Gerodent) with that of residents in nursing homes that provide standard oral care.BackgroundGerodent is a comprehensive oral healthcare programme introduced in 2010, which includes mobile on‐site professional oral care. Sixty‐two nursing homes have actively implemented Gerodent between 8 and 12 years preceding this study.MethodsA cross‐sectional study compared a cluster random sample of Gerodent nursing home residents to residents of matched control nursing homes. Residents' dental (Turesky Index) and denture plaque (Augsburger &amp; Elahi Index) scores were collected as primary outcome variables. Data on tongue plaque, oral hygiene aids and demographic characteristics were recorded. Data were collected between 2020 and 2023. Generalised estimating equations were used to compare the oral hygiene between both study groups.ResultsResidents in the Gerodent group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 171) had significantly lower mean dental and denture plaque scores than their counterparts in the non‐Gerodent group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 159; dental plaque 1.68 vs. 2.71; RR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23–0.44; and denture plaque 1.60 vs. 2.21; RR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.42–0.72). While basic oral hygiene aids were available to most residents in both groups, denture brushes were more common in the Gerodent group.ConclusionResidents in Gerodent nursing homes had significantly better oral hygiene than those older people residing in non‐Gerodent nursing homes, although plaque scores were insufficient to prevent oral conditions. Oral health professionals need to work with and provide ongoing support in long‐term care facilities to further improve oral hygiene.","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of oral hygiene in nursing homes with and without a structured oral healthcare programme\",\"authors\":\"Lynn E. Janssens, Emma Temmerman, Jonas Maertens, Luc De Visschere, Mirko Petrovic, Barbara E. Janssens\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ger.12773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the oral hygiene (dental and denture plaque) among residents in nursing homes that have implemented an oral healthcare programme (Gerodent) with that of residents in nursing homes that provide standard oral care.BackgroundGerodent is a comprehensive oral healthcare programme introduced in 2010, which includes mobile on‐site professional oral care. Sixty‐two nursing homes have actively implemented Gerodent between 8 and 12 years preceding this study.MethodsA cross‐sectional study compared a cluster random sample of Gerodent nursing home residents to residents of matched control nursing homes. Residents' dental (Turesky Index) and denture plaque (Augsburger &amp; Elahi Index) scores were collected as primary outcome variables. Data on tongue plaque, oral hygiene aids and demographic characteristics were recorded. Data were collected between 2020 and 2023. Generalised estimating equations were used to compare the oral hygiene between both study groups.ResultsResidents in the Gerodent group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 171) had significantly lower mean dental and denture plaque scores than their counterparts in the non‐Gerodent group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 159; dental plaque 1.68 vs. 2.71; RR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23–0.44; and denture plaque 1.60 vs. 2.21; RR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.42–0.72). While basic oral hygiene aids were available to most residents in both groups, denture brushes were more common in the Gerodent group.ConclusionResidents in Gerodent nursing homes had significantly better oral hygiene than those older people residing in non‐Gerodent nursing homes, although plaque scores were insufficient to prevent oral conditions. Oral health professionals need to work with and provide ongoing support in long‐term care facilities to further improve oral hygiene.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerodontology\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12773\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12773","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较已实施口腔保健计划(Gerodent)的疗养院居民与提供标准口腔护理的疗养院居民的口腔卫生(牙菌斑和义齿菌斑)情况。背景 Gerodent 是 2010 年推出的一项综合口腔保健计划,其中包括流动现场专业口腔护理。在本研究之前的 8 至 12 年间,有 62 家疗养院积极实施了杰罗登计划。方法横断面研究比较了杰罗登疗养院居民与匹配对照疗养院居民的分组随机样本。研究收集了居民的牙菌斑(Turesky 指数)和义齿菌斑(Augsburger & Elahi 指数)评分作为主要结果变量。此外,还记录了舌菌斑、口腔卫生辅助工具和人口统计学特征等数据。数据收集时间为 2020 年至 2023 年。结果格罗丹特组(n = 171)居民的平均牙菌斑和义齿菌斑评分明显低于非格罗丹特组(n = 159;牙菌斑 1.68 vs. 2.71;RR 0.32;95% CI:0.23-0.44;义齿菌斑 1.60 vs. 2.21;RR 0.55;95% CI:0.42-0.72)。结论虽然牙菌斑评分不足以预防口腔疾病,但Gerodent护理院的住户口腔卫生状况明显优于非Gerodent护理院的老年人。口腔卫生专业人员需要与长期护理机构合作并提供持续支持,以进一步改善口腔卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of oral hygiene in nursing homes with and without a structured oral healthcare programme
ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the oral hygiene (dental and denture plaque) among residents in nursing homes that have implemented an oral healthcare programme (Gerodent) with that of residents in nursing homes that provide standard oral care.BackgroundGerodent is a comprehensive oral healthcare programme introduced in 2010, which includes mobile on‐site professional oral care. Sixty‐two nursing homes have actively implemented Gerodent between 8 and 12 years preceding this study.MethodsA cross‐sectional study compared a cluster random sample of Gerodent nursing home residents to residents of matched control nursing homes. Residents' dental (Turesky Index) and denture plaque (Augsburger & Elahi Index) scores were collected as primary outcome variables. Data on tongue plaque, oral hygiene aids and demographic characteristics were recorded. Data were collected between 2020 and 2023. Generalised estimating equations were used to compare the oral hygiene between both study groups.ResultsResidents in the Gerodent group (n = 171) had significantly lower mean dental and denture plaque scores than their counterparts in the non‐Gerodent group (n = 159; dental plaque 1.68 vs. 2.71; RR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23–0.44; and denture plaque 1.60 vs. 2.21; RR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.42–0.72). While basic oral hygiene aids were available to most residents in both groups, denture brushes were more common in the Gerodent group.ConclusionResidents in Gerodent nursing homes had significantly better oral hygiene than those older people residing in non‐Gerodent nursing homes, although plaque scores were insufficient to prevent oral conditions. Oral health professionals need to work with and provide ongoing support in long‐term care facilities to further improve oral hygiene.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
期刊最新文献
Natural products for denture base disinfection: A scoping review. Validity of the Oral Hygiene Ability Instrument (OHAI). Dentists' perceptions of providing care to community-dwelling older people. Distribution of Australian dental practices in relation to residential aged care facilities: A geographic analysis. Mandibular third molar coronectomy in older adults and its effects on oral health-related quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1