{"title":"灵敏度和特异性与精确度和召回率及相关难题","authors":"William Cullerne Bown","doi":"10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many evaluations of binary classifiers begin by adopting a pair of indicators, most often sensitivity and specificity or precision and recall. Despite this, we lack a general, pan-disciplinary basis for choosing one pair over the other, or over one of four other sibling pairs. Related obscurity afflicts the choice between the receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curve. Here, I return to first principles to separate concerns and distinguish more than 50 foundational concepts. This allows me to establish six rules that allow one to identify which pair is correct. The choice depends on the context in which the classifier is to operate, the intended use of the classifications, their intended user(s), and the measurability of the underlying classes, but not skew. The rules can be applied by those who develop, operate, or regulate them to classifiers composed of technology, people, or combinations of the two.</p>","PeriodicalId":50241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classification","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity and Specificity versus Precision and Recall, and Related Dilemmas\",\"authors\":\"William Cullerne Bown\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many evaluations of binary classifiers begin by adopting a pair of indicators, most often sensitivity and specificity or precision and recall. Despite this, we lack a general, pan-disciplinary basis for choosing one pair over the other, or over one of four other sibling pairs. Related obscurity afflicts the choice between the receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curve. Here, I return to first principles to separate concerns and distinguish more than 50 foundational concepts. This allows me to establish six rules that allow one to identify which pair is correct. The choice depends on the context in which the classifier is to operate, the intended use of the classifications, their intended user(s), and the measurability of the underlying classes, but not skew. The rules can be applied by those who develop, operate, or regulate them to classifiers composed of technology, people, or combinations of the two.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Classification\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Classification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sensitivity and Specificity versus Precision and Recall, and Related Dilemmas
Many evaluations of binary classifiers begin by adopting a pair of indicators, most often sensitivity and specificity or precision and recall. Despite this, we lack a general, pan-disciplinary basis for choosing one pair over the other, or over one of four other sibling pairs. Related obscurity afflicts the choice between the receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curve. Here, I return to first principles to separate concerns and distinguish more than 50 foundational concepts. This allows me to establish six rules that allow one to identify which pair is correct. The choice depends on the context in which the classifier is to operate, the intended use of the classifications, their intended user(s), and the measurability of the underlying classes, but not skew. The rules can be applied by those who develop, operate, or regulate them to classifiers composed of technology, people, or combinations of the two.
期刊介绍:
To publish original and valuable papers in the field of classification, numerical taxonomy, multidimensional scaling and other ordination techniques, clustering, tree structures and other network models (with somewhat less emphasis on principal components analysis, factor analysis, and discriminant analysis), as well as associated models and algorithms for fitting them. Articles will support advances in methodology while demonstrating compelling substantive applications. Comprehensive review articles are also acceptable. Contributions will represent disciplines such as statistics, psychology, biology, information retrieval, anthropology, archeology, astronomy, business, chemistry, computer science, economics, engineering, geography, geology, linguistics, marketing, mathematics, medicine, political science, psychiatry, sociology, and soil science.