布洛克特鹿的生态位广度和重叠:空间相似性限制了物种共存

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1111/jzo.13180
F. Grotta-Neto, A. Vogliotti, M. L. de Oliveira, F. C. Passos, J. M. Barbanti Duarte
{"title":"布洛克特鹿的生态位广度和重叠:空间相似性限制了物种共存","authors":"F. Grotta-Neto,&nbsp;A. Vogliotti,&nbsp;M. L. de Oliveira,&nbsp;F. C. Passos,&nbsp;J. M. Barbanti Duarte","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding species coexistence requires information about how species interact and partition their ecological niche. Niches of closely related species tend to be quite similar and thereby, when syntopic, overlap can result in competition when shared resources are limiting. Brocket deer of tropical forests are ecologically similar species due to convergence or relatedness. As a group, what little is known about their ecology suggests spatial and temporal niche separation while dietary differences among species remain largely unknown. The possibility of competition has been suggested, as it is rare for more than two species to co-occur. If competition is important, then it may limit syntopy of more species and its importance should increase with relatedness between species. Based on analyses of faecal samples, camera traps, and stable isotopes and multidimensional analysis of niche space, we test spatial, temporal and dietary niche differences and compare niche breadth in two syntopic species pairs: <i>Mazama rufa</i> with <i>M. nana</i> (both of subtribe Odocoileina) and <i>M. jucunda</i> (Odocoileina) with <i>Subulo gouazoubira</i> (Blastocerina). In 2007–2008 and 2017–2019, 240 faecal samples and 375 records were collected in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Spatial partitioning among both species pairs was found, with <i>S. gouazoubira</i> and <i>M. nana</i> having greater niche breadth, which may permit or facilitate coexistence. Odocoileina tend to be nocturnal, while Blastocerina tend to be diurnal, which suggests that phylogeny may influence species coexistence. Furthermore, the species tended to overlap with respect to diet. These results suggest interference competition avoidance by niche partitioning at the level of habitat and time, allowing coexistence. Thereby, despite the morphological similarities, brocket deer species of evolutionarily convergent subtribes preserve differences in ecological niche dimensions that facilitate the coexistence of their populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"324 1","pages":"21-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brocket deer niche breadth and overlap: spatial similarities limit species coexistence\",\"authors\":\"F. Grotta-Neto,&nbsp;A. Vogliotti,&nbsp;M. L. de Oliveira,&nbsp;F. C. Passos,&nbsp;J. M. Barbanti Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jzo.13180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding species coexistence requires information about how species interact and partition their ecological niche. Niches of closely related species tend to be quite similar and thereby, when syntopic, overlap can result in competition when shared resources are limiting. Brocket deer of tropical forests are ecologically similar species due to convergence or relatedness. As a group, what little is known about their ecology suggests spatial and temporal niche separation while dietary differences among species remain largely unknown. The possibility of competition has been suggested, as it is rare for more than two species to co-occur. If competition is important, then it may limit syntopy of more species and its importance should increase with relatedness between species. Based on analyses of faecal samples, camera traps, and stable isotopes and multidimensional analysis of niche space, we test spatial, temporal and dietary niche differences and compare niche breadth in two syntopic species pairs: <i>Mazama rufa</i> with <i>M. nana</i> (both of subtribe Odocoileina) and <i>M. jucunda</i> (Odocoileina) with <i>Subulo gouazoubira</i> (Blastocerina). In 2007–2008 and 2017–2019, 240 faecal samples and 375 records were collected in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Spatial partitioning among both species pairs was found, with <i>S. gouazoubira</i> and <i>M. nana</i> having greater niche breadth, which may permit or facilitate coexistence. Odocoileina tend to be nocturnal, while Blastocerina tend to be diurnal, which suggests that phylogeny may influence species coexistence. Furthermore, the species tended to overlap with respect to diet. These results suggest interference competition avoidance by niche partitioning at the level of habitat and time, allowing coexistence. Thereby, despite the morphological similarities, brocket deer species of evolutionarily convergent subtribes preserve differences in ecological niche dimensions that facilitate the coexistence of their populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":\"324 1\",\"pages\":\"21-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要了解物种共存的情况,就必须了解物种如何相互作用并划分其生态位。近缘物种的生态位往往十分相似,因此,当共享资源受到限制时,重叠会导致竞争。热带森林中的布洛克特鹿由于趋同或亲缘关系而成为生态上相似的物种。作为一个类群,人们对它们的生态学知之甚少,这表明它们在空间和时间上的生态位分离,而物种之间的饮食差异在很大程度上仍是未知数。有人认为可能存在竞争,因为很少有两个以上的物种同时出现。如果竞争很重要,那么它可能会限制更多物种的合成,而且其重要性会随着物种间亲缘关系的增加而增加。基于对粪便样本、相机陷阱和稳定同位素的分析,以及对生态位空间的多维分析,我们检验了空间、时间和食物生态位的差异,并比较了两个同源物种对的生态位广度:M. jucunda(Odocoileina)与Subulo gouazoubira(Blastocerina)。2007-2008 年和 2017-2019 年,在巴西大西洋森林收集了 240 份粪便样本和 375 条记录。发现这两个物种对之间存在空间分区,S. gouazoubira和M. nana的生态位广度更大,这可能允许或促进共存。褐飞虱倾向于夜间活动,而褐斑飞虱倾向于昼伏夜出,这表明系统发育可能会影响物种的共存。此外,这些物种的食性也趋于重叠。这些结果表明,在栖息地和时间层面上的生态位划分可以避免干扰竞争,从而实现共存。因此,尽管形态上相似,但在进化上趋同的亚部族锦鹿物种在生态位维度上保持着差异,从而促进了其种群的共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brocket deer niche breadth and overlap: spatial similarities limit species coexistence

Understanding species coexistence requires information about how species interact and partition their ecological niche. Niches of closely related species tend to be quite similar and thereby, when syntopic, overlap can result in competition when shared resources are limiting. Brocket deer of tropical forests are ecologically similar species due to convergence or relatedness. As a group, what little is known about their ecology suggests spatial and temporal niche separation while dietary differences among species remain largely unknown. The possibility of competition has been suggested, as it is rare for more than two species to co-occur. If competition is important, then it may limit syntopy of more species and its importance should increase with relatedness between species. Based on analyses of faecal samples, camera traps, and stable isotopes and multidimensional analysis of niche space, we test spatial, temporal and dietary niche differences and compare niche breadth in two syntopic species pairs: Mazama rufa with M. nana (both of subtribe Odocoileina) and M. jucunda (Odocoileina) with Subulo gouazoubira (Blastocerina). In 2007–2008 and 2017–2019, 240 faecal samples and 375 records were collected in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Spatial partitioning among both species pairs was found, with S. gouazoubira and M. nana having greater niche breadth, which may permit or facilitate coexistence. Odocoileina tend to be nocturnal, while Blastocerina tend to be diurnal, which suggests that phylogeny may influence species coexistence. Furthermore, the species tended to overlap with respect to diet. These results suggest interference competition avoidance by niche partitioning at the level of habitat and time, allowing coexistence. Thereby, despite the morphological similarities, brocket deer species of evolutionarily convergent subtribes preserve differences in ecological niche dimensions that facilitate the coexistence of their populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Mammal coloration as a social signal—the debate is still open: a comment on Howell and Caro (2024) Further thoughts on comparative analyses of coloration Night life: Positional behaviors and activity patterns of the Neotropical kinkajou, Potos flavus (Carnivora, Procyonidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1