在诊断卵巢癌时,无细胞 DNA 比临床和超声波信息更有价值

Adriaan Vanderstichele, Jolien Ceusters, Daniela Fischerova, Antonia Testa, Wouter Froyman, Chiara Landolfo, Ruben Heremans, Francesca Moro, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy, Thaïs Baert, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Toon Van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Pieter Busschaert, Tom Venken, Diether Lambrechts, Joris Robert Vermeesch, Tom Bourne, An Coosemans, Ben Van Calster, Dirk Timmerman
{"title":"在诊断卵巢癌时,无细胞 DNA 比临床和超声波信息更有价值","authors":"Adriaan Vanderstichele, Jolien Ceusters, Daniela Fischerova, Antonia Testa, Wouter Froyman, Chiara Landolfo, Ruben Heremans, Francesca Moro, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy, Thaïs Baert, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Toon Van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Pieter Busschaert, Tom Venken, Diether Lambrechts, Joris Robert Vermeesch, Tom Bourne, An Coosemans, Ben Van Calster, Dirk Timmerman","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.20.24309215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We previously proposed two cfDNA-based scores (genome-wide z-score and nucleosome score) as candidate non-invasive biomarkers to further improve pre-surgical diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. We aimed to investigate the added value of these cfDNA-based scores to the predictors of the ADNEX model (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy. Methods: 526 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively recruited in three oncology referral centers. cfDNA-based scores were calculated in pre-operative plasma samples. Logistic regression models were fitted for ADNEX predictors alone and after adding cfDNA scores. We reported likelihood ratio tests, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Net Benefit for thresholds between 5% and 40%. Results: The study included 272 benign, 86 borderline, 36 stage I invasive, 113 stage II-IV invasive, and 19 secondary metastatic tumors. The likelihood ratio tests for adding the cfDNA variables to the ADNEX model were statistically significant (p<0.001 for ADNEX without CA125, p=0.001 for ADNEX with CA125). The accompanying increases in AUC were 0.013 and 0.003. Net Benefit, sensitivity and specificity were similar for all models. The increase in Net Benefit at the recommended 10% threshold estimated risk of malignancy was 0.0017 and 0.0020, respectively. According to these results, adding cfDNA markers required at least 453 patients per additional true positive. Conclusion: Although statistically significant, the addition of the cfDNA scores to the ADNEX model do not improve the ADNEX model in a clinically meaningful way.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Added value of cell-free DNA over clinical and ultrasound information for diagnosing ovarian cancer\",\"authors\":\"Adriaan Vanderstichele, Jolien Ceusters, Daniela Fischerova, Antonia Testa, Wouter Froyman, Chiara Landolfo, Ruben Heremans, Francesca Moro, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy, Thaïs Baert, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Toon Van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Pieter Busschaert, Tom Venken, Diether Lambrechts, Joris Robert Vermeesch, Tom Bourne, An Coosemans, Ben Van Calster, Dirk Timmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.20.24309215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We previously proposed two cfDNA-based scores (genome-wide z-score and nucleosome score) as candidate non-invasive biomarkers to further improve pre-surgical diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. We aimed to investigate the added value of these cfDNA-based scores to the predictors of the ADNEX model (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy. Methods: 526 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively recruited in three oncology referral centers. cfDNA-based scores were calculated in pre-operative plasma samples. Logistic regression models were fitted for ADNEX predictors alone and after adding cfDNA scores. We reported likelihood ratio tests, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Net Benefit for thresholds between 5% and 40%. Results: The study included 272 benign, 86 borderline, 36 stage I invasive, 113 stage II-IV invasive, and 19 secondary metastatic tumors. The likelihood ratio tests for adding the cfDNA variables to the ADNEX model were statistically significant (p<0.001 for ADNEX without CA125, p=0.001 for ADNEX with CA125). The accompanying increases in AUC were 0.013 and 0.003. Net Benefit, sensitivity and specificity were similar for all models. The increase in Net Benefit at the recommended 10% threshold estimated risk of malignancy was 0.0017 and 0.0020, respectively. According to these results, adding cfDNA markers required at least 453 patients per additional true positive. Conclusion: Although statistically significant, the addition of the cfDNA scores to the ADNEX model do not improve the ADNEX model in a clinically meaningful way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.20.24309215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.20.24309215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们之前提出了两种基于cfDNA的评分(全基因组z-score和核糖体评分)作为候选非侵入性生物标志物,以进一步改善卵巢恶性肿瘤的术前诊断。我们旨在研究这些基于 cfDNA 的评分对 ADNEX 模型(附件不同肿瘤评估)预测指标的附加值,以估算卵巢恶性肿瘤的风险。方法:在三家肿瘤学转诊中心连续招募了 526 名计划接受手术的附件肿块患者,计算术前血浆样本中基于 cfDNA 的评分。对单独的 ADNEX 预测因子和加入 cfDNA 评分后的 ADNEX 预测因子分别拟合了逻辑回归模型。我们报告了似然比检验、接收者操作特征曲线(Receiver Operating Characteristic curve,AUC)下的面积、灵敏度、特异性以及 5% 至 40% 临界值的净收益。研究结果研究包括 272 个良性肿瘤、86 个边缘肿瘤、36 个 I 期浸润性肿瘤、113 个 II-IV 期浸润性肿瘤和 19 个继发性转移肿瘤。在 ADNEX 模型中加入 cfDNA 变量的似然比检验具有统计学意义(不含 CA125 的 ADNEX 的 p<0.001,含 CA125 的 ADNEX 的 p=0.001)。AUC相应增加了0.013和0.003。所有模型的净效益、灵敏度和特异性相似。在推荐的 10%恶性肿瘤估计风险阈值下,净效益分别增加了 0.0017 和 0.0020。根据这些结果,增加 cfDNA 标记每增加一个真阳性至少需要 453 名患者。结论:虽然在统计学上有意义,但在 ADNEX 模型中加入 cfDNA 评分并不能改善 ADNEX 模型的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Added value of cell-free DNA over clinical and ultrasound information for diagnosing ovarian cancer
Background: We previously proposed two cfDNA-based scores (genome-wide z-score and nucleosome score) as candidate non-invasive biomarkers to further improve pre-surgical diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. We aimed to investigate the added value of these cfDNA-based scores to the predictors of the ADNEX model (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy. Methods: 526 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively recruited in three oncology referral centers. cfDNA-based scores were calculated in pre-operative plasma samples. Logistic regression models were fitted for ADNEX predictors alone and after adding cfDNA scores. We reported likelihood ratio tests, the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Net Benefit for thresholds between 5% and 40%. Results: The study included 272 benign, 86 borderline, 36 stage I invasive, 113 stage II-IV invasive, and 19 secondary metastatic tumors. The likelihood ratio tests for adding the cfDNA variables to the ADNEX model were statistically significant (p<0.001 for ADNEX without CA125, p=0.001 for ADNEX with CA125). The accompanying increases in AUC were 0.013 and 0.003. Net Benefit, sensitivity and specificity were similar for all models. The increase in Net Benefit at the recommended 10% threshold estimated risk of malignancy was 0.0017 and 0.0020, respectively. According to these results, adding cfDNA markers required at least 453 patients per additional true positive. Conclusion: Although statistically significant, the addition of the cfDNA scores to the ADNEX model do not improve the ADNEX model in a clinically meaningful way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda Impact and factors affecting unplanned out-of-hospital birth on newborns at University Hospital compared to in-hospital born newborns Effectiveness of the modified WHO labour care guide to detect prolonged and obstructed labour among women admitted at publicly funded facilities in rural Mbarara district, Southwestern Uganda: an ambispective cohort study ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1