内森-艾伦-琼斯的《突变诗学》(评论)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1353/abr.2024.a929678
Will Luers
{"title":"内森-艾伦-琼斯的《突变诗学》(评论)","authors":"Will Luers","doi":"10.1353/abr.2024.a929678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Glitch Poetics</em> by Nathan Allen Jones <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Will Luers (bio) </li> </ul> <em><small>glitch poetics</small></em><br/> Nathan Allen Jones<br/> Open Humanities Press<br/> http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/glitch-poetics/<br/> 284 pages; Print, $25.00 <p>In <em>Glitch Poetics</em>, Nathan Allen Jones extends the already extended meaning of the term \"glitch,\" at once a technical error and a ubiquitous expressive art technique that in many ways has come to define a digital aesthetic. Jones presents glitch as a contemporary literary strategy that seeks to model and critique what it is like to live inside a global 24/7 technical infrastructure. The term was first used in 1962 by astronaut John Glenn in reference to an electrical surge on a space expedition and has since come to mean the result or outcome of a breakdown in any technical system. Glitch as a digital art aesthetic is an appreciation and celebration of such outcomes, when a computer's deterministic system gives way to something spontaneous, beautiful, and outside human intention. Glitch art's startling bursts of colored pixel blocks, often accompanied by glitched sound in commercials and popular movies, have become signifiers for our technical future—whether it is utopian or dystopian. But Jones is not interested in telling a history of expressive glitch. Such a task would be too complex to cover. When did intentional error in art or literature begin? In the eighteenth century, with Sterne's artful inability to tell a proper story? In the nineteenth, with Mallarmé tossing words around the poetic page? In the early twentieth, with Picasso's broken perspective? From 1970s experimental filmmakers scratching and burning film strips to 1980s avant-garde video artists bending and interrupting video signals, each new machine for artistic expression seems eventually to find cultural value in that machine's dysfunction. The frustrating glitchiness of the early web—plug-ins not working, pages failing to load, code interrupting flows of text <strong>[End Page 134]</strong> and image—was embraced by net artists such as the collective JODI and Olia Lialina. Jones does touch on these and many of the important visual glitch artists—Nick Briz, Rosa Menkman, Jon Satrom—but only to provide a context for exploring the mostly untold history of glitch in literary expression.</p> <p>While visual and sound glitch artists seek out \"wrongness\" by manipulating code or disrupting hardware or software functionality, the \"wrongness\" in language arts has a different creative methodology. Literary glitch aims for what Jones calls \"media realism.\" The performance artists, poets, and novelists explored in <em>Glitch Poetics</em> do sometimes play with devices, signals, and data, but with an intention to expose human/machine systems where incongruous, complex, and unpredictable patterns emerge. Literary glitch makes visible the postdigital condition in which daily life succumbs to</p> <blockquote> <p>trolls, spambots, and other malicious actors online, the grotesquely enticing word-salad of SEO-optimized headlines, the way that corporate decisions filter through into our textual environment and social sphere, the startling data on climate and social change …</p> </blockquote> <p>The artist/writers Jones explores cast glitchiness as harmful cognitive and physical forces coming from technical systems that govern our internal and external lives. The human counter-force to the machine is a poetics that adopts glitch techniques and effects, mostly borrowed from the visual arts, to reveal a postdigital experience of \"hindrance, aimlessness, [and] lostness.\"</p> <p>In literary readings of performance artists Erica Scourti and Carline Bergvall, Jones explores how devices and software that are intended as supportive to language expression and reception—voice recording, speed reader apps, auto translation, and predictive text—are used to create \"glitchfrastructures,\" odd zones where machine and human logics breakdown. Scourti's <em>Negative Docs</em> uses a speed reader app to perform a rereading of the artist's diary of depression. The inability to keep up with the \"accelerating semiotic extraction\" of the app reveals the misaligned intentions of human and machine: the app wants to fulfill its purpose of speedy retention, while the human reader is slowed down by the emotions in the text's meaning. Bergvall's \"About Face\" layers three levels of glitchiness: a poem is auto-transcribed from a recording of a reading by the poet after a painful tooth extraction. The result is a printed poem of...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":41337,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glitch Poetics by Nathan Allen Jones (review)\",\"authors\":\"Will Luers\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/abr.2024.a929678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Glitch Poetics</em> by Nathan Allen Jones <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Will Luers (bio) </li> </ul> <em><small>glitch poetics</small></em><br/> Nathan Allen Jones<br/> Open Humanities Press<br/> http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/glitch-poetics/<br/> 284 pages; Print, $25.00 <p>In <em>Glitch Poetics</em>, Nathan Allen Jones extends the already extended meaning of the term \\\"glitch,\\\" at once a technical error and a ubiquitous expressive art technique that in many ways has come to define a digital aesthetic. Jones presents glitch as a contemporary literary strategy that seeks to model and critique what it is like to live inside a global 24/7 technical infrastructure. The term was first used in 1962 by astronaut John Glenn in reference to an electrical surge on a space expedition and has since come to mean the result or outcome of a breakdown in any technical system. Glitch as a digital art aesthetic is an appreciation and celebration of such outcomes, when a computer's deterministic system gives way to something spontaneous, beautiful, and outside human intention. Glitch art's startling bursts of colored pixel blocks, often accompanied by glitched sound in commercials and popular movies, have become signifiers for our technical future—whether it is utopian or dystopian. But Jones is not interested in telling a history of expressive glitch. Such a task would be too complex to cover. When did intentional error in art or literature begin? In the eighteenth century, with Sterne's artful inability to tell a proper story? In the nineteenth, with Mallarmé tossing words around the poetic page? In the early twentieth, with Picasso's broken perspective? From 1970s experimental filmmakers scratching and burning film strips to 1980s avant-garde video artists bending and interrupting video signals, each new machine for artistic expression seems eventually to find cultural value in that machine's dysfunction. The frustrating glitchiness of the early web—plug-ins not working, pages failing to load, code interrupting flows of text <strong>[End Page 134]</strong> and image—was embraced by net artists such as the collective JODI and Olia Lialina. Jones does touch on these and many of the important visual glitch artists—Nick Briz, Rosa Menkman, Jon Satrom—but only to provide a context for exploring the mostly untold history of glitch in literary expression.</p> <p>While visual and sound glitch artists seek out \\\"wrongness\\\" by manipulating code or disrupting hardware or software functionality, the \\\"wrongness\\\" in language arts has a different creative methodology. Literary glitch aims for what Jones calls \\\"media realism.\\\" The performance artists, poets, and novelists explored in <em>Glitch Poetics</em> do sometimes play with devices, signals, and data, but with an intention to expose human/machine systems where incongruous, complex, and unpredictable patterns emerge. Literary glitch makes visible the postdigital condition in which daily life succumbs to</p> <blockquote> <p>trolls, spambots, and other malicious actors online, the grotesquely enticing word-salad of SEO-optimized headlines, the way that corporate decisions filter through into our textual environment and social sphere, the startling data on climate and social change …</p> </blockquote> <p>The artist/writers Jones explores cast glitchiness as harmful cognitive and physical forces coming from technical systems that govern our internal and external lives. The human counter-force to the machine is a poetics that adopts glitch techniques and effects, mostly borrowed from the visual arts, to reveal a postdigital experience of \\\"hindrance, aimlessness, [and] lostness.\\\"</p> <p>In literary readings of performance artists Erica Scourti and Carline Bergvall, Jones explores how devices and software that are intended as supportive to language expression and reception—voice recording, speed reader apps, auto translation, and predictive text—are used to create \\\"glitchfrastructures,\\\" odd zones where machine and human logics breakdown. Scourti's <em>Negative Docs</em> uses a speed reader app to perform a rereading of the artist's diary of depression. The inability to keep up with the \\\"accelerating semiotic extraction\\\" of the app reveals the misaligned intentions of human and machine: the app wants to fulfill its purpose of speedy retention, while the human reader is slowed down by the emotions in the text's meaning. Bergvall's \\\"About Face\\\" layers three levels of glitchiness: a poem is auto-transcribed from a recording of a reading by the poet after a painful tooth extraction. The result is a printed poem of...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2024.a929678\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/abr.2024.a929678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 内森-艾伦-琼斯(Nathan Allen Jones)著,威尔-卢尔斯(Will Luers)译(简历):《突变诗学》(Glitch Poetics),内森-艾伦-琼斯(Nathan Allen Jones)著,开放人文出版社 http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/glitch-poetics/,284 页;印刷版,25.00 美元 在《突变诗学》中,内森-艾伦-琼斯扩展了 "突变 "一词已经延伸的含义。"突变 "既是一种技术错误,也是一种无处不在的艺术表现手法,在许多方面已经成为数字美学的定义。琼斯认为,"故障 "是一种当代文学策略,旨在模拟和批判生活在全球全天候技术基础设施中的感受。1962 年,宇航员约翰-格伦(John Glenn)在提到一次太空探险中的电涌时首次使用了这个词,此后,它便被用来指任何技术系统故障的结果或后果。作为一种数字艺术美学,"突变 "是对这种结果的欣赏和赞美,当计算机的确定性系统让位于自发的、美丽的、超出人类意图的东西时,"突变 "就会出现。在商业广告和流行电影中,突波艺术的彩色像素块往往伴随着 "突波 "的声音,成为我们技术未来的标志--无论它是乌托邦式的还是歇斯底里式的。但是,琼斯并不想讲述一部表现性 "突波 "的历史。这样的任务太过复杂,难以涵盖。艺术或文学中的故意错误始于何时?十八世纪,斯特恩在艺术上无法讲述一个恰当的故事?十九世纪,马拉美在诗歌页面上随心所欲地乱写乱画?二十世纪初,毕加索的断裂视角?从 20 世纪 70 年代实验电影制作人对胶片的刮擦和焚烧,到 80 年代前卫录像艺术家对录像信号的弯曲和中断,每一种新的艺术表达机器似乎最终都能从机器的功能失调中找到文化价值。早期网络令人沮丧的故障--插件失效、网页无法加载、代码打断文字 [尾页 134]和图像的流动--被网络艺术家们所接受,如 JODI 和 Olia Lialina。琼斯确实提到了这些艺术家和许多重要的视觉抽动艺术家--尼克-布里兹、罗莎-门克曼、乔恩-萨特罗姆--但这只是为了提供一个背景,以探索文学表达中大多不为人知的抽动历史。视觉和声音方面的滑稽艺术家通过操纵代码或破坏硬件或软件功能来寻找 "错误",而语言艺术中的 "错误 "则有不同的创作方法。语言艺术中的 "错觉 "有着不同的创作方法。文学上的错觉旨在实现琼斯所说的 "媒体现实主义"。突变诗学》中探讨的行为艺术家、诗人和小说家有时确实会玩弄设备、信号和数据,但他们的目的是揭露人类/机器系统中出现的不协调、复杂和不可预测的模式。文学上的 "小毛病 "让人们看到了后数字时代的状况,在这种状况下,日常生活屈从于巨魔、垃圾邮件机器人和其他恶意的网络行为者,搜索引擎优化标题的怪诞诱人的文字沙拉,企业决策过滤到我们的文字环境和社会领域的方式,关于气候和社会变化的惊人数据......琼斯探索的艺术家/作家将 "小毛病 "视为来自技术系统的有害的认知和物理力量,这些技术系统支配着我们的内部和外部生活。人类对机器的反作用力是一种诗学,它采用了大多借鉴自视觉艺术的故障技术和效果,揭示了一种 "阻碍、漫无目的、[和]迷失 "的后数字体验。在对表演艺术家埃里卡-斯库尔蒂(Erica Scourti)和卡琳-伯格瓦尔(Carline Bergvall)的文学解读中,琼斯探索了旨在支持语言表达和接收的设备和软件--录音、快速阅读应用程序、自动翻译和预测性文本--是如何被用来创造 "突变基础结构 "的,即机器和人类逻辑崩溃的奇特区域。Scourti 的 "Negative Docs "使用快速阅读应用程序来重读艺术家的抑郁日记。无法跟上应用程序 "加速符号提取 "的速度,揭示了人类和机器的意图错位:应用程序希望达到快速保留的目的,而人类读者则被文本意义中的情感拖慢了速度。伯格瓦尔(Bergvall)的 "关于脸"(About Face)一共有三个层次的故障:一首诗是根据诗人在一次痛苦的拔牙后的朗读录音自动转录的。结果是一首印刷的诗歌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glitch Poetics by Nathan Allen Jones (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Glitch Poetics by Nathan Allen Jones
  • Will Luers (bio)
glitch poetics
Nathan Allen Jones
Open Humanities Press
http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/glitch-poetics/
284 pages; Print, $25.00

In Glitch Poetics, Nathan Allen Jones extends the already extended meaning of the term "glitch," at once a technical error and a ubiquitous expressive art technique that in many ways has come to define a digital aesthetic. Jones presents glitch as a contemporary literary strategy that seeks to model and critique what it is like to live inside a global 24/7 technical infrastructure. The term was first used in 1962 by astronaut John Glenn in reference to an electrical surge on a space expedition and has since come to mean the result or outcome of a breakdown in any technical system. Glitch as a digital art aesthetic is an appreciation and celebration of such outcomes, when a computer's deterministic system gives way to something spontaneous, beautiful, and outside human intention. Glitch art's startling bursts of colored pixel blocks, often accompanied by glitched sound in commercials and popular movies, have become signifiers for our technical future—whether it is utopian or dystopian. But Jones is not interested in telling a history of expressive glitch. Such a task would be too complex to cover. When did intentional error in art or literature begin? In the eighteenth century, with Sterne's artful inability to tell a proper story? In the nineteenth, with Mallarmé tossing words around the poetic page? In the early twentieth, with Picasso's broken perspective? From 1970s experimental filmmakers scratching and burning film strips to 1980s avant-garde video artists bending and interrupting video signals, each new machine for artistic expression seems eventually to find cultural value in that machine's dysfunction. The frustrating glitchiness of the early web—plug-ins not working, pages failing to load, code interrupting flows of text [End Page 134] and image—was embraced by net artists such as the collective JODI and Olia Lialina. Jones does touch on these and many of the important visual glitch artists—Nick Briz, Rosa Menkman, Jon Satrom—but only to provide a context for exploring the mostly untold history of glitch in literary expression.

While visual and sound glitch artists seek out "wrongness" by manipulating code or disrupting hardware or software functionality, the "wrongness" in language arts has a different creative methodology. Literary glitch aims for what Jones calls "media realism." The performance artists, poets, and novelists explored in Glitch Poetics do sometimes play with devices, signals, and data, but with an intention to expose human/machine systems where incongruous, complex, and unpredictable patterns emerge. Literary glitch makes visible the postdigital condition in which daily life succumbs to

trolls, spambots, and other malicious actors online, the grotesquely enticing word-salad of SEO-optimized headlines, the way that corporate decisions filter through into our textual environment and social sphere, the startling data on climate and social change …

The artist/writers Jones explores cast glitchiness as harmful cognitive and physical forces coming from technical systems that govern our internal and external lives. The human counter-force to the machine is a poetics that adopts glitch techniques and effects, mostly borrowed from the visual arts, to reveal a postdigital experience of "hindrance, aimlessness, [and] lostness."

In literary readings of performance artists Erica Scourti and Carline Bergvall, Jones explores how devices and software that are intended as supportive to language expression and reception—voice recording, speed reader apps, auto translation, and predictive text—are used to create "glitchfrastructures," odd zones where machine and human logics breakdown. Scourti's Negative Docs uses a speed reader app to perform a rereading of the artist's diary of depression. The inability to keep up with the "accelerating semiotic extraction" of the app reveals the misaligned intentions of human and machine: the app wants to fulfill its purpose of speedy retention, while the human reader is slowed down by the emotions in the text's meaning. Bergvall's "About Face" layers three levels of glitchiness: a poem is auto-transcribed from a recording of a reading by the poet after a painful tooth extraction. The result is a printed poem of...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW
AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
It's the Algorithm, Stupid! Conspiracy Theories in the Time of Covid-19 by Clare Birchall and Peter Knight (review) A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum (review) Conspiracy Theories and Latin American History: Lurking in the Shadows by Luis Roniger and Leonardo Senkman (review) Perennial Conspiracy Theory: Reflections on the History of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" by Michael Hagemeister (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1