{"title":"通过整合机器学习模型加强治愈率分析:一项比较研究","authors":"Wisdom Aselisewine, Suvra Pal","doi":"10.1007/s11222-024-10456-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cure rate models have been thoroughly investigated across various domains, encompassing medicine, reliability, and finance. The merging of machine learning (ML) with cure models is emerging as a promising strategy to improve predictive accuracy and gain profound insights into the underlying mechanisms influencing the probability of cure. The current body of literature has explored the benefits of incorporating a single ML algorithm with cure models. However, there is a notable absence of a comprehensive study that compares the performances of various ML algorithms in this context. This paper seeks to address and bridge this gap. Specifically, we focus on the well-known mixture cure model and examine the incorporation of five distinct ML algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and decision trees. To bolster the robustness of our comparison, we also include cure models with logistic and spline-based regression. For parameter estimation, we formulate an expectation maximization algorithm. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted across diverse scenarios to compare various models based on the accuracy and precision of estimates for different quantities of interest, along with the predictive accuracy of cure. The results derived from both the simulation study, as well as the analysis of real cutaneous melanoma data, indicate that the incorporation of ML models into cure model provides a beneficial contribution to the ongoing endeavors aimed at improving the accuracy of cure rate estimation.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":22058,"journal":{"name":"Statistics and Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing cure rate analysis through integration of machine learning models: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Wisdom Aselisewine, Suvra Pal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11222-024-10456-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cure rate models have been thoroughly investigated across various domains, encompassing medicine, reliability, and finance. The merging of machine learning (ML) with cure models is emerging as a promising strategy to improve predictive accuracy and gain profound insights into the underlying mechanisms influencing the probability of cure. The current body of literature has explored the benefits of incorporating a single ML algorithm with cure models. However, there is a notable absence of a comprehensive study that compares the performances of various ML algorithms in this context. This paper seeks to address and bridge this gap. Specifically, we focus on the well-known mixture cure model and examine the incorporation of five distinct ML algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and decision trees. To bolster the robustness of our comparison, we also include cure models with logistic and spline-based regression. For parameter estimation, we formulate an expectation maximization algorithm. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted across diverse scenarios to compare various models based on the accuracy and precision of estimates for different quantities of interest, along with the predictive accuracy of cure. The results derived from both the simulation study, as well as the analysis of real cutaneous melanoma data, indicate that the incorporation of ML models into cure model provides a beneficial contribution to the ongoing endeavors aimed at improving the accuracy of cure rate estimation.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics and Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-024-10456-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-024-10456-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
治愈率模型已在医学、可靠性和金融等多个领域得到深入研究。将机器学习(ML)与治愈模型相结合,正在成为一种有前途的策略,可提高预测准确性,并深入了解影响治愈概率的潜在机制。目前已有大量文献探讨了将单一 ML 算法与治愈模型相结合的益处。然而,在这种情况下比较各种 ML 算法性能的综合研究却明显缺乏。本文试图解决并弥补这一空白。具体来说,我们将重点放在众所周知的混合治愈模型上,并研究了五种不同的 ML 算法:极梯度提升、神经网络、支持向量机、随机森林和决策树。为了增强比较的稳健性,我们还纳入了基于逻辑和样条回归的治愈模型。在参数估计方面,我们采用了期望最大化算法。我们在不同场景下进行了全面的模拟研究,根据不同相关数量的估计准确度和精确度以及治愈预测准确度对各种模型进行了比较。模拟研究和真实皮肤黑色素瘤数据分析得出的结果表明,将 ML 模型纳入治愈模型可为目前旨在提高治愈率估算准确性的工作做出有益贡献。
Enhancing cure rate analysis through integration of machine learning models: a comparative study
Cure rate models have been thoroughly investigated across various domains, encompassing medicine, reliability, and finance. The merging of machine learning (ML) with cure models is emerging as a promising strategy to improve predictive accuracy and gain profound insights into the underlying mechanisms influencing the probability of cure. The current body of literature has explored the benefits of incorporating a single ML algorithm with cure models. However, there is a notable absence of a comprehensive study that compares the performances of various ML algorithms in this context. This paper seeks to address and bridge this gap. Specifically, we focus on the well-known mixture cure model and examine the incorporation of five distinct ML algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and decision trees. To bolster the robustness of our comparison, we also include cure models with logistic and spline-based regression. For parameter estimation, we formulate an expectation maximization algorithm. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted across diverse scenarios to compare various models based on the accuracy and precision of estimates for different quantities of interest, along with the predictive accuracy of cure. The results derived from both the simulation study, as well as the analysis of real cutaneous melanoma data, indicate that the incorporation of ML models into cure model provides a beneficial contribution to the ongoing endeavors aimed at improving the accuracy of cure rate estimation.
期刊介绍:
Statistics and Computing is a bi-monthly refereed journal which publishes papers covering the range of the interface between the statistical and computing sciences.
In particular, it addresses the use of statistical concepts in computing science, for example in machine learning, computer vision and data analytics, as well as the use of computers in data modelling, prediction and analysis. Specific topics which are covered include: techniques for evaluating analytically intractable problems such as bootstrap resampling, Markov chain Monte Carlo, sequential Monte Carlo, approximate Bayesian computation, search and optimization methods, stochastic simulation and Monte Carlo, graphics, computer environments, statistical approaches to software errors, information retrieval, machine learning, statistics of databases and database technology, huge data sets and big data analytics, computer algebra, graphical models, image processing, tomography, inverse problems and uncertainty quantification.
In addition, the journal contains original research reports, authoritative review papers, discussed papers, and occasional special issues on particular topics or carrying proceedings of relevant conferences. Statistics and Computing also publishes book review and software review sections.