对 Gopal Sreenivasan 所著《情感与美德》的评论

IF 0.6 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Analytic Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/phib.12339

Julia Driver

{"title":"对 Gopal Sreenivasan 所著《情感与美德》的评论","authors":"Julia Driver","doi":"10.1111/phib.12339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay provides a critical discussion of Gopal Sreenivasan's integral account of virtue in his book Emotion and Virtue. This discussion focuses on his account of the paradigm virtue of compassion, arguing that the view does not have most of the advantages Sreenivasan suggests it has when compared to competing models of virtue.","PeriodicalId":45646,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Philosophy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on Emotion and Virtue by Gopal Sreenivasan\",\"authors\":\"Julia Driver\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/phib.12339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay provides a critical discussion of Gopal Sreenivasan's integral account of virtue in his book Emotion and Virtue. This discussion focuses on his account of the paradigm virtue of compassion, arguing that the view does not have most of the advantages Sreenivasan suggests it has when compared to competing models of virtue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytic Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytic Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12339\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对戈帕尔-斯里尼瓦桑（Gopal Sreenivasan）在《情感与美德》（Emotion and Virtue）一书中提出的美德整体论进行了批判性讨论。讨论的重点是他对 "同情 "这一典型美德的论述，认为与其他美德模式相比，该观点并不具备斯里尼瓦桑所说的大多数优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Comments on Emotion and Virtue by Gopal Sreenivasan

This essay provides a critical discussion of Gopal Sreenivasan's integral account of virtue in his book Emotion and Virtue. This discussion focuses on his account of the paradigm virtue of compassion, arguing that the view does not have most of the advantages Sreenivasan suggests it has when compared to competing models of virtue.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊