供应链中的共同目标和愿景:以预防为导向的实践与以合规为导向的实践的中介模型

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Journal of Innovation Management Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0995
Charles Luo, Dongli Zhang, Kevin Linderman, John Ni
{"title":"供应链中的共同目标和愿景:以预防为导向的实践与以合规为导向的实践的中介模型","authors":"Charles Luo, Dongli Zhang, Kevin Linderman, John Ni","doi":"10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Manufacturers face increasing demands to address inefficiencies and improve environmental performance across their supply chains. However, there remains a significant gap in empirical research examining how collaboration in the supply chain affects various environmental practices and their consequent impacts on performance. This study aims to address the gap by examining how shared goals and vision drives compliance-oriented and prevention-oriented practices, subsequently affecting environmental performance and operational costs—critical for fostering antifragility and resilience in today’s environment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An empirical study has been performed based on a sample of survey data from 279 manufacturers from fifteen countries and regions. Applying structural equation modeling analysis to the sample dataset, this study examines the mediating role of two distinct types of environmental practices between shared goals and visions and manufacturers’ environmental performance and operational cost.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study delineates distinct pathways through which shared goals and vision affect various types of environmental practices, and consequently lead to different performance outcomes: (1) environmental impact of manufacturing activities depends on the collective efforts of the manufacturers and their supply chain partners; (2) shared goals and vision among supply chain partners facilitates both environmental performance and operational cost through prevention-oriented practice; (3) shared goals and vision in supply chain benefits operational cost performance primarily through prevention-oriented practice, but less likely through compliance-oriented practice.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study reveals two distinct pathways through which the shared goals and vision impact various performance outcomes, providing valuable guidance to businesses aiming to balance operational cost and environmental performance — crucial for resilience in today's turbulent environment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study not only corroborates existing theories of the Natural Resource-Based View and collaborative networks but also provides a detailed depiction of how collaboration across the supply chain promotes a diverse range of environmental practices and yields varied performance outcomes. It offers vital insights for supply chain participants to effectively navigate environmental challenges, enabling them to cultivate resilience and proactively address environmental issues.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared goals and vision in supply chain: a mediation model of prevention-oriented practices and compliance-oriented practices\",\"authors\":\"Charles Luo, Dongli Zhang, Kevin Linderman, John Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Manufacturers face increasing demands to address inefficiencies and improve environmental performance across their supply chains. However, there remains a significant gap in empirical research examining how collaboration in the supply chain affects various environmental practices and their consequent impacts on performance. This study aims to address the gap by examining how shared goals and vision drives compliance-oriented and prevention-oriented practices, subsequently affecting environmental performance and operational costs—critical for fostering antifragility and resilience in today’s environment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>An empirical study has been performed based on a sample of survey data from 279 manufacturers from fifteen countries and regions. Applying structural equation modeling analysis to the sample dataset, this study examines the mediating role of two distinct types of environmental practices between shared goals and visions and manufacturers’ environmental performance and operational cost.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>This study delineates distinct pathways through which shared goals and vision affect various types of environmental practices, and consequently lead to different performance outcomes: (1) environmental impact of manufacturing activities depends on the collective efforts of the manufacturers and their supply chain partners; (2) shared goals and vision among supply chain partners facilitates both environmental performance and operational cost through prevention-oriented practice; (3) shared goals and vision in supply chain benefits operational cost performance primarily through prevention-oriented practice, but less likely through compliance-oriented practice.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This study reveals two distinct pathways through which the shared goals and vision impact various performance outcomes, providing valuable guidance to businesses aiming to balance operational cost and environmental performance — crucial for resilience in today's turbulent environment.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study not only corroborates existing theories of the Natural Resource-Based View and collaborative networks but also provides a detailed depiction of how collaboration across the supply chain promotes a diverse range of environmental practices and yields varied performance outcomes. It offers vital insights for supply chain participants to effectively navigate environmental challenges, enabling them to cultivate resilience and proactively address environmental issues.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Innovation Management\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0995\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2023-0995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的制造商面临着越来越多的要求,需要解决效率低下的问题,并提高整个供应链的环境绩效。然而,在研究供应链中的合作如何影响各种环境实践及其对绩效的影响方面,实证研究仍存在巨大差距。本研究旨在通过研究共同的目标和愿景如何推动以合规为导向和以预防为导向的实践,进而影响环境绩效和运营成本--这对于在当今环境中培养反脆弱性和复原力至关重要--来填补这一空白。设计/方法/方法基于来自 15 个国家和地区的 279 家制造商的抽样调查数据进行了实证研究。通过对样本数据集进行结构方程建模分析,本研究探讨了两种不同类型的环境实践在共同目标和愿景与制造商的环境绩效和运营成本之间的中介作用。研究结果本研究界定了共同目标和愿景影响各类环境实践并进而导致不同绩效结果的不同途径:(1) 制造活动对环境的影响取决于制造商及其供应链合作伙伴的共同努力;(2) 供应链合作伙伴之间的共同目标和愿景通过以预防为导向的实践促进环境绩效和运营成本;(3) 供应链中的共同目标和愿景主要通过以预防为导向的实践使运营成本绩效受益,但较少通过以合规为导向的实践受益。本研究揭示了共同目标和愿景对各种绩效结果产生影响的两种不同途径,为旨在平衡运营成本和环境绩效的企业提供了宝贵的指导--在当今动荡的环境中,这对企业的应变能力至关重要。 本研究不仅证实了基于自然资源的观点和协作网络的现有理论,还详细描述了供应链间的协作如何促进各种环境实践并产生不同的绩效结果。它为供应链参与者有效驾驭环境挑战提供了重要见解,使他们能够培养复原力并积极主动地解决环境问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shared goals and vision in supply chain: a mediation model of prevention-oriented practices and compliance-oriented practices

Purpose

Manufacturers face increasing demands to address inefficiencies and improve environmental performance across their supply chains. However, there remains a significant gap in empirical research examining how collaboration in the supply chain affects various environmental practices and their consequent impacts on performance. This study aims to address the gap by examining how shared goals and vision drives compliance-oriented and prevention-oriented practices, subsequently affecting environmental performance and operational costs—critical for fostering antifragility and resilience in today’s environment.

Design/methodology/approach

An empirical study has been performed based on a sample of survey data from 279 manufacturers from fifteen countries and regions. Applying structural equation modeling analysis to the sample dataset, this study examines the mediating role of two distinct types of environmental practices between shared goals and visions and manufacturers’ environmental performance and operational cost.

Findings

This study delineates distinct pathways through which shared goals and vision affect various types of environmental practices, and consequently lead to different performance outcomes: (1) environmental impact of manufacturing activities depends on the collective efforts of the manufacturers and their supply chain partners; (2) shared goals and vision among supply chain partners facilitates both environmental performance and operational cost through prevention-oriented practice; (3) shared goals and vision in supply chain benefits operational cost performance primarily through prevention-oriented practice, but less likely through compliance-oriented practice.

Practical implications

This study reveals two distinct pathways through which the shared goals and vision impact various performance outcomes, providing valuable guidance to businesses aiming to balance operational cost and environmental performance — crucial for resilience in today's turbulent environment.

Originality/value

This study not only corroborates existing theories of the Natural Resource-Based View and collaborative networks but also provides a detailed depiction of how collaboration across the supply chain promotes a diverse range of environmental practices and yields varied performance outcomes. It offers vital insights for supply chain participants to effectively navigate environmental challenges, enabling them to cultivate resilience and proactively address environmental issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the impact of technological innovation and SMEs resilience: the moderating role of firms' social sustainability orientation Involving lead users in firm’s standardization strategy within action groups: evidence from smart robotics “Every idea made life easier:” A critical discourse analysis of creative employee-driven innovation in the Italian healthcare system How the digital environment moderates disruptive technology and digital entrepreneurship relationship in emerging markets Innovating the bank-firm relationship: a spherical fuzzy approach to SME funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1