药剂师指导的干预对资源有限中心的哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺病患者坚持使用吸入器、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响:一项干预研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.2147/ppa.s460810
Aashish Bhattarai, Rajani Shakya, Durga Bista
{"title":"药剂师指导的干预对资源有限中心的哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺病患者坚持使用吸入器、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响:一项干预研究","authors":"Aashish Bhattarai, Rajani Shakya, Durga Bista","doi":"10.2147/ppa.s460810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory conditions characterized by airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Adherence to prescribed inhaler therapy and correct inhalation technique are essential for effective disease management and optimal disease control. However, non-adherence and incorrect inhalation technique are common challenges faced by patients with asthma and COPD, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased healthcare burden.<br/><strong>Purpose:</strong> To study the impact of a pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation technique, and disease control among patients with asthma and COPD.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> A pre-post interventional design assessed the effects of pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation techniques, and disease control in asthma and COPD patients at Dhulikhel Hospital in Nepal. Inclusion criteria: adult patient clinically diagnosed with asthma or COPD patients of all genders. The intervention comprised counseling patients with aids like videos, and informational leaflets. Impact was measured using checklist method for inhalation technique, the Test of Adherence to Inhaler (TAI) questionnaire for adherence to inhaler, and “Asthma Control Test (ACT)” or “COPD Assessment Test (CAT)” for disease control.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The pharmacist-led intervention significantly increased adherence to inhalers, evidenced by a notable rise in the proportion of patients with good adherence (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.001). Sporadic, deliberate, and unwitting noncompliance pattern also improved significantly after the intervention (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.001, <em>P</em>&lt; 0.001 and <em>P</em>=0.001). Inhalation technique exhibited substantial improvement after intervention (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.001). The analysis indicated significant moderate negative correlations between “TIA” and “CAT” [<em>ρ</em>=− 0.31; P=0.01], and between “inhalation technique score” and “CAT score” [<em>ρ</em>=− 0.31; <em>P</em>=0.01] suggesting that as adherence to inhaler usage and inhalation technique improve, CAT scores tend to decrease, indicating reduced disease impact on the patient.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study shows the potential efficacy of pharmacist-led intervention in enhancing adherence to inhaler, inhalation technique, and disease control in respiratory conditions such as asthma and COPD.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adherence to Inhalers, Inhalation Technique, and Disease Control Among Asthma/COPD Patients in a Resource Limited Center: An Interventional Study\",\"authors\":\"Aashish Bhattarai, Rajani Shakya, Durga Bista\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ppa.s460810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory conditions characterized by airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Adherence to prescribed inhaler therapy and correct inhalation technique are essential for effective disease management and optimal disease control. However, non-adherence and incorrect inhalation technique are common challenges faced by patients with asthma and COPD, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased healthcare burden.<br/><strong>Purpose:</strong> To study the impact of a pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation technique, and disease control among patients with asthma and COPD.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> A pre-post interventional design assessed the effects of pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation techniques, and disease control in asthma and COPD patients at Dhulikhel Hospital in Nepal. Inclusion criteria: adult patient clinically diagnosed with asthma or COPD patients of all genders. The intervention comprised counseling patients with aids like videos, and informational leaflets. Impact was measured using checklist method for inhalation technique, the Test of Adherence to Inhaler (TAI) questionnaire for adherence to inhaler, and “Asthma Control Test (ACT)” or “COPD Assessment Test (CAT)” for disease control.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The pharmacist-led intervention significantly increased adherence to inhalers, evidenced by a notable rise in the proportion of patients with good adherence (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.001). Sporadic, deliberate, and unwitting noncompliance pattern also improved significantly after the intervention (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.001, <em>P</em>&lt; 0.001 and <em>P</em>=0.001). Inhalation technique exhibited substantial improvement after intervention (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.001). The analysis indicated significant moderate negative correlations between “TIA” and “CAT” [<em>ρ</em>=− 0.31; P=0.01], and between “inhalation technique score” and “CAT score” [<em>ρ</em>=− 0.31; <em>P</em>=0.01] suggesting that as adherence to inhaler usage and inhalation technique improve, CAT scores tend to decrease, indicating reduced disease impact on the patient.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study shows the potential efficacy of pharmacist-led intervention in enhancing adherence to inhaler, inhalation technique, and disease control in respiratory conditions such as asthma and COPD.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s460810\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s460810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)是以气流阻塞和呼吸道症状为特征的慢性呼吸道疾病。坚持使用处方吸入器治疗和正确的吸入技术对于有效的疾病管理和最佳的疾病控制至关重要。目的:研究药剂师主导的干预措施对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器治疗依从性、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响:采用前-后干预设计,评估药剂师主导的干预对尼泊尔 Dhulikhel 医院哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者吸入器依从性、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响。纳入标准:临床诊断为哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺病的成年男女患者。干预措施包括利用视频和信息传单等辅助工具为患者提供咨询。使用核对表法测量吸入技术的效果,使用吸入器依从性测试问卷(TAI)测量吸入器的依从性,使用 "哮喘控制测试(ACT)"或 "慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)"测量疾病控制情况:药剂师指导的干预措施明显提高了吸入器的依从性,表现为依从性良好的患者比例明显上升(P< 0.001)。零星、故意和无意的不依从模式在干预后也有明显改善(P< 0.001、P< 0.001 和 P=0.001)。干预后,吸入技术有了很大改善(P< 0.001)。分析表明,"TIA "与 "CAT"[ρ=- 0.31; P=0.01]之间以及 "吸入技术得分 "与 "CAT得分"[ρ=- 0.31; P=0.01]之间存在明显的中度负相关,表明随着吸入器使用的依从性和吸入技术的改善,CAT得分趋于降低,表明疾病对患者的影响减少:这项研究表明,药剂师主导的干预措施在提高哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病等呼吸系统疾病患者吸入器使用的依从性、吸入技术和疾病控制方面具有潜在疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adherence to Inhalers, Inhalation Technique, and Disease Control Among Asthma/COPD Patients in a Resource Limited Center: An Interventional Study
Background: Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory conditions characterized by airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms. Adherence to prescribed inhaler therapy and correct inhalation technique are essential for effective disease management and optimal disease control. However, non-adherence and incorrect inhalation technique are common challenges faced by patients with asthma and COPD, leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased healthcare burden.
Purpose: To study the impact of a pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation technique, and disease control among patients with asthma and COPD.
Patients and Methods: A pre-post interventional design assessed the effects of pharmacist-led intervention on inhaler adherence, inhalation techniques, and disease control in asthma and COPD patients at Dhulikhel Hospital in Nepal. Inclusion criteria: adult patient clinically diagnosed with asthma or COPD patients of all genders. The intervention comprised counseling patients with aids like videos, and informational leaflets. Impact was measured using checklist method for inhalation technique, the Test of Adherence to Inhaler (TAI) questionnaire for adherence to inhaler, and “Asthma Control Test (ACT)” or “COPD Assessment Test (CAT)” for disease control.
Results: The pharmacist-led intervention significantly increased adherence to inhalers, evidenced by a notable rise in the proportion of patients with good adherence (P< 0.001). Sporadic, deliberate, and unwitting noncompliance pattern also improved significantly after the intervention (P< 0.001, P< 0.001 and P=0.001). Inhalation technique exhibited substantial improvement after intervention (P< 0.001). The analysis indicated significant moderate negative correlations between “TIA” and “CAT” [ρ=− 0.31; P=0.01], and between “inhalation technique score” and “CAT score” [ρ=− 0.31; P=0.01] suggesting that as adherence to inhaler usage and inhalation technique improve, CAT scores tend to decrease, indicating reduced disease impact on the patient.
Conclusion: This study shows the potential efficacy of pharmacist-led intervention in enhancing adherence to inhaler, inhalation technique, and disease control in respiratory conditions such as asthma and COPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Public Perceptions of Surgeon Attire in Saudi Arabia. Associations of Social Psychological Factors and OHRQoL in Periodontitis Patients: A Structural Equation Modeling Study. Comparing Patient Satisfaction with Automated Drug Dispensing System and Traditional Drug Dispensing System: A Cross-Sectional Study. Development and Testing of a Multi-Component Intervention to Improve Medication Literacy in Glaucoma Patients. Flu Vaccination Among Patients with Noncommunicable Diseases: A Survey About Awareness, Usage, Gaps and Barriers in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1