Hui-Jing Li, Jason Lin, Sheng-Hsiu Huang, Chih-Wei Lin, Chih-Chieh Chen
{"title":"153 无绳手持吸尘器性能测试","authors":"Hui-Jing Li, Jason Lin, Sheng-Hsiu Huang, Chih-Wei Lin, Chih-Chieh Chen","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxae035.220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cordless handheld vacuum cleaners market is expanding rapidly and is expected to reach $10 billion by 2027, raising concerns about indoor air quality. Despite growing demand, there is limited research into the aerosol emissions from these devices and their impact on respiratory health, which is a current concern for everyone. Our study aimed to investigate particulate matter (PM) emissions from these vacuum cleaners and identify the key factors contributing to such emissions. Two custom-built devices were designed to quantify upstream and downstream PM concentrations and suction pressure with and without filter cartridge and motor exhaust. We tested six popular cordless vacuum cleaner models under different conditions and found that filter cartridge sealing, motor design, and dust load can affect PM emissions. In contrast to previous research, brushless motors (manufacturer claims) do not necessarily emit fewer particles than brushed motors. We also found that some filter cartridges are not airtight and will cause PM concentration to rise significantly, especially under heavy load conditions. While leaking cartridges result in higher suction and clean air delivery rates, we still recommend regulating airtight filter cartridges due to elevated PM emissions. Our findings also suggest the need for regulations controlling motor assembly and design standards, not just motor type. For immediate mitigation, users should ventilate areas and use respiratory protection. Our work is a foundation for understanding the health risks of vacuum cleaner aerosol emissions and informs consumer choices and potential regulatory measures.","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":"240 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"153 Performance testing of cordless handheld vacuum cleaners\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Jing Li, Jason Lin, Sheng-Hsiu Huang, Chih-Wei Lin, Chih-Chieh Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/annweh/wxae035.220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cordless handheld vacuum cleaners market is expanding rapidly and is expected to reach $10 billion by 2027, raising concerns about indoor air quality. Despite growing demand, there is limited research into the aerosol emissions from these devices and their impact on respiratory health, which is a current concern for everyone. Our study aimed to investigate particulate matter (PM) emissions from these vacuum cleaners and identify the key factors contributing to such emissions. Two custom-built devices were designed to quantify upstream and downstream PM concentrations and suction pressure with and without filter cartridge and motor exhaust. We tested six popular cordless vacuum cleaner models under different conditions and found that filter cartridge sealing, motor design, and dust load can affect PM emissions. In contrast to previous research, brushless motors (manufacturer claims) do not necessarily emit fewer particles than brushed motors. We also found that some filter cartridges are not airtight and will cause PM concentration to rise significantly, especially under heavy load conditions. While leaking cartridges result in higher suction and clean air delivery rates, we still recommend regulating airtight filter cartridges due to elevated PM emissions. Our findings also suggest the need for regulations controlling motor assembly and design standards, not just motor type. For immediate mitigation, users should ventilate areas and use respiratory protection. Our work is a foundation for understanding the health risks of vacuum cleaner aerosol emissions and informs consumer choices and potential regulatory measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxae035.220\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxae035.220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
153 Performance testing of cordless handheld vacuum cleaners
The cordless handheld vacuum cleaners market is expanding rapidly and is expected to reach $10 billion by 2027, raising concerns about indoor air quality. Despite growing demand, there is limited research into the aerosol emissions from these devices and their impact on respiratory health, which is a current concern for everyone. Our study aimed to investigate particulate matter (PM) emissions from these vacuum cleaners and identify the key factors contributing to such emissions. Two custom-built devices were designed to quantify upstream and downstream PM concentrations and suction pressure with and without filter cartridge and motor exhaust. We tested six popular cordless vacuum cleaner models under different conditions and found that filter cartridge sealing, motor design, and dust load can affect PM emissions. In contrast to previous research, brushless motors (manufacturer claims) do not necessarily emit fewer particles than brushed motors. We also found that some filter cartridges are not airtight and will cause PM concentration to rise significantly, especially under heavy load conditions. While leaking cartridges result in higher suction and clean air delivery rates, we still recommend regulating airtight filter cartridges due to elevated PM emissions. Our findings also suggest the need for regulations controlling motor assembly and design standards, not just motor type. For immediate mitigation, users should ventilate areas and use respiratory protection. Our work is a foundation for understanding the health risks of vacuum cleaner aerosol emissions and informs consumer choices and potential regulatory measures.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Annals of Work Exposures and Health is dedicated to presenting advances in exposure science supporting the recognition, quantification, and control of exposures at work, and epidemiological studies on their effects on human health and well-being. A key question we apply to submission is, "Is this paper going to help readers better understand, quantify, and control conditions at work that adversely or positively affect health and well-being?"
We are interested in high quality scientific research addressing:
the quantification of work exposures, including chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical, and psychosocial, and the elements of work organization giving rise to such exposures;
the relationship between these exposures and the acute and chronic health consequences for those exposed and their families and communities;
populations at special risk of work-related exposures including women, under-represented minorities, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups such as temporary, contingent and informal sector workers;
the effectiveness of interventions addressing exposure and risk including production technologies, work process engineering, and personal protective systems;
policies and management approaches to reduce risk and improve health and well-being among workers, their families or communities;
methodologies and mechanisms that underlie the quantification and/or control of exposure and risk.
There is heavy pressure on space in the journal, and the above interests mean that we do not usually publish papers that simply report local conditions without generalizable results. We are also unlikely to publish reports on human health and well-being without information on the work exposure characteristics giving rise to the effects. We particularly welcome contributions from scientists based in, or addressing conditions in, developing economies that fall within the above scope.