收割还是不收割?管理强度不会影响 Paludiculture Phalaris Arundinacea 的温室气体平衡

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wetlands Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s13157-024-01830-7
Claudia Kalla Nielsen, Weier Liu, Michael Koppelgaard, Poul Erik Laerke
{"title":"收割还是不收割?管理强度不会影响 Paludiculture Phalaris Arundinacea 的温室气体平衡","authors":"Claudia Kalla Nielsen, Weier Liu, Michael Koppelgaard, Poul Erik Laerke","doi":"10.1007/s13157-024-01830-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cultivation of flooding-tolerant grasses on wet or rewetted peatlands is a priority in climate change mitigation, balancing the trade-off between atmospheric decarbonisation and biomass production. However, effects of management intensities on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the global warming potential (GWP) are widely unknown. This study assessed whether intensities of two and five annual harvest occurrences at fertilisation rates of 200 kg nitrogen ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup> affects GHG exchange dynamics compared to a ‘nature scenario’ with neither harvest nor fertilisation. Fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), using opaque and transparent chambers, were measured on a wet fen peatland with a mean water table depth of -10 cm below soil surface. Overall, no treatment effect was found on biomass yields and GHG emissions. Annual cumulative CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were low, ranging between 0.3 and 0.5 t CO<sub>2</sub>-C eq ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>. Contrary to this, emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O were high, ranging between 1.1 and 1.5 t CO<sub>2</sub>-C eq ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>. For magnitudes of CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, soil moisture conditions and electrical peat properties were critical proxies. Atmospheric uptake of CO<sub>2</sub> by net ecosystem exchange was higher for the treatments with management. However, this benefit was offset by the export of carbon in biomass compared to the treatment without management. In conclusion, the results highlighted a near-equal GWP in the range of 10.5–11.5 t CO<sub>2</sub>-C eq t ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup> for all treatments irrespectively of management. In a climate context, a restoration scenario but also intensive paludiculture practices were equal land-use options.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Harvest or not to Harvest: Management Intensity did not Affect Greenhouse Gas Balances of Phalaris Arundinacea Paludiculture\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Kalla Nielsen, Weier Liu, Michael Koppelgaard, Poul Erik Laerke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13157-024-01830-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cultivation of flooding-tolerant grasses on wet or rewetted peatlands is a priority in climate change mitigation, balancing the trade-off between atmospheric decarbonisation and biomass production. However, effects of management intensities on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the global warming potential (GWP) are widely unknown. This study assessed whether intensities of two and five annual harvest occurrences at fertilisation rates of 200 kg nitrogen ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup> affects GHG exchange dynamics compared to a ‘nature scenario’ with neither harvest nor fertilisation. Fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), using opaque and transparent chambers, were measured on a wet fen peatland with a mean water table depth of -10 cm below soil surface. Overall, no treatment effect was found on biomass yields and GHG emissions. Annual cumulative CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were low, ranging between 0.3 and 0.5 t CO<sub>2</sub>-C eq ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>. Contrary to this, emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O were high, ranging between 1.1 and 1.5 t CO<sub>2</sub>-C eq ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup>. For magnitudes of CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, soil moisture conditions and electrical peat properties were critical proxies. Atmospheric uptake of CO<sub>2</sub> by net ecosystem exchange was higher for the treatments with management. However, this benefit was offset by the export of carbon in biomass compared to the treatment without management. In conclusion, the results highlighted a near-equal GWP in the range of 10.5–11.5 t CO<sub>2</sub>-C eq t ha<sup>− 1</sup> yr<sup>− 1</sup> for all treatments irrespectively of management. In a climate context, a restoration scenario but also intensive paludiculture practices were equal land-use options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wetlands\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wetlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01830-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01830-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在潮湿或复湿的泥炭地上种植耐涝草是减缓气候变化的一个优先事项,可在大气脱碳和生物质生产之间取得平衡。然而,管理强度对温室气体(GHG)排放和全球升温潜能值(GWP)的影响尚不为人所知。本研究评估了与既不收获也不施肥的 "自然情景 "相比,每年两次和五次的收获强度(施肥量为 200 千克氮/公顷-1 年-1)是否会影响温室气体交换动态。在平均水位深度为土壤表层下 -10 厘米的湿润沼泽泥炭地上,使用不透明和透明箱测量了二氧化碳 (CO2)、甲烷 (CH4) 和氧化亚氮 (N2O) 的通量。总体而言,生物量产量和温室气体排放量没有受到处理效果的影响。每年累积的甲烷排放量很低,在 0.3 至 0.5 吨二氧化碳当量公顷-1 年-1 之间。与此相反,N2O 的排放量较高,介于 1.1 至 1.5 吨 CO2-C eq ha- 1 yr- 1 之间。对于甲烷和一氧化二氮的排放量而言,土壤湿度条件和泥炭电特性是关键的代用指标。在有管理的处理中,通过生态系统净交换对大气中二氧化碳的吸收量更高。然而,与未进行管理的处理相比,生物质中碳的输出抵消了这一优势。总之,研究结果表明,无论管理与否,所有处理的全球升温潜能值几乎相等,都在 10.5-11.5 吨 CO2-C 当量 t ha- 1 yr- 1 之间。从气候角度看,恢复方案和密集型棕榈栽培方法是相同的土地利用方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To Harvest or not to Harvest: Management Intensity did not Affect Greenhouse Gas Balances of Phalaris Arundinacea Paludiculture

The cultivation of flooding-tolerant grasses on wet or rewetted peatlands is a priority in climate change mitigation, balancing the trade-off between atmospheric decarbonisation and biomass production. However, effects of management intensities on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the global warming potential (GWP) are widely unknown. This study assessed whether intensities of two and five annual harvest occurrences at fertilisation rates of 200 kg nitrogen ha− 1 yr− 1 affects GHG exchange dynamics compared to a ‘nature scenario’ with neither harvest nor fertilisation. Fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), using opaque and transparent chambers, were measured on a wet fen peatland with a mean water table depth of -10 cm below soil surface. Overall, no treatment effect was found on biomass yields and GHG emissions. Annual cumulative CH4 emissions were low, ranging between 0.3 and 0.5 t CO2-C eq ha− 1 yr− 1. Contrary to this, emissions of N2O were high, ranging between 1.1 and 1.5 t CO2-C eq ha− 1 yr− 1. For magnitudes of CH4 and N2O, soil moisture conditions and electrical peat properties were critical proxies. Atmospheric uptake of CO2 by net ecosystem exchange was higher for the treatments with management. However, this benefit was offset by the export of carbon in biomass compared to the treatment without management. In conclusion, the results highlighted a near-equal GWP in the range of 10.5–11.5 t CO2-C eq t ha− 1 yr− 1 for all treatments irrespectively of management. In a climate context, a restoration scenario but also intensive paludiculture practices were equal land-use options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Change Characteristics of Wetlands in Hefei and their Driving Factors Along the Urban–Rural Gradient Which Natural Wetland Characteristics Could be Used in Creating Temporary Wetlands? Assessing Present and Future Potential Distributions of Sagittaria macrophylla Zucc. and Sagittaria latifolia Willd. in Mexico under Various Climate Models and Timeframes Are Plant Communities of Roadside Stormwater Ponds Similar to those Found in Natural Wetlands? Forecasting Wetland Transformation to Dust Source by Employing CA-Markov Model and Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Shadgan International Wetland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1