人工智能对学术研究和出版的影响

Brady Lund, Manika Lamba, Sang Hoo Oh
{"title":"人工智能对学术研究和出版的影响","authors":"Brady Lund, Manika Lamba, Sang Hoo Oh","doi":"arxiv-2406.06009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT, have\nsignificantly impacted academic writing and publishing through their ability to\ngenerate content at levels comparable to or surpassing human writers. Through a\nreview of recent interdisciplinary literature, this paper examines ethical\nconsiderations surrounding the integration of AI into academia, focusing on the\npotential for this technology to be used for scholarly misconduct and necessary\noversight when using it for writing, editing, and reviewing of scholarly\npapers. The findings highlight the need for collaborative approaches to AI\nusage among publishers, editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure that this\ntechnology is used ethically and productively.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing\",\"authors\":\"Brady Lund, Manika Lamba, Sang Hoo Oh\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2406.06009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT, have\\nsignificantly impacted academic writing and publishing through their ability to\\ngenerate content at levels comparable to or surpassing human writers. Through a\\nreview of recent interdisciplinary literature, this paper examines ethical\\nconsiderations surrounding the integration of AI into academia, focusing on the\\npotential for this technology to be used for scholarly misconduct and necessary\\noversight when using it for writing, editing, and reviewing of scholarly\\npapers. The findings highlight the need for collaborative approaches to AI\\nusage among publishers, editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure that this\\ntechnology is used ethically and productively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.06009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.06009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

像 ChatGPT 这样的人工智能(AI)生成技术能够以媲美或超越人类作者的水平生成内容,从而对学术写作和出版产生了重大影响。本文通过对近期跨学科文献的研究,探讨了将人工智能融入学术界所涉及的伦理问题,重点关注该技术用于学术不端行为的可能性,以及在使用该技术进行学术论文写作、编辑和评审时的必要监督。研究结果突出表明,出版商、编辑、审稿人和作者之间需要采取合作的方式来使用人工智能,以确保该技术的使用符合道德规范并富有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT, have significantly impacted academic writing and publishing through their ability to generate content at levels comparable to or surpassing human writers. Through a review of recent interdisciplinary literature, this paper examines ethical considerations surrounding the integration of AI into academia, focusing on the potential for this technology to be used for scholarly misconduct and necessary oversight when using it for writing, editing, and reviewing of scholarly papers. The findings highlight the need for collaborative approaches to AI usage among publishers, editors, reviewers, and authors to ensure that this technology is used ethically and productively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1