通过国际法制定宪法:自由贸易协定的本土化

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS European Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1093/ejil/chae027
Christian Riffel
{"title":"通过国际法制定宪法:自由贸易协定的本土化","authors":"Christian Riffel","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chae027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Zealand’s free trade agreements (FTAs) with the European Union and the United Kingdom break new ground by elevating Indigenous customary protocols to a vector in the regulation of international trade. While in the past the focus has been on securing policy space to protect Indigenous rights, this has shifted: Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, have entered the trade arena, and with them their protocols and customs, as a means of enshrining participation rights for Māori, as a touchstone for international cooperation, as a benchmark for reviewing FTAs and as a method of addressing problems ranging from environmental degradation to unsustainable fisheries. Māori are not just another stakeholder; they have a seat at the table, and this article will canvass to what extent. Other countries with an Indigenous population will develop their own paths to better integrate Indigenous peoples in their foreign trade policies. New Zealand presents one notable example.","PeriodicalId":47727,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Law","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutional Law-making by International Law: The Indigenization of Free Trade Agreements\",\"authors\":\"Christian Riffel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejil/chae027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New Zealand’s free trade agreements (FTAs) with the European Union and the United Kingdom break new ground by elevating Indigenous customary protocols to a vector in the regulation of international trade. While in the past the focus has been on securing policy space to protect Indigenous rights, this has shifted: Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, have entered the trade arena, and with them their protocols and customs, as a means of enshrining participation rights for Māori, as a touchstone for international cooperation, as a benchmark for reviewing FTAs and as a method of addressing problems ranging from environmental degradation to unsustainable fisheries. Māori are not just another stakeholder; they have a seat at the table, and this article will canvass to what extent. Other countries with an Indigenous population will develop their own paths to better integrate Indigenous peoples in their foreign trade policies. New Zealand presents one notable example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新西兰与欧洲联盟和联合王国的自由贸易协定(FTAs)开辟了新天地,将土著习惯议定书提升为国际贸易监管的一个载体。虽然过去的重点是确保保护土著权利的政策空间,但这一重点已经发生了转变:毛利人--新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的土著人--已经进入贸易领域,他们的协议和习俗也随之进入贸易领域,成为规定毛利人参与权的手段,成为国际合作的试金石,成为审查自由贸易协定的基准,成为解决从环境退化到不可持续的渔业等各种问题的方法。毛利人不仅仅是另一个利益相关者,他们在谈判桌上也有一席之地,本文将探讨他们的参与程度。其他拥有原住民的国家也将探索自己的道路,更好地将原住民纳入外贸政策。新西兰就是一个明显的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constitutional Law-making by International Law: The Indigenization of Free Trade Agreements
New Zealand’s free trade agreements (FTAs) with the European Union and the United Kingdom break new ground by elevating Indigenous customary protocols to a vector in the regulation of international trade. While in the past the focus has been on securing policy space to protect Indigenous rights, this has shifted: Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, have entered the trade arena, and with them their protocols and customs, as a means of enshrining participation rights for Māori, as a touchstone for international cooperation, as a benchmark for reviewing FTAs and as a method of addressing problems ranging from environmental degradation to unsustainable fisheries. Māori are not just another stakeholder; they have a seat at the table, and this article will canvass to what extent. Other countries with an Indigenous population will develop their own paths to better integrate Indigenous peoples in their foreign trade policies. New Zealand presents one notable example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The European Journal of International Law is firmly established as one of the world"s leading journals in its field. With its distinctive combination of theoretical and practical approaches to the issues of international law, the journal offers readers a unique opportunity to stay in touch with the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area. Each issue of the EJIL provides a forum for the exploration of the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of international law as well as for up-to-date analysis of topical issues. Additionally, it is the only journal to provide systematic coverage of the relationship between international law and the law of the European Union and its Member States.
期刊最新文献
The Progressive Development of International Law on the Return of Stolen Assets: Mapping the Paths Forward A Deeper Understanding of the Constitutional Status of Māori and Their Rights Required: A Reply to Christian Riffel Constitutional Law-making by International Law: The Indigenization of Free Trade Agreements Revisiting Röling and Cassese’s Appraisal of the Tokyo Tribunal Is Imitation Really Flattery? The UK’s Trade Continuity Agreements: A Reply to Joris Larik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1