网络效应下的代币销售设计

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Naval Research Logistics Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1002/nav.22206
Zhao Liu, Xiaoqiang Cai, Fasheng Xu, Lianmin Zhang
{"title":"网络效应下的代币销售设计","authors":"Zhao Liu, Xiaoqiang Cai, Fasheng Xu, Lianmin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nav.22206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the use of initial coin offerings (ICOs) as a means of fundraising for companies through the issuance of blockchain‐based tokens. Specifically, we investigate how a company can implement ICOs and issue tokens supported by its products while taking into account the presence of network effects. We examine several aspects of ICOs, including the impacts of network effect on the company's optimal token sales design, such as the optimal token issuance price, the ICO cap (which refers to the number of tokens to be issued), and the amount of funds raised. We also consider the cases of deterministic and uncertain network effects, the impacts of limited speculators purchasing tokens during the ICO period, the comparison between ICOs and traditional bank financing, and the impact of ICO cost. The research unfolds in five key parts. Firstly, leveraging a baseline model, we derive equilibrium outcomes and the optimal token sales design, discerning the impact of deterministic and uncertain network effects. Notably, network effect uncertainty consistently benefits companies, ensuring profit resilience despite potential challenges, although in the face of such uncertainty, the ICO company may decrease the raised fund. Secondly, we investigate the consequences of a limited number of speculators in the ICO landscape, finding that adjustments on the token sales design are not required under low expected network effect. Thirdly, a comparative study between ICOs and bank financing reveals distinctive advantages of ICOs. ICOs prove capable of decreasing profit volatility while maintaining an equivalent profit compared to traditional bank financing. This insight offers valuable guidance for companies seeking optimal financing methods aligned with their risk preferences. Lastly, the impact of ICO cost on outcomes and token sales design is scrutinized. Contrary to expectations, ICO cost does not uniformly lead to an increase in the ICO cap, underscoring the nuanced relationship between costs and fundraising strategies.","PeriodicalId":49772,"journal":{"name":"Naval Research Logistics","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Token sales design under network effect\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Liu, Xiaoqiang Cai, Fasheng Xu, Lianmin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nav.22206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the use of initial coin offerings (ICOs) as a means of fundraising for companies through the issuance of blockchain‐based tokens. Specifically, we investigate how a company can implement ICOs and issue tokens supported by its products while taking into account the presence of network effects. We examine several aspects of ICOs, including the impacts of network effect on the company's optimal token sales design, such as the optimal token issuance price, the ICO cap (which refers to the number of tokens to be issued), and the amount of funds raised. We also consider the cases of deterministic and uncertain network effects, the impacts of limited speculators purchasing tokens during the ICO period, the comparison between ICOs and traditional bank financing, and the impact of ICO cost. The research unfolds in five key parts. Firstly, leveraging a baseline model, we derive equilibrium outcomes and the optimal token sales design, discerning the impact of deterministic and uncertain network effects. Notably, network effect uncertainty consistently benefits companies, ensuring profit resilience despite potential challenges, although in the face of such uncertainty, the ICO company may decrease the raised fund. Secondly, we investigate the consequences of a limited number of speculators in the ICO landscape, finding that adjustments on the token sales design are not required under low expected network effect. Thirdly, a comparative study between ICOs and bank financing reveals distinctive advantages of ICOs. ICOs prove capable of decreasing profit volatility while maintaining an equivalent profit compared to traditional bank financing. This insight offers valuable guidance for companies seeking optimal financing methods aligned with their risk preferences. Lastly, the impact of ICO cost on outcomes and token sales design is scrutinized. Contrary to expectations, ICO cost does not uniformly lead to an increase in the ICO cap, underscoring the nuanced relationship between costs and fundraising strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naval Research Logistics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naval Research Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naval Research Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了首次代币发行(ICO)作为公司通过发行基于区块链的代币进行筹资的一种手段。具体来说,我们研究了公司如何在考虑到网络效应存在的情况下实施 ICO 并发行由其产品支持的代币。我们研究了 ICO 的几个方面,包括网络效应对公司最优代币销售设计的影响,如最优代币发行价格、ICO 上限(指发行的代币数量)和募集资金额。我们还考虑了确定性和不确定性网络效应的情况、ICO 期间有限投机者购买代币的影响、ICO 与传统银行融资的比较以及 ICO 成本的影响。研究分为五个关键部分。首先,利用基线模型,我们推导出均衡结果和最佳代币销售设计,分辨出确定性和不确定性网络效应的影响。值得注意的是,网络效应的不确定性始终有利于公司,尽管存在潜在挑战,但仍能确保利润弹性,不过面对这种不确定性,ICO 公司可能会减少募集资金。其次,我们研究了 ICO 环境中投机者数量有限的后果,发现在低预期网络效应下,无需调整代币销售设计。第三,ICO 与银行融资的比较研究揭示了 ICO 的独特优势。事实证明,与传统银行融资相比,ICO 既能降低利润波动性,又能保持同等利润。这一见解为企业寻求与其风险偏好相一致的最佳融资方式提供了宝贵的指导。最后,我们仔细研究了 ICO 成本对结果和代币销售设计的影响。与预期相反,ICO 成本并不会一致导致 ICO 上限的增加,这突出表明了成本与筹款策略之间的微妙关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Token sales design under network effect
This paper explores the use of initial coin offerings (ICOs) as a means of fundraising for companies through the issuance of blockchain‐based tokens. Specifically, we investigate how a company can implement ICOs and issue tokens supported by its products while taking into account the presence of network effects. We examine several aspects of ICOs, including the impacts of network effect on the company's optimal token sales design, such as the optimal token issuance price, the ICO cap (which refers to the number of tokens to be issued), and the amount of funds raised. We also consider the cases of deterministic and uncertain network effects, the impacts of limited speculators purchasing tokens during the ICO period, the comparison between ICOs and traditional bank financing, and the impact of ICO cost. The research unfolds in five key parts. Firstly, leveraging a baseline model, we derive equilibrium outcomes and the optimal token sales design, discerning the impact of deterministic and uncertain network effects. Notably, network effect uncertainty consistently benefits companies, ensuring profit resilience despite potential challenges, although in the face of such uncertainty, the ICO company may decrease the raised fund. Secondly, we investigate the consequences of a limited number of speculators in the ICO landscape, finding that adjustments on the token sales design are not required under low expected network effect. Thirdly, a comparative study between ICOs and bank financing reveals distinctive advantages of ICOs. ICOs prove capable of decreasing profit volatility while maintaining an equivalent profit compared to traditional bank financing. This insight offers valuable guidance for companies seeking optimal financing methods aligned with their risk preferences. Lastly, the impact of ICO cost on outcomes and token sales design is scrutinized. Contrary to expectations, ICO cost does not uniformly lead to an increase in the ICO cap, underscoring the nuanced relationship between costs and fundraising strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Naval Research Logistics
Naval Research Logistics 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Submissions that are most appropriate for NRL are papers addressing modeling and analysis of problems motivated by real-world applications; major methodological advances in operations research and applied statistics; and expository or survey pieces of lasting value. Areas represented include (but are not limited to) probability, statistics, simulation, optimization, game theory, quality, scheduling, reliability, maintenance, supply chain, decision analysis, and combat models. Special issues devoted to a single topic are published occasionally, and proposals for special issues are welcomed by the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Partial information sharing in supply chains with ARMA demand Efficient online estimation and remaining useful life prediction based on the inverse Gaussian process Double‐sided queues and their applications to vaccine inventory management Optimal condition‐based parameter learning and mission abort decisions Single machine scheduling with the total weighted late work and rejection cost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1