在不稳定岩体中建造矿石通道的最佳方法--带灌浆的提升钻孔分析--案例研究

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s42461-024-01023-0
Cluber Rojas, Angelina Anani, Eduardo Cordova, Wedam Nyaaba, Edward Wellman, Sefiu O. Adewuyi
{"title":"在不稳定岩体中建造矿石通道的最佳方法--带灌浆的提升钻孔分析--案例研究","authors":"Cluber Rojas, Angelina Anani, Eduardo Cordova, Wedam Nyaaba, Edward Wellman, Sefiu O. Adewuyi","doi":"10.1007/s42461-024-01023-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The construction of ore pass systems in underground mines is a high-risk activity, especially in an environment with incompetent rock mass. This study aims to investigate the optimal method for ore pass construction in incompetent rock masses. We evaluated the conventional and raise boring (RB) methods based on safety, efficiency, excavation control, and ground support for ore pass construction. We also performed a stability analysis using analytical Q-raise (<i>Q</i><sub>R</sub> method) and kinematic analysis methods for ore pass construction with a Raise Borer before and after grout injection of the rock mass. As a case study, an ore pass (diameter, 3 m; depth, 100 m) within an incompetent rock mass was considered to gain further insight. The rock mass was characterized according to the classification methods Q Barton, rock quality designation (RQD), rock mass rating (RMR), and geological strength index (GSI). The grout intensity number (GIN) method of grout injection is used. The safety factor (&lt;1.075) obtained before injection was lower than the acceptance criteria in all sections of the rock mass. However, grout injection before Raise Borer excavation resulted in a rock mass safety factor greater than 1.5. Using RB without pre-grouting in the case study indicated that the maximum unsupported diameter (MUSD) of the ore pass was less than the required 3 m. On the contrary, an MUSD of the rock mass post-grouting was equal to or larger than 3 m at all depths.</p>","PeriodicalId":18588,"journal":{"name":"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Raise Boring with Grouting as an Optimal Method for Ore Pass Construction in Incompetent Rock Mass—A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Cluber Rojas, Angelina Anani, Eduardo Cordova, Wedam Nyaaba, Edward Wellman, Sefiu O. Adewuyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42461-024-01023-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The construction of ore pass systems in underground mines is a high-risk activity, especially in an environment with incompetent rock mass. This study aims to investigate the optimal method for ore pass construction in incompetent rock masses. We evaluated the conventional and raise boring (RB) methods based on safety, efficiency, excavation control, and ground support for ore pass construction. We also performed a stability analysis using analytical Q-raise (<i>Q</i><sub>R</sub> method) and kinematic analysis methods for ore pass construction with a Raise Borer before and after grout injection of the rock mass. As a case study, an ore pass (diameter, 3 m; depth, 100 m) within an incompetent rock mass was considered to gain further insight. The rock mass was characterized according to the classification methods Q Barton, rock quality designation (RQD), rock mass rating (RMR), and geological strength index (GSI). The grout intensity number (GIN) method of grout injection is used. The safety factor (&lt;1.075) obtained before injection was lower than the acceptance criteria in all sections of the rock mass. However, grout injection before Raise Borer excavation resulted in a rock mass safety factor greater than 1.5. Using RB without pre-grouting in the case study indicated that the maximum unsupported diameter (MUSD) of the ore pass was less than the required 3 m. On the contrary, an MUSD of the rock mass post-grouting was equal to or larger than 3 m at all depths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-01023-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-01023-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在地下矿井中建造矿道系统是一项高风险活动,尤其是在岩体不稳定的环境中。本研究旨在探讨在不稳定岩体中建造矿道的最佳方法。我们从安全、效率、挖掘控制和地面支撑等方面对矿石巷道施工的常规方法和提升钻孔(RB)方法进行了评估。我们还使用分析 Q-raise(QR 法)和运动学分析方法,对岩体注浆前后使用提升钻孔机施工矿石通道进行了稳定性分析。作为一项案例研究,我们考虑了在不合格岩体中的矿石通道(直径 3 米,深度 100 米),以获得更深入的了解。根据 Q Barton、岩石质量名称 (RQD)、岩体等级 (RMR) 和地质强度指数 (GSI) 等分类方法对岩体进行了表征。注浆采用注浆强度数(GIN)法。注浆前获得的安全系数(<1.075)低于岩体所有地段的验收标准。然而,在 Raise Borer 挖掘之前注入注浆,岩体安全系数大于 1.5。在案例研究中,在未进行预注浆的情况下使用 RB,矿石通道的最大无支撑直径(MUSD)小于要求的 3 米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Raise Boring with Grouting as an Optimal Method for Ore Pass Construction in Incompetent Rock Mass—A Case Study

The construction of ore pass systems in underground mines is a high-risk activity, especially in an environment with incompetent rock mass. This study aims to investigate the optimal method for ore pass construction in incompetent rock masses. We evaluated the conventional and raise boring (RB) methods based on safety, efficiency, excavation control, and ground support for ore pass construction. We also performed a stability analysis using analytical Q-raise (QR method) and kinematic analysis methods for ore pass construction with a Raise Borer before and after grout injection of the rock mass. As a case study, an ore pass (diameter, 3 m; depth, 100 m) within an incompetent rock mass was considered to gain further insight. The rock mass was characterized according to the classification methods Q Barton, rock quality designation (RQD), rock mass rating (RMR), and geological strength index (GSI). The grout intensity number (GIN) method of grout injection is used. The safety factor (<1.075) obtained before injection was lower than the acceptance criteria in all sections of the rock mass. However, grout injection before Raise Borer excavation resulted in a rock mass safety factor greater than 1.5. Using RB without pre-grouting in the case study indicated that the maximum unsupported diameter (MUSD) of the ore pass was less than the required 3 m. On the contrary, an MUSD of the rock mass post-grouting was equal to or larger than 3 m at all depths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: The aim of this international peer-reviewed journal of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (SME) is to provide a broad-based forum for the exchange of real-world and theoretical knowledge from academia, government and industry that is pertinent to mining, mineral/metallurgical processing, exploration and other fields served by the Society. The journal publishes high-quality original research publications, in-depth special review articles, reviews of state-of-the-art and innovative technologies and industry methodologies, communications of work of topical and emerging interest, and other works that enhance understanding on both the fundamental and practical levels.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Backbreak in Surface Production Blasting Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling and 3-Dimensional Nearfield Vibration Modeling Improving Feldspar Flotation Using CTAB As Amine Collector (Part Two) Research on Vibrating Screen Screening Technology and Method Based on DEM: a Review Slope Stability Analysis of Opencast Mine Dump using the Limit Equilibrium Method—a Case Study Spatial Clustering of Primary Geochemical Halos Using Unsupervised Machine Learning in Sari Gunay Gold Deposit, Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1