血流限制阻力训练能增强远程力量转移吗?系统回顾与荟萃分析

Pm & R Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13200
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Irene Crespo, Marcos Quintana‐Cepedal, María Fernández‐del Valle, Miguel del Valle, Hugo Olmedillas
{"title":"血流限制阻力训练能增强远程力量转移吗?系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Irene Crespo, Marcos Quintana‐Cepedal, María Fernández‐del Valle, Miguel del Valle, Hugo Olmedillas","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesThis systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).Literature SurveyA search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.MethodologyStudies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.SynthesisEight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.ConclusionsBFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST.","PeriodicalId":20287,"journal":{"name":"Pm & R","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, Irene Crespo, Marcos Quintana‐Cepedal, María Fernández‐del Valle, Miguel del Valle, Hugo Olmedillas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesThis systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).Literature SurveyA search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.MethodologyStudies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.SynthesisEight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.ConclusionsBFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pm & R\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pm & R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pm & R","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究血流限制阻力训练(BFR-RT)对未训练肢体力量增长(远程力量转移 [RST])的影响。方法纳入了评估 BFR-RT 后 RST 现象并测量肌肉力量的研究。采用随机效应模型对标准化均值差异(SMDs)进行元分析,以确定 BFR-RT 对 RST 的影响。综述本系统综述共纳入 8 项研究,其中 6 项参与了元分析。与 RT 相比,BFR-RT 没有增强 RST(SMD 0.27,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.02 至 0.56;P = .07)。结论 根据荟萃分析,在相同负荷下,BFR-RT 与传统 RT 相比并不能增强 RST。因此,不建议在 RST 中使用 BFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis
ObjectivesThis systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effect of blood flow restriction resistance training (BFR‐RT) on strength gains in untrained limbs (remote strength transfer [RST]).Literature SurveyA search for studies was performed using six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect) up to February 2024.MethodologyStudies that assessed the RST phenomenon following BFR‐RT and measured muscle strength were included. Meta‐analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) were performed using a random‐effects model to determine the effect of BFR‐RT on RST.SynthesisEight studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were involved in the meta‐analyses. BFR‐RT was not found to enhance RST in comparison with RT (SMD 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.02 to 0.56; p = .07). These findings did not vary when the comparison was examined in upper limbs or measured using an isometric contraction.ConclusionsBFR‐RT does not enhance RST in comparison with traditional RT at the same load according to the meta‐analyses. Therefore, the usage of BFR is not recommended for RST.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Academy News – September 2024 PM&R Spanish Translated Abstracts Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinical experiences: A narrative review of curricula and educational interventions Can blood‐flow restriction resistance training enhance remote strength transfer? A systematic review with meta‐analysis Creating and confirming observable professional activities (OPAs): A pilot study evaluating the feasibility of OPAs on a residency inpatient spinal cord injury rotation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1