多重生物识别身份验证系统的对抗性攻击漏洞

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Expert Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1111/exsy.13655
MyeongHoe Lee, JunHo Yoon, Chang Choi
{"title":"多重生物识别身份验证系统的对抗性攻击漏洞","authors":"MyeongHoe Lee,&nbsp;JunHo Yoon,&nbsp;Chang Choi","doi":"10.1111/exsy.13655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on multi-biometric authentication systems using multiple biometric modalities to defend against adversarial attacks is actively being pursued. These systems authenticate users by combining two or more biometric modalities using score or feature-level fusion. However, research on adversarial attacks and defences against each biometric modality within these authentication systems has not been actively conducted. In this study, we constructed a multi-biometric authentication system using fingerprint, palmprint, and iris information from CASIA-BIT by employing score and feature-level fusion. We verified the system's vulnerability by deploying adversarial attacks on single and multiple biometric modalities based on the FGSM, with epsilon values ranging from 0 to 0.5. The experimental results show that when the epsilon value is 0.5, the accuracy of the multi-biometric authentication system against adversarial attacks on the palmprint and iris information decreases from 0.995 to 0.018 and 0.003, respectively, and the f1-score decreases from 0.995 to 0.007 and 0.000, respectively, demonstrating susceptibility to adversarial attacks. In the case of fingerprint data, however, the accuracy and f1-score decreased from 0.995 to 0.731 and from 0.995 to 0.741, respectively, indicating resilience against adversarial attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adversarial attack vulnerability for multi-biometric authentication system\",\"authors\":\"MyeongHoe Lee,&nbsp;JunHo Yoon,&nbsp;Chang Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/exsy.13655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research on multi-biometric authentication systems using multiple biometric modalities to defend against adversarial attacks is actively being pursued. These systems authenticate users by combining two or more biometric modalities using score or feature-level fusion. However, research on adversarial attacks and defences against each biometric modality within these authentication systems has not been actively conducted. In this study, we constructed a multi-biometric authentication system using fingerprint, palmprint, and iris information from CASIA-BIT by employing score and feature-level fusion. We verified the system's vulnerability by deploying adversarial attacks on single and multiple biometric modalities based on the FGSM, with epsilon values ranging from 0 to 0.5. The experimental results show that when the epsilon value is 0.5, the accuracy of the multi-biometric authentication system against adversarial attacks on the palmprint and iris information decreases from 0.995 to 0.018 and 0.003, respectively, and the f1-score decreases from 0.995 to 0.007 and 0.000, respectively, demonstrating susceptibility to adversarial attacks. In the case of fingerprint data, however, the accuracy and f1-score decreased from 0.995 to 0.731 and from 0.995 to 0.741, respectively, indicating resilience against adversarial attacks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.13655\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.13655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前正在积极研究使用多种生物识别模式的多重生物识别身份验证系统,以抵御对抗性攻击。这些系统通过分数或特征级融合将两种或多种生物识别模式结合起来,对用户进行身份验证。然而,针对这些身份验证系统中每种生物识别模式的对抗性攻击和防御的研究还没有积极开展。在本研究中,我们利用 CASIA-BIT 的指纹、掌纹和虹膜信息,通过分数和特征级融合构建了一个多生物特征认证系统。我们在 FGSM 的基础上对单一和多种生物识别模式部署了对抗性攻击,验证了系统的脆弱性,ε值在 0 到 0.5 之间。实验结果表明,当 epsilon 值为 0.5 时,多重生物识别身份验证系统抵御对抗性攻击的准确率分别从 0.995 降至 0.018 和 0.003,f1-score 分别从 0.995 降至 0.007 和 0.000,这表明系统容易受到对抗性攻击。而指纹数据的准确度和 f1 分数则分别从 0.995 降至 0.731 和 0.995 降至 0.741,这表明指纹数据具有抵御恶意攻击的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adversarial attack vulnerability for multi-biometric authentication system

Research on multi-biometric authentication systems using multiple biometric modalities to defend against adversarial attacks is actively being pursued. These systems authenticate users by combining two or more biometric modalities using score or feature-level fusion. However, research on adversarial attacks and defences against each biometric modality within these authentication systems has not been actively conducted. In this study, we constructed a multi-biometric authentication system using fingerprint, palmprint, and iris information from CASIA-BIT by employing score and feature-level fusion. We verified the system's vulnerability by deploying adversarial attacks on single and multiple biometric modalities based on the FGSM, with epsilon values ranging from 0 to 0.5. The experimental results show that when the epsilon value is 0.5, the accuracy of the multi-biometric authentication system against adversarial attacks on the palmprint and iris information decreases from 0.995 to 0.018 and 0.003, respectively, and the f1-score decreases from 0.995 to 0.007 and 0.000, respectively, demonstrating susceptibility to adversarial attacks. In the case of fingerprint data, however, the accuracy and f1-score decreased from 0.995 to 0.731 and from 0.995 to 0.741, respectively, indicating resilience against adversarial attacks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive survey on deep learning‐based intrusion detection systems in Internet of Things (IoT) MTFDN: An image copy‐move forgery detection method based on multi‐task learning STP‐CNN: Selection of transfer parameters in convolutional neural networks Label distribution learning for compound facial expression recognition in‐the‐wild: A comparative study Federated learning‐driven dual blockchain for data sharing and reputation management in Internet of medical things
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1