Simon Bazin, Virginie Diouloufet, Ange Molina, Tiphaine Peroux, Jose M. Montoya, Simon Blanchet, Eric Edeline, Stéphan Jacquet, Serena Rasconi, Stéphanie Fayolle, Marina Campana, Thalia Zambeaux, Camille Leclerc, Rémy Lassus, Julie Morla, Martin Daufresne, Arnaud Sentis
{"title":"人工增温对群落的直接影响强于其通过减少体重产生的间接影响","authors":"Simon Bazin, Virginie Diouloufet, Ange Molina, Tiphaine Peroux, Jose M. Montoya, Simon Blanchet, Eric Edeline, Stéphan Jacquet, Serena Rasconi, Stéphanie Fayolle, Marina Campana, Thalia Zambeaux, Camille Leclerc, Rémy Lassus, Julie Morla, Martin Daufresne, Arnaud Sentis","doi":"10.1111/oik.10561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theory predicts that morphological and bioenergetic constraints due to temperature‐induced body size reduction can modulate the direct effects of warming on biotic interactions, with consequent effects on trophic cascades and biomass distribution. However, these theoretical predictions have rarely been tested empirically. Our aim was to distinguish the indirect effects of warming‐induced body size reductions from the direct effects of warming on community structure. We conducted a mesocosm experiment manipulating factorially 1) body size reduction in the medaka fish <jats:italic>Oryzias latipes</jats:italic> using two populations raised for several generations under contrasted climate conditions and 2) warming (+4°C), to test their independent and interactive effects on the structure of prey and primary resource communities, the predator–prey biomass ratio and the biomass size spectra. We further dissected the effects of seasonal temperature variation from the effects of constant artificial warming. We found that the indirect effects of warming (i.e. fish body size reduction) on composition and structure of communities as well as their biomass size spectra were of marginal amplitude compared to the direct effects of seasonal temperature variation and constant warming. There were no changes in community composition in response to fish body size reduction or constant warming. However, the density of macroinvertebrates and zooplankton were maximal at intermediate seasonal water temperatures and lower in constantly‐heated mesocosms. Contrastingly, phytoplankton was not strongly affected by seasonal temperature or warming, but rather responded to grazing effects of zooplankton. Finally, we found a reduction in predator–prey biomass ratio under warming and at the warmest seasonal temperature, inducing a steeper slope of the biomass size spectra under increasing seasonal (but not constant) temperature. We conclude that the direct effects of climate change on freshwater communities are stronger than its indirect effects mediated by body mass reduction.","PeriodicalId":19496,"journal":{"name":"Oikos","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct effect of artificial warming on communities is stronger than its indirect effect through body mass reduction\",\"authors\":\"Simon Bazin, Virginie Diouloufet, Ange Molina, Tiphaine Peroux, Jose M. Montoya, Simon Blanchet, Eric Edeline, Stéphan Jacquet, Serena Rasconi, Stéphanie Fayolle, Marina Campana, Thalia Zambeaux, Camille Leclerc, Rémy Lassus, Julie Morla, Martin Daufresne, Arnaud Sentis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/oik.10561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theory predicts that morphological and bioenergetic constraints due to temperature‐induced body size reduction can modulate the direct effects of warming on biotic interactions, with consequent effects on trophic cascades and biomass distribution. However, these theoretical predictions have rarely been tested empirically. Our aim was to distinguish the indirect effects of warming‐induced body size reductions from the direct effects of warming on community structure. We conducted a mesocosm experiment manipulating factorially 1) body size reduction in the medaka fish <jats:italic>Oryzias latipes</jats:italic> using two populations raised for several generations under contrasted climate conditions and 2) warming (+4°C), to test their independent and interactive effects on the structure of prey and primary resource communities, the predator–prey biomass ratio and the biomass size spectra. We further dissected the effects of seasonal temperature variation from the effects of constant artificial warming. We found that the indirect effects of warming (i.e. fish body size reduction) on composition and structure of communities as well as their biomass size spectra were of marginal amplitude compared to the direct effects of seasonal temperature variation and constant warming. There were no changes in community composition in response to fish body size reduction or constant warming. However, the density of macroinvertebrates and zooplankton were maximal at intermediate seasonal water temperatures and lower in constantly‐heated mesocosms. Contrastingly, phytoplankton was not strongly affected by seasonal temperature or warming, but rather responded to grazing effects of zooplankton. Finally, we found a reduction in predator–prey biomass ratio under warming and at the warmest seasonal temperature, inducing a steeper slope of the biomass size spectra under increasing seasonal (but not constant) temperature. We conclude that the direct effects of climate change on freshwater communities are stronger than its indirect effects mediated by body mass reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oikos\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oikos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10561\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oikos","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct effect of artificial warming on communities is stronger than its indirect effect through body mass reduction
Theory predicts that morphological and bioenergetic constraints due to temperature‐induced body size reduction can modulate the direct effects of warming on biotic interactions, with consequent effects on trophic cascades and biomass distribution. However, these theoretical predictions have rarely been tested empirically. Our aim was to distinguish the indirect effects of warming‐induced body size reductions from the direct effects of warming on community structure. We conducted a mesocosm experiment manipulating factorially 1) body size reduction in the medaka fish Oryzias latipes using two populations raised for several generations under contrasted climate conditions and 2) warming (+4°C), to test their independent and interactive effects on the structure of prey and primary resource communities, the predator–prey biomass ratio and the biomass size spectra. We further dissected the effects of seasonal temperature variation from the effects of constant artificial warming. We found that the indirect effects of warming (i.e. fish body size reduction) on composition and structure of communities as well as their biomass size spectra were of marginal amplitude compared to the direct effects of seasonal temperature variation and constant warming. There were no changes in community composition in response to fish body size reduction or constant warming. However, the density of macroinvertebrates and zooplankton were maximal at intermediate seasonal water temperatures and lower in constantly‐heated mesocosms. Contrastingly, phytoplankton was not strongly affected by seasonal temperature or warming, but rather responded to grazing effects of zooplankton. Finally, we found a reduction in predator–prey biomass ratio under warming and at the warmest seasonal temperature, inducing a steeper slope of the biomass size spectra under increasing seasonal (but not constant) temperature. We conclude that the direct effects of climate change on freshwater communities are stronger than its indirect effects mediated by body mass reduction.
期刊介绍:
Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology, defined as organism-environment interactions at various spatiotemporal scales, so including macroecology and evolutionary ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers can contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical empirical results, and "synthesis" can include developing new theory, tests of general hypotheses, or bringing together established or emerging areas of ecology. Confirming or extending the established literature, by for example showing results that are novel for a new taxon, or purely applied research, is given low priority.