{"title":"凝固过程中的过冷和裂纹","authors":"Soumyadeep Dasgupta, Sindo Kou","doi":"10.1007/s11661-024-07486-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How the solid fraction <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub> increases with decreasing temperature <i>T</i> during solidification, <i>i.e</i>., the <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) of an alloy, can play a critical role in its susceptibility to cracking during solidification as demonstrated by various models of solidification cracking. In the present study the classic analytical modeling of microsegregation during rapid solidification was used to calculate <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) using Al–Cu alloys as an example. The present study showed significant undercooling can occur during fast cooling and affect <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) significantly. For the purpose of illustration, |d<i>T</i>/d(<i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>)<sup>1/2</sup>| near (<i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>)<sup>1/2</sup> = 1 was used in the present study as a simple index for the susceptibility to solidification cracking. The <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) calculated by any solidification model (<i>e.g</i>., the present analytical model or a phase-field model with undercooling, or the Scheil–Gulliver model without undercooling) can be used to calculate the curve of <i>T</i> <i>vs</i> (<i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>)<sup>1/2</sup> and hence the index. The present study showed undercooling can increase the index and hence the cracking susceptibility significantly. It can also change the composition most susceptible to solidification cracking.</p>","PeriodicalId":18504,"journal":{"name":"Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undercooling and Cracking During Solidification\",\"authors\":\"Soumyadeep Dasgupta, Sindo Kou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11661-024-07486-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>How the solid fraction <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub> increases with decreasing temperature <i>T</i> during solidification, <i>i.e</i>., the <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) of an alloy, can play a critical role in its susceptibility to cracking during solidification as demonstrated by various models of solidification cracking. In the present study the classic analytical modeling of microsegregation during rapid solidification was used to calculate <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) using Al–Cu alloys as an example. The present study showed significant undercooling can occur during fast cooling and affect <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) significantly. For the purpose of illustration, |d<i>T</i>/d(<i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>)<sup>1/2</sup>| near (<i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>)<sup>1/2</sup> = 1 was used in the present study as a simple index for the susceptibility to solidification cracking. The <i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>(<i>T</i>) calculated by any solidification model (<i>e.g</i>., the present analytical model or a phase-field model with undercooling, or the Scheil–Gulliver model without undercooling) can be used to calculate the curve of <i>T</i> <i>vs</i> (<i>f</i><sub><i>S</i></sub>)<sup>1/2</sup> and hence the index. The present study showed undercooling can increase the index and hence the cracking susceptibility significantly. It can also change the composition most susceptible to solidification cracking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-024-07486-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-024-07486-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How the solid fraction fS increases with decreasing temperature T during solidification, i.e., the fS(T) of an alloy, can play a critical role in its susceptibility to cracking during solidification as demonstrated by various models of solidification cracking. In the present study the classic analytical modeling of microsegregation during rapid solidification was used to calculate fS(T) using Al–Cu alloys as an example. The present study showed significant undercooling can occur during fast cooling and affect fS(T) significantly. For the purpose of illustration, |dT/d(fS)1/2| near (fS)1/2 = 1 was used in the present study as a simple index for the susceptibility to solidification cracking. The fS(T) calculated by any solidification model (e.g., the present analytical model or a phase-field model with undercooling, or the Scheil–Gulliver model without undercooling) can be used to calculate the curve of Tvs (fS)1/2 and hence the index. The present study showed undercooling can increase the index and hence the cracking susceptibility significantly. It can also change the composition most susceptible to solidification cracking.