用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术的全厚腓肠肌肌腱移植物移除后的供体部位发病率:4年随访。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55095/achot2024/023
D Ertilav, E Ertilav, G N Dirlik, K Barut
{"title":"用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术的全厚腓肠肌肌腱移植物移除后的供体部位发病率:4年随访。","authors":"D Ertilav, E Ertilav, G N Dirlik, K Barut","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PUSPOSE OF THE STUDY. Many studies have investigated the efficacy of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and donor site morbidity has not been adequately studied.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using PLT were included. Ankle strengths of the patients evaluated with an analog dynamometer. Ankle range of motion (ROM) was measured with a smart phone inclonometer application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the postoperative ankle strength(eversion, plantar flexion) in the donor area and the preoperative period (p=0.6 and p=0.7, respectively) and contralateral healthy side (p=0.6, p=0.6, respectively). Ankle ROM angles (dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, eversion, inversion) were significantly lower in the post-operative period compared to the preoperative period and contralateral healthy side (p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative AOFAS scores (p=0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although PLT can affect ROM angles, it is a promising alternative for ACL reconstructions without causing functional morbidity.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>peroneus longus tendon, autograft, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, donor site morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor Site Morbidity after Removal of FullThickness Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: 4-Year Follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"D Ertilav, E Ertilav, G N Dirlik, K Barut\",\"doi\":\"10.55095/achot2024/023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PUSPOSE OF THE STUDY. Many studies have investigated the efficacy of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and donor site morbidity has not been adequately studied.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using PLT were included. Ankle strengths of the patients evaluated with an analog dynamometer. Ankle range of motion (ROM) was measured with a smart phone inclonometer application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the postoperative ankle strength(eversion, plantar flexion) in the donor area and the preoperative period (p=0.6 and p=0.7, respectively) and contralateral healthy side (p=0.6, p=0.6, respectively). Ankle ROM angles (dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, eversion, inversion) were significantly lower in the post-operative period compared to the preoperative period and contralateral healthy side (p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative AOFAS scores (p=0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although PLT can affect ROM angles, it is a promising alternative for ACL reconstructions without causing functional morbidity.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>peroneus longus tendon, autograft, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, donor site morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的。许多研究都探讨了腓骨长肌腱(PLT)在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中的疗效,但对供体部位的发病率尚未进行充分研究:纳入了 50 名使用腓骨长肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的患者。使用模拟测力计评估患者的踝关节力量。使用智能手机倾斜仪应用软件测量踝关节活动范围(ROM):供体区术后踝关节力量(外翻、跖屈)与术前(P=0.6 和 P=0.7)和对侧健侧(P=0.6 和 P=0.6)无明显差异。与术前和对侧健侧相比,术后的踝关节ROM角度(背屈、跖屈、外翻、内翻)明显降低(p结论:虽然PLT会影响ROM角度,但它是前交叉韧带重建的一种很有前途的替代方法,不会造成功能性发病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Donor Site Morbidity after Removal of FullThickness Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: 4-Year Follow-up.

PUSPOSE OF THE STUDY. Many studies have investigated the efficacy of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and donor site morbidity has not been adequately studied.

Material and methods: Fifty patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using PLT were included. Ankle strengths of the patients evaluated with an analog dynamometer. Ankle range of motion (ROM) was measured with a smart phone inclonometer application.

Results: There was no significant difference between the postoperative ankle strength(eversion, plantar flexion) in the donor area and the preoperative period (p=0.6 and p=0.7, respectively) and contralateral healthy side (p=0.6, p=0.6, respectively). Ankle ROM angles (dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, eversion, inversion) were significantly lower in the post-operative period compared to the preoperative period and contralateral healthy side (p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative AOFAS scores (p=0.2).

Conclusions: Although PLT can affect ROM angles, it is a promising alternative for ACL reconstructions without causing functional morbidity.

Key words: peroneus longus tendon, autograft, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, donor site morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Reformation for Comparison of Foraminal Cross-Sectional Dimension in Patients Who Have Undergone Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion [Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech., 2024;91:103-108] [Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic Indications]. [Sagittal Profi le of the Spine in Patients after Lumbar Stabilisation Surgeries]. [Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the AMIS Method: Surgical Technique, Suitability of This Method for Obese Patients, Evaluation of the Study Population]. Management of Length Unstable Femur Fractures in Children by Flexible Intramedullary Nails: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1