利用机器学习测量质量,评估结肠镜检查技能:概念验证和初步验证。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2333-8138
Matthew Wittbrodt, Matthew Klug, Mozziyar Etemadi, Anthony Yang, John E Pandolfino, Rajesh N Keswani
{"title":"利用机器学习测量质量,评估结肠镜检查技能:概念验证和初步验证。","authors":"Matthew Wittbrodt, Matthew Klug, Mozziyar Etemadi, Anthony Yang, John E Pandolfino, Rajesh N Keswani","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-8138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). <b>Methods</b> Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed: HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. <b>Results</b> The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( <i>P</i> = 0.99) and WT ( <i>P</i> = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( <i>P</i> = 0.85) WT time. <b>Conclusions</b> An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E849-E853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Wittbrodt, Matthew Klug, Mozziyar Etemadi, Anthony Yang, John E Pandolfino, Rajesh N Keswani\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2333-8138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). <b>Methods</b> Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed: HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. <b>Results</b> The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( <i>P</i> = 0.99) and WT ( <i>P</i> = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( <i>P</i> = 0.85) WT time. <b>Conclusions</b> An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 7\",\"pages\":\"E849-E853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221895/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2333-8138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2333-8138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 低质量的结肠镜检查会增加患癌风险,但测量质量仍具有挑战性。我们利用机器学习(ML)开发了一种自动、交互式结肠镜检查质量评估(AI-CQ)。方法 根据质量指南,为人工智能开发选择的指标包括插入时间(IT)、退出时间(WT)、息肉检出率(PDR)和每次结肠镜检查的息肉数(PPC)。此外,还开发了两个新的指标:HQ-WT(图像清晰的撤镜时间)和 WT-PT(撤镜时间减去息肉切除时间)。该模型在无标记的结肠镜图像上使用自监督视觉转换器进行预训练,然后在另一个互斥的结肠镜图像数据集上进行微调,以进行多标记分类。除了原始视频外,还通过网络应用程序向临床医生展示了视频预测和度量计算的时间轴。第二家医院使用 50 例结肠镜检查对该模型进行了外部验证。结果 AI-CQ 识别盲肠插管的准确率为 88%。人工测量与 AI-CQ 测量的 IT ( P = 0.99) 和 WT ( P = 0.99) 高度相关,中位差分别为 1.5 秒和 4.5 秒。AI-CQ PDR 与手动 PDR 没有明显差异(47.6% 对 45.5%,P = 0.66)。95.2%的结肠镜检查能正确识别反折,100%的结肠镜检查能正确识别右侧结肠的数量。HQ-WT为45.9%,与WT时间显著相关(P = 0.85)。结论 结肠镜检查技能的交互式人工智能评估可以自动评估质量。我们建议利用该工具快速识别和培训需要补救的医疗服务提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation.

Background and study aims Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). Methods Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed: HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. Results The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( P = 0.99) and WT ( P = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, P = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( P = 0.85) WT time. Conclusions An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1