罕见事件的历史控制数据:问题、年代模式及其与毒理学评估的相关性。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105673
Felix M. Kluxen
{"title":"罕见事件的历史控制数据:问题、年代模式及其与毒理学评估的相关性。","authors":"Felix M. Kluxen","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Historical control data (HCD) give context for a measurement by providing a biological reference frame. HCD are used in the evaluation of toxicological bioassays for quality and performance control, informal statistical false discovery rate mitigation, and to estimate the biological relevance of observed potentially adverse findings. The current commentary shortly highlights 5 points that should be considered when working with HCD of rare events: 1) HCD database (HCDB) size, 2) the issue of rare events, 3) potential chronological patterns, 4) using point estimates to summarize HCD and 5) independence from treatment bias, i.e., HCD are mostly informative for primary toxicity. It is argued to use exploratory data analysis and to apply ad hoc time windows for assessment based on an HCDB that is as large as possible to monitor for potential structure and systemic bias in the data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 105673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical control data of rare events: Issues, chronological patterns and their relevance for toxicological evaluations\",\"authors\":\"Felix M. Kluxen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Historical control data (HCD) give context for a measurement by providing a biological reference frame. HCD are used in the evaluation of toxicological bioassays for quality and performance control, informal statistical false discovery rate mitigation, and to estimate the biological relevance of observed potentially adverse findings. The current commentary shortly highlights 5 points that should be considered when working with HCD of rare events: 1) HCD database (HCDB) size, 2) the issue of rare events, 3) potential chronological patterns, 4) using point estimates to summarize HCD and 5) independence from treatment bias, i.e., HCD are mostly informative for primary toxicity. It is argued to use exploratory data analysis and to apply ad hoc time windows for assessment based on an HCDB that is as large as possible to monitor for potential structure and systemic bias in the data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024001144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史控制数据(HCD)通过提供生物参考框架,为测量提供背景信息。历史对照数据可用于毒理学生物测定的质量和性能控制评估、非正式统计错误发现率的缓解,以及估计观察到的潜在不良结果的生物学相关性。本评论简要强调了在处理罕见事件 HCD 时应考虑的 5 点:1) HCD 数据库 (HCDB) 的大小;2) 罕见事件的问题;3) 潜在的年代模式;4) 使用点估计来总结 HCD;5) 不受治疗偏倚的影响,即 HCD 对原发性毒性的信息量最大。有观点认为,应使用探索性数据分析,并在尽可能大的 HCDB 基础上应用临时时间窗进行评估,以监测数据中的潜在结构和系统偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Historical control data of rare events: Issues, chronological patterns and their relevance for toxicological evaluations

Historical control data (HCD) give context for a measurement by providing a biological reference frame. HCD are used in the evaluation of toxicological bioassays for quality and performance control, informal statistical false discovery rate mitigation, and to estimate the biological relevance of observed potentially adverse findings. The current commentary shortly highlights 5 points that should be considered when working with HCD of rare events: 1) HCD database (HCDB) size, 2) the issue of rare events, 3) potential chronological patterns, 4) using point estimates to summarize HCD and 5) independence from treatment bias, i.e., HCD are mostly informative for primary toxicity. It is argued to use exploratory data analysis and to apply ad hoc time windows for assessment based on an HCDB that is as large as possible to monitor for potential structure and systemic bias in the data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
期刊最新文献
Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods Accurate regulatory classification of chemical respiratory allergens: The case for robust characterisation of causation Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances Editorial Board Toxicological evaluation of vanadium and derivation of a parenteral tolerable intake value for medical devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1