利用自然语言处理技术在医学生成绩仪表板中实现叙事反馈的可视化。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005800
Christina Maimone, Brigid M Dolan, Marianne M Green, Sandra M Sanguino, Celia Laird O'Brien
{"title":"利用自然语言处理技术在医学生成绩仪表板中实现叙事反馈的可视化。","authors":"Christina Maimone, Brigid M Dolan, Marianne M Green, Sandra M Sanguino, Celia Laird O'Brien","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Clinical competency committees rely on narrative feedback for important insight into learner performance, but reviewing comments can be time-consuming. Techniques such as natural language processing (NLP) could create efficiencies in narrative feedback review. In this study, the authors explored whether using NLP to create a visual dashboard of narrative feedback to preclerkship medical students would improve the competency review efficiency.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Preclerkship competency review data collected at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine from 2014 to 2021 were used to identify relevant features of narrative data associated with review outcome (ready or not ready) and draft visual summary reports of the findings. A user needs analysis was held with experienced reviewers to better understand work processes in December 2019. Dashboards were designed based on this input to help reviewers efficiently navigate large amounts of narrative data. The dashboards displayed the model's prediction of the review outcome along with visualizations of how narratives in a student's portfolio compared with previous students' narratives. Excerpts of the most relevant comments were also provided. Six faculty reviewers who comprised the competency committee in spring 2023 were surveyed on the dashboard's utility.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Reviewers found the predictive component of the dashboard most useful. Only 1 of 6 reviewers (17%) agreed that the dashboard improved process efficiency. However, 3 (50%) thought the visuals made them more confident in decisions about competence, and 3 (50%) thought they would use the visual summaries for future reviews. The outcomes highlight limitations of visualizing and summarizing narrative feedback in a comprehensive assessment system.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Future work will explore how to optimize the dashboards to meet reviewer needs. Ongoing advancements in large language models may facilitate these efforts. Opportunities to collaborate with other institutions to apply the model to an external context will also be sought.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Natural Language Processing to Visualize Narrative Feedback in a Medical Student Performance Dashboard.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Maimone, Brigid M Dolan, Marianne M Green, Sandra M Sanguino, Celia Laird O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Problem: </strong>Clinical competency committees rely on narrative feedback for important insight into learner performance, but reviewing comments can be time-consuming. Techniques such as natural language processing (NLP) could create efficiencies in narrative feedback review. In this study, the authors explored whether using NLP to create a visual dashboard of narrative feedback to preclerkship medical students would improve the competency review efficiency.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Preclerkship competency review data collected at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine from 2014 to 2021 were used to identify relevant features of narrative data associated with review outcome (ready or not ready) and draft visual summary reports of the findings. A user needs analysis was held with experienced reviewers to better understand work processes in December 2019. Dashboards were designed based on this input to help reviewers efficiently navigate large amounts of narrative data. The dashboards displayed the model's prediction of the review outcome along with visualizations of how narratives in a student's portfolio compared with previous students' narratives. Excerpts of the most relevant comments were also provided. Six faculty reviewers who comprised the competency committee in spring 2023 were surveyed on the dashboard's utility.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Reviewers found the predictive component of the dashboard most useful. Only 1 of 6 reviewers (17%) agreed that the dashboard improved process efficiency. However, 3 (50%) thought the visuals made them more confident in decisions about competence, and 3 (50%) thought they would use the visual summaries for future reviews. The outcomes highlight limitations of visualizing and summarizing narrative feedback in a comprehensive assessment system.</p><p><strong>Next steps: </strong>Future work will explore how to optimize the dashboards to meet reviewer needs. Ongoing advancements in large language models may facilitate these efforts. Opportunities to collaborate with other institutions to apply the model to an external context will also be sought.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005800\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005800","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:临床能力委员会依靠叙述式反馈来深入了解学员的表现,但审查评论意见可能非常耗时。自然语言处理(NLP)等技术可以提高反馈意见审核的效率。在本研究中,作者探讨了使用 NLP 创建实习前医学生叙述性反馈的可视化仪表板是否会提高能力审查效率:方法:作者利用从 2014 年到 2021 年在西北大学范伯格医学院收集的实习前能力审查数据,确定了与审查结果(准备就绪或尚未准备就绪)相关的叙述性数据特征,并起草了审查结果的可视化总结报告。2019 年 12 月,与经验丰富的审稿人进行了用户需求分析,以更好地了解工作流程。在此基础上设计了仪表盘,以帮助审查员高效浏览大量叙述性数据。仪表板显示了模型对审核结果的预测,以及学生作品集中的叙述与之前学生叙述的可视化比较。此外,还提供了最相关的评论摘录。2023 年春季,组成能力委员会的六位教师评审员接受了关于仪表板实用性的调查:结果:评审人员认为仪表板的预测部分最有用。6 位评审员中只有 1 位(17%)认为仪表板提高了流程效率。不过,有 3 人(50%)认为可视化使他们在决定是否胜任时更有信心,有 3 人(50%)认为他们会在今后的评审中使用可视化摘要。这些结果凸显了在综合评估系统中对叙述性反馈进行可视化和总结的局限性:今后的工作将探索如何优化仪表板,以满足评审者的需求。大语言模型的不断进步可能会促进这些工作。我们还将寻求与其他机构合作的机会,将该模型应用到外部环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Natural Language Processing to Visualize Narrative Feedback in a Medical Student Performance Dashboard.

Problem: Clinical competency committees rely on narrative feedback for important insight into learner performance, but reviewing comments can be time-consuming. Techniques such as natural language processing (NLP) could create efficiencies in narrative feedback review. In this study, the authors explored whether using NLP to create a visual dashboard of narrative feedback to preclerkship medical students would improve the competency review efficiency.

Approach: Preclerkship competency review data collected at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine from 2014 to 2021 were used to identify relevant features of narrative data associated with review outcome (ready or not ready) and draft visual summary reports of the findings. A user needs analysis was held with experienced reviewers to better understand work processes in December 2019. Dashboards were designed based on this input to help reviewers efficiently navigate large amounts of narrative data. The dashboards displayed the model's prediction of the review outcome along with visualizations of how narratives in a student's portfolio compared with previous students' narratives. Excerpts of the most relevant comments were also provided. Six faculty reviewers who comprised the competency committee in spring 2023 were surveyed on the dashboard's utility.

Outcomes: Reviewers found the predictive component of the dashboard most useful. Only 1 of 6 reviewers (17%) agreed that the dashboard improved process efficiency. However, 3 (50%) thought the visuals made them more confident in decisions about competence, and 3 (50%) thought they would use the visual summaries for future reviews. The outcomes highlight limitations of visualizing and summarizing narrative feedback in a comprehensive assessment system.

Next steps: Future work will explore how to optimize the dashboards to meet reviewer needs. Ongoing advancements in large language models may facilitate these efforts. Opportunities to collaborate with other institutions to apply the model to an external context will also be sought.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
U.S. Medical School Graduates' Placement in Graduate Medical Education: A National Study. Holistic Review in Applicant Selection: A Scoping Review. Sense of Belonging Among Medical Students, Residents, and Fellows: Associations With Burnout, Recruitment Retention, and Learning Environment. A Dedicated Graduate Certificate in Health Equity: A Novel Approach to Increase the Future Physician Capacity to Address Health Inequities. Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1