亚裔美国人在上皮性卵巢癌诊断、治疗和生存方面的亚裔差异和趋势。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2024.2359387
Lijuan Da, Yelena Tarasenko, Chen Chen
{"title":"亚裔美国人在上皮性卵巢癌诊断、治疗和生存方面的亚裔差异和趋势。","authors":"Lijuan Da, Yelena Tarasenko, Chen Chen","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2024.2359387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies on ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis, treatment and survival across disaggregated Asian sub-ethnic groups are sparse. Few studies have also conducted trend analyses of these outcomes within and across Asian groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using logistic, Cox, and Joinpoint regression analyses of the 2000-2018 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we examined disparities and trends in OC advanced stage diagnosis, receipt of treatments and the 5-year cause-specific survival across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 6491 OC patients across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups (mean [SD] age, 57.29 [13.90] years). There were 1583(24.39%) Filipino, 1183(18.23%) Chinese, and 761(11.72%) Asian Indian or Pakistani (AIP) patients. The majority (52.49%) were diagnosed with OC with at an advanced stage. AIP were more likely to have advanced stage diagnosis than other subgroups (ORs, 95%CIs: 0.77, 0.62-0.96 [Filipino]; 0.76, 0.60-0.95 [Chinese]; 0.71, 0.54-0.94 [Japanese]; 0.74, 0.56-0.98 [Vietnamese] and 0.66, 0.53-0.83 [Other Asians]). The Filipinos were least likely to receive surgery but most likely to undergo chemotherapy. Japanese patients had the worst 5-year OC cause-specific survival (50.29%, 95%CI: 46.20%-54.74%). Based on the aggregated analyses, there was a significantly decreased trend in advanced-stage diagnosis and an increased trend in receipt of chemotherapy. Trends in OC outcomes for several subethnicities differed from those observed in aggregated analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort study of 6491 patients, OC diagnosis, treatment, survival, and trends differed across Asian American ethnic subgroups. Such differences must be considered in future research and interventions to ensure all Asian American subethnicities equally benefit from the advancements in OC care and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"685-702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asian American sub-ethnic disparities and trends in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis, treatment and survival.\",\"authors\":\"Lijuan Da, Yelena Tarasenko, Chen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13557858.2024.2359387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies on ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis, treatment and survival across disaggregated Asian sub-ethnic groups are sparse. Few studies have also conducted trend analyses of these outcomes within and across Asian groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using logistic, Cox, and Joinpoint regression analyses of the 2000-2018 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we examined disparities and trends in OC advanced stage diagnosis, receipt of treatments and the 5-year cause-specific survival across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 6491 OC patients across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups (mean [SD] age, 57.29 [13.90] years). There were 1583(24.39%) Filipino, 1183(18.23%) Chinese, and 761(11.72%) Asian Indian or Pakistani (AIP) patients. The majority (52.49%) were diagnosed with OC with at an advanced stage. AIP were more likely to have advanced stage diagnosis than other subgroups (ORs, 95%CIs: 0.77, 0.62-0.96 [Filipino]; 0.76, 0.60-0.95 [Chinese]; 0.71, 0.54-0.94 [Japanese]; 0.74, 0.56-0.98 [Vietnamese] and 0.66, 0.53-0.83 [Other Asians]). The Filipinos were least likely to receive surgery but most likely to undergo chemotherapy. Japanese patients had the worst 5-year OC cause-specific survival (50.29%, 95%CI: 46.20%-54.74%). Based on the aggregated analyses, there was a significantly decreased trend in advanced-stage diagnosis and an increased trend in receipt of chemotherapy. Trends in OC outcomes for several subethnicities differed from those observed in aggregated analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort study of 6491 patients, OC diagnosis, treatment, survival, and trends differed across Asian American ethnic subgroups. Such differences must be considered in future research and interventions to ensure all Asian American subethnicities equally benefit from the advancements in OC care and control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"685-702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2359387\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2024.2359387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有关亚裔亚种族群体卵巢癌(OC)诊断、治疗和存活率的研究很少。很少有研究对这些结果在亚裔群体内部和之间进行趋势分析:通过对 2000-2018 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据进行逻辑、Cox 和 Joinpoint 回归分析,我们研究了七个亚裔群体在 OC 晚期诊断、接受治疗和 5 年特定病因生存率方面的差异和趋势:七个亚裔群体中共有 6491 名卵巢癌患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 57.29 [13.90] 岁)。其中有 1583 名(24.39%)菲律宾人、1183 名(18.23%)中国人和 761 名(11.72%)亚裔印度人或巴基斯坦人(AIP)。大多数患者(52.49%)被诊断为晚期卵巢癌。与其他亚群相比,亚裔印巴人更有可能被诊断为晚期(ORs,95%CIs:0.77,0.62-0.96 [菲律宾人];0.76,0.60-0.95 [中国人];0.71,0.54-0.94 [日本人];0.74,0.56-0.98 [越南人]和 0.66,0.53-0.83 [其他亚洲人])。菲律宾人接受手术的可能性最小,但接受化疗的可能性最大。日本患者的 5 年 OC 病因特异性生存率最差(50.29%,95%CI:46.20%-54.74%)。根据汇总分析,晚期诊断率呈明显下降趋势,接受化疗率呈上升趋势。几个亚种族的 OC 结果趋势与汇总分析中观察到的结果不同:在这项对 6491 名患者进行的队列研究中,不同亚裔美国人的 OC 诊断、治疗、存活率和趋势均存在差异。在未来的研究和干预中必须考虑到这些差异,以确保所有亚裔美国人都能平等地受益于OC治疗和控制的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asian American sub-ethnic disparities and trends in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis, treatment and survival.

Objectives: Studies on ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis, treatment and survival across disaggregated Asian sub-ethnic groups are sparse. Few studies have also conducted trend analyses of these outcomes within and across Asian groups.

Methods: Using logistic, Cox, and Joinpoint regression analyses of the 2000-2018 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we examined disparities and trends in OC advanced stage diagnosis, receipt of treatments and the 5-year cause-specific survival across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups.

Results: There were 6491 OC patients across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups (mean [SD] age, 57.29 [13.90] years). There were 1583(24.39%) Filipino, 1183(18.23%) Chinese, and 761(11.72%) Asian Indian or Pakistani (AIP) patients. The majority (52.49%) were diagnosed with OC with at an advanced stage. AIP were more likely to have advanced stage diagnosis than other subgroups (ORs, 95%CIs: 0.77, 0.62-0.96 [Filipino]; 0.76, 0.60-0.95 [Chinese]; 0.71, 0.54-0.94 [Japanese]; 0.74, 0.56-0.98 [Vietnamese] and 0.66, 0.53-0.83 [Other Asians]). The Filipinos were least likely to receive surgery but most likely to undergo chemotherapy. Japanese patients had the worst 5-year OC cause-specific survival (50.29%, 95%CI: 46.20%-54.74%). Based on the aggregated analyses, there was a significantly decreased trend in advanced-stage diagnosis and an increased trend in receipt of chemotherapy. Trends in OC outcomes for several subethnicities differed from those observed in aggregated analyses.

Conclusion: In this cohort study of 6491 patients, OC diagnosis, treatment, survival, and trends differed across Asian American ethnic subgroups. Such differences must be considered in future research and interventions to ensure all Asian American subethnicities equally benefit from the advancements in OC care and control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
期刊最新文献
'COVID impacted my life in so many ways': a qualitative study of the lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic among people of Black ethnicities living with HIV in England. A paradox of white privilege: race, psychological resilience, and mental well-being during a public health crisis. 'I didn't expect to be so close to being diabetic': beliefs of prediabetes and diabetes prevention among Hispanic men at a federally qualified health center. Psychological distress in Asian American informal caregivers: an analysis by disaggregated ethnic groups. Racial diversity, interracial trust, and mental distress in post-apartheid South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1